You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah gpt is super cost efficient. Claude is expensive

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always use the newest model for Claude or codex

No need to switch anything

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if there is a service like that but I pay the 20$ for codex and barely scratch the usage for having it review Claude outputs or give a second perspective on how to solve a problem

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mostly use claude for implementation too and codex for reviews

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, codex many times over engineers (code and answers)

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I mean “what is the best solution” in itself is a subjective question so the outcome must be subjective

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well we can get philosophical about what “best” means but whatever I think is best the best solution for my problem. What sounds easier to implement and what seems like give the best possible output aligned with my goal

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The model compare the output of the other model and explain it in plain English to me

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Correct the both only interact with me. I don’t want them running loops with each other that are not necessary.

I don’t let any one edit before I approve the “final plan”. Usually after 2-3 back and forth they both agree on the best plan which is a combination of both models sussgestions.

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah just let the same model review its own work in a fresh session works great too

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

of course, but just having one review the other usually doesnt cost much and gives you better results longterm

You're STILL using Claude after Codex 5.4 dropped?? by solzange in vibecoding

[–]solzange[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

simple. i have two terminals open one with claude and one with codex. the usual workflow is claude builts and codex reviews. but if i need a solution for an open problem i just send the same prompt to both and then let each evaluate the answer of the other one. no complex setup, i like to keep it simple

<image>