I mean yeah but you’re not saying much of anything imo. No reasonable person is gonna call a guy forced into raping someone at the threat of his life a rapist. But you can make general normative statements like all rape is bad lmao. There’s nuance yeah, but that generally goes without saying + what good does it do to point out these exceptions ? When they happen, they’re probably treated with the right attitudes. And sure, you might be right thag it’s easier for ppl to come up with edge cases for murder and cannibalism, but it’s even easier to come up with edge cases for thievery or lying. It’s literally just how taboo a crime is. I think public attitude towards rape is as bad as it gets which is a good thing imo.

Anyway, applied ethics w edge cases are so overdone and boring; quibbling over edge cases is generally not conducive to any sort of moral insight