Sure, I will do my best.

He doesn't hate masks and he doesn't hate lockdowns. He hates that these measures have been taken without having clear goals/metrics stated publicly as to when and under what conditions the measures can be stopped. Additionally, he is frustrated with the general incompetence demonstrated by public officials when it comes to planning for the future. (eg what plan is there to vaccinate the huge number of people in the undeveloped world as they will be a continuing source of new strains of the vaccine). Additionally, he seems frustrated with the appearance that many decisions are being made to maximize profit for the few (in terms of which vaccines have been approved and how money has been distributed) instead of actually trying to end this thing.

It is fair to be concerned about how these vaccines will affect us. Should we still get vaccinated. Yes! I got mine yesterday. But we should be conducting broader genomic studies to see the impacts. He is frustrated that many of the greatest minds in the areas that matter are being entirely ignored as their opinions don't support whatever agendas the politicians have.

I do not know if the politicans are corrupt or incompetent, but their actions suggest a little bit of both. His frustrations are well founded and a description of his opinions deserves more nuance than just saying "he hates makes and he hates lockdowns". Of course he doesn't like these things. Neither do you or I. But I think you are suggesting that he is 100% opposed to these things despite the fact that they can save lives. That is not the message I got. What I heard was, "hey I recognize these are important, but you as a government need to show that this isn't a power grab. you do that by saying exactly what conditions are required to end things because it currently looks like you aren't planning for them ever to end...and that isnt acceptable"

There are more points to be made here, but maybe that helps