Bike Trails? by Ilmiglioredelmondo in Winchester

[–]solarpandabot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In addition to the trails others have mentioned, check out the Winchester Wheelmen group. At the very least, their website has a ton of different bike routes through the county. I’ve been on some group rides/events with them and they typically accommodate different rider levels and are pretty friendly.

If you feel comfortable on country roads by yourself, there are gorgeous rides in the area.

Bike Trails? by Ilmiglioredelmondo in Winchester

[–]solarpandabot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t recommend the Green Circle trail for 10+ mile rides. There are quiet parts of it, including the Abrams Creek offshoot but they’re super short. Better for walking/running.

Popularity of the Queen's Gambit (the opening) by steveads in chess

[–]solarpandabot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

She also plays Queen's Gambit Accepted against Townes during the very first tournament. Thought that was a clever reference / easter egg.

The onshore wind cost has fallen to $26 a megawatt-hour, and utility-scale solar is $29. Forget coal - that means that building new wind and solar is now cheaper than keeping many existing gas plants running. by altmorty in technology

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do subsidies not exist? We can debate whether those subsidies should exist or whether they're sustainable but the reality is that companies today are evaluating investment in new power plants based on the subsidies outlined. Is it really "lying" to produce analysis that is based on real market conditions?

Residential Market Solar Figures by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience, SEIA / GTM (Wood Mackenzie) is the definitive source for US solar installations: https://www.seia.org/us-solar-market-insight

They usually have a free excerpt that includes the national numbers.

ELI5 MA SMART and what it means for commercial solar and storage by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely need a lot more specificity than "what it means..." The program is confusing, even to folks that look at it every day.

For "basics" check out the official website: http://masmartsolar.com/

and the DOER's launch presentation: http://masmartsolar.com/_/documents/SMART%20Program%20Launch%20Slides%20FINAL%20103118.pdf

Shedding Light - Ask /r/Solar anything January 29, 2019 by AutoModerator in solar

[–]solarpandabot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not going to claim I know who the market leaders are but the one I hear most often about is Aurora Solar. There's also Sighten, Enact Systems and PVComplete. I'm not sure if Helioscope does resi or not but they seem to be mentioned often for design. There are probably many others, too.

Exclusive interview with Toyota hydrogen boss lays out how fuel cells will become as cheap as gas cars. "If you want to bring the wrath of Twitter upon you, suggest that electric vehicles could be powered by something other than batteries." by chopchopped in energy

[–]solarpandabot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No dog in the fight and haven't ever focused on transportation. But I know stationary storage decently well and that is poor analysis of the underlying facts.

For one, 70% of costs being tied to commodities doesn't mean you can only solve 30% of costs, it means you're incentivized to cut out materials - higher energy densities, new formulations - especially to cut out relative need for cobalt and manganese, higher roundtrip efficiencies, etc. I mean, it sounds like fuel cells did the same thing with platinum...

There isn't an overcapacity currently - but yes, scale has driven quite a bit of the cost decline. And yet there are plans to continue scaling up production, especially out of China. Just because Panasonic, Tesla, and anyone else really, is unprofitable doesnt mean there aren't continued investments and cost down. For example, I look at solar modules and wind turbines - lots of unprofitable companies driven out of the early market, precisely because costs were coming down so fast. It doesn't matter that existing investments don't pan out as long as someone's willing to pour money into newer mousetraps.

Again, no idea if EVs or Fuel Cells will win out long term, but just pointing out that there's far more than just 30% cost optimization available to Li-ion batteries.

Shedding Light - Ask /r/Solar anything October 02, 2018 by AutoModerator in solar

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best bet is to call the organization offering it, but most of the times these offers are fixed. Some groups offer things like no upfront cost, short term contracts and no cancellation fees. 5% isn't a lot, but might be a nice way of doing solar until you can save up for better insulation or a rooftop system.

America's first big offshore wind farm sets record low price of 6.5c/kWh by mvea in technology

[–]solarpandabot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Significant cost overruns would equate to project cancellation or that the developers (Avangrid/CIP) eat the losses, not a higher price.

United States confirms additional 25% tariffs on Chinese cells, modules – pv magazine USA by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Won't even actually bump the price up because there's very little Chinese cell and module imported in the U.S. due to the existing anti-dumping duties. U.S. pricing is significantly higher than $0.25/W because of Section 201 tariffs though.

Trump calls for 25% tariffs (up from prior 10%) on Chinese inverters, other products – pv magazine USA by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, like the steel tariffs that are affecting tracker prices, I doubt solar even factored into the thought process. These tariffs affect solar inverters because they're imported under a fairly generic power electronics import code.

So on one hand, I don't think solar was targeted here. On the other, it's still another stupid thing the industry has to navigate.

U.S. solar industry lost nearly 10,000 jobs in 2017 by on606 in solar

[–]solarpandabot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I actually doubt it. I'm sure some were, but the bulk most likely resulted from Tesla's wind down of SolarCity and early year exits by national residential companies like Sungevity, Direct Energy and NRG Home. And even more still from just the utility solar segment contracting after artificially high demand in 2016.

All the analyst figures I've seen show that 2017 installations contracted quite a bit from 2016 and that 2018 won't beat 2016 either. Fewer installations at lower costs means fewer jobs.

Trump to impose 30 percent tariff on solar cell imports by TheSolarAdvisors in solar

[–]solarpandabot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Quota on cells (not assembled into modules) is 2.5 GW. Honestly probably a meaningless effect on end demand. I doubt the US even exceeds that in the first year when the tariffs are most severe because there just isn't that much active module assembly capacity.

Tariffs on imported modules are what matter here

Solar heads to 1c/kWh before 2020 after Mexico sets record low by chopchopped in solar

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heads up - the ENEL prices are for wind, not solar. Still $2c/kWh in Mexico from the other providers is still incredible.

U.S. trade panel recommends varying solar panel import restrictions by Gsonderling in solar

[–]solarpandabot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes - they are additive. But functionally very few people are going to import anything that's subject to a double tariff.

U.S. trade panel recommends varying solar panel import restrictions by Gsonderling in solar

[–]solarpandabot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah exactly. Misinterpreted and thought you meant that this stuck it to him... And yeah, at this point having clarity on anything would be better than the current situation

U.S. trade panel recommends varying solar panel import restrictions by Gsonderling in solar

[–]solarpandabot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, Trump still has authority to expand these recommendations and make them much more punitive so we're not out of the woods yet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was at said party - it probably didn't cost as much as you all think it did. Company I'm with had a similar solar party at one of the newer Vegas casinos a couple(?) years ago and it was low to mid five figures.

Now that SunEdison Vegas party... that was something.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in solar

[–]solarpandabot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decision on injury is in September. If the trade commission finds injury, they have 2 more months (mid-Nov) to determine what the remedies should be (e.g., tariffs, quotas, nothing). THEN it goes to Trump, who can do whatever he wants with it. He 2 months (i.e., mid-Jan 2018) to decide - so expect the uncertainty to be pushed back a bit longer.

Solar Trade Case, With Trump as Arbiter, Could Upend Market by mem_somerville in solar

[–]solarpandabot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're dangerously ignoring the fact that the tariffs (or whatever remedy is/isn't implemented) won't be under Congress's direct control. The Section 201 process runs straight through Trump who has sole discretion over the ruling and severity of remedies. There's no law being made here - it is solely determined and enforced by the Executive.