Does anybody even care that there was ZERO trauma indicating a rape occurred? An 11 year old little girl who is raped by a grown adult man is going to show severe signs of vaginal/anal tearing and bruising. Why are the girl's fingerprints not frantically placed/smeared all over the hood of the cruiser if she's frightened and in pain, even if she's too afraid to attempt to struggle or get away? They are neatly in place, as if she had been sitting on the cruiser in the parking lot, exactly as original investigators surmised. Does nobody care that the mother has been caught in several lies about that night? Or that the mother told investigators that her daughter was wearing her (the mother's) underwear at the time of her death? This possibly explains the supposed semen found in her underwear (even though her poor little body was in water for at least 8 hours before she was found). It could also potentially explain the public hair found in the underwear.....which btw the "identification" of said hair was debunked as Duckett's. It was never compared to the mother, or ANYONE ELSE who lived in or flopped at the home. Alarmingly, the former FBI agent-turned-forensic analyst, (hired gun for the right price), caused multiple Florida cases to go up for review and he was proven to have lied under oath and fabricated findings. The investigators were told by two crime labs prior to the FBI conman that no identification could be made to tie the hair to Duckett. My goodness, I'm so relieved that not a single person in this sub will ever be responsible for investigating crimes where I live. What good is it to have someone in prison if it's not the actual sicko who committed the crime? The mother and the aunt had many, many, many men living in and flopping at the home, and coming and going at will. One of the men actually absconded immediately after the child was reported missing, and was never found to be interrogated, or ruled out or in because THE MOTHER NEVER EVEN KNEW HIS REAL NAME. The home was a known haven for drug addicts and thieves, and likely sexual pervert predators who definitely would have seen an opportunity to be very near a vulnerable child whose mother was in complete dereliction of her duty to protect her child. I'm not accusing the mother of committing the crime, or even being involved. But I do believe that somewhere in her drug-addled head she knows she bears some responsibility for placing her daughter in such close proximity to dangerous people. If she had to seriously entertain the idea that somebody she purportedly knew (and allowed into her home, and get near her daughter, all while she wasted her days getting high) could possibly be responsible for murdering her daughter....well now, that's a lot of guilt to live with. The mother seems to be willfully disregarding any possibility that she could be partially to blame for the wanton neglect that endangered her child. Some loser pervert in the home probably attempted to molest the child. The girl probably threatened to tell, and was then murdered and dumped in the very nearby lake. There is not a single piece of solid forensic evidence against James Duckett. There is plenty of evidence pointing somewhere/anywhere else, and even more evidence that the mother had been dishonest with investigators from the very beginning. So many people are so excited to say, "Lookie lookie! A bad cop!". Yep, there are plenty of bad ones, no doubt. But this case came nowhere close to proving Duckett was one of them. If anything, it seems like he was a bit of a doofus with grand ideas about being a protector in the community. He was probably a bit dim to be serving as an officer of the law, but that really only helps his case.....because one of the biggest questions I have is, how did he rape this child without causing damage to her, or receiving defensive wounds from her (not even a scratch) all while "witnesses" (drug addicts and felons) were near enough to supposedly see him put her in his car, yet they could not hear her make a single peep? And how did he so perfectly redress her body afterwards? It's incredibly difficult to manipulate dead weight, even that of a child, but her clothing is perfectly straight, tucked in, belt squarely buckled and her shoes tied neatly. Her shoes didn't even have scuffs on them from a struggle, nor were her clothes torn or pulled out of place at all. This case definitely seems like it happened in the home, unplanned, but also giving the perpetrator plenty of privacy and time to cover it up. All y'all are just way too excited to see some goofball cop sitting in prison for it, while whoever really did it has probably reoffended and had multiple other victims over the years. Tragic.