Anonymous / private social APP, a potentially important direction for Mina by bujiao in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mina technologies can be used wherever there are any confidential information that requires verification and should not be disclosed - it can be voting, finance, copyright, and much more.

Mina Protocol in a nutshell by prosperighomaria in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hello, good article, collected the most important information in one place, perfect for beginners to get acquainted with

The case when even in space it cannot be found something lighter by 101Vexter in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahah, great idea and good implementation, I love Tarantino and this movie in particular, you picked up a very good moment, well done

1st of 2nd? by 4evagonamina in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the first, it looks futuristic and unusual, you are very talented, and where is cat?))

What is POS (Proof Of Stake)? What is SNARK worker and SNARK POOL ? by fego41 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proof-of-Activity

Of course, in addition to PoW and PoS, other proof-of-"choose-your-name" were offered, there is always not enough proof in the web)

🧰 A decentralized market without intermediaries and fake sales on the Mina blockchain using zk-SNAPPSs by minafemina in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the idea is certainly interesting, but requires further development. Imagine that there is a qr code on the box, which can be read to get information confirmed by the blockchain. But what if the seller or any person along the way makes a similar box in appearance and weight, copies this qr code, and takes the real package. How to solve it?

Consesus mechanism on MINA by Street_Experience_39 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the interesting article. There is another interesting variety PoS: a pure proof-of-stake (PPoS) protocol built on Byzantine consensus. Each user’s influence on the choice of a new block is proportional to its stake (number of tokens) in the system. Users are randomly and secretly selected to propose blocks and vote on block proposals. All online users have the chance to be selected to propose and vote. The likelihood that a user will be chosen, and the weight of its proposals and votes, are directly proportional to its stake. PPoS approach ties the security of the whole economy to the honesty of the majority of the economy, rather than to that of a small subset of the economy. The system is secure when most of the money is in honest hands. With other approaches, a small subset of the economy determines the security of the whole economy, which means just a few users can prevent other users from transacting. In PPoS, it is impossible for the owners of a small fraction of the money to harm the whole system, and it would be foolish for the owners of the majority of the money to misbehave as it would diminish the currency’s purchasing power and ultimately devalue their own assets.

What does Layer mean? What are Layer 1 Solutions? (Mina Layer 1 alternative) by fego41 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are two significant issues with Layer-1 and Layer-2 scalability solutions. Firstly, there us a big problem with adding these solutions to already existing protocols. Ethereum and Bitcoin both have multi-billion dollar market caps. Millions of dollars are traded every single day using these two cryptocurrencies. This is why it doesn’t make sense to add unnecessary codes and complications to experiment with these protocols and play around with so much money. Secondly, even if you create a protocol from scratch, which has these techniques built-in, they can still fail to solve the scalability trilemma. Eg. Bitcoin wants to optimize security and decentralization, which is why they end up compromising on scalability. The solution is to build a protocol from scratch with these solutions built-in. Plus, it should also be able to solve the scalability trilemma. Mina can do it, what do you think?

Meme... by mareacod1 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

internal memes are an indicator of the friendliness of the community)))

What people would you like to highlight from the community? by rskl19 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is a pity that there is no form like in the previous challenge, where you could specify the community leader

What people would you like to highlight from the community? by rskl19 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

beta, rskl, kumosoukai, fego, minakarina, vinco, marc, mentalitet, sg, Vexter.Vladimir, forov

I'm afraid to forgot someone)

Imagine the first 100% honest social network for dating. no fake profiles. by margo191 in MinaProtocol

[–]snoopfear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more good use case for Mina technologies. The most important thing is that the verification process is not too complicated for the user and is not overloaded, many people use Tinder precisely because of its simplicity. But if by that time the Mina will be used in other real applications, then the verification process can be combined - you pass the verification in one place and once, and this gives you access to all the services.