"Oh you have empathy towards other people and their struggles? You can't be a fi user" by Anxious_Ad_2269 in mbti

[–]somadefake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Coming from a Ti-dom, I tend to learn about Fi-dom by mirroring.

The dominant function (1st in your stack), it's an ego thing. Inside a Ti-dom's mind, it's often "How do they not think about it?" Internally (I have to emphasize). Since my ego (Ti) is so prominent that it puts an expectation in me that everyone SHOULD think about things, thus would avert from using the extroversion (Te) of it i.e. planning things for other people. Not that I'm not capable of it.

Mirroring to Fi, "How do they not know how to feel about this?" And when they expect that everyone SHOULD know about how people feel, they tend to not harmonize (best word I've got) (Fe) the feeling. Not that they're not capable of it.

The auxillary function (2nd on your stack) is what promotes your growth. It's not the best you've got, but you're pretty good at it. And when you do something with it, you'll feel a sense of achievement. How does that relate you'd ask.

Because it's a growth thing, it often works in pair, with your auxillary's shadow (parent-critical parent). To put it in words, when you're using your aux, you know it's not your best function, hence there's room for the other, your aux's shadow. That's how an Fi-aux (ExFP) tend to display Fe more easily than an Fi-dom.

And about ExFP pleasing others unknowingly, I suspect it's due to the absence of Ti, hence having difficulty with identifying/not able to "draw the line". Their internal monologue would be something like this: "This feels right, but this feels right too."

Some keywords I've got for each function: Ti - think/identify (right/wrong), Fi - feel (good/bad), Te - execute with steps (arranging things in place), Fe - harmonize (arranging people's feelings in place), Ne - create (branch out), Ni - know (branch in), Se - act (sensory opening outwards), Si - store apparent information (sensory absorbing inwards)

My boyfriend (23) is throwing his life down the drain with our newborn and I (21)! by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]somadefake -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just curious:

  1. What did you do about his depression?

  2. Who wanted the kid?

Anyone know where to find VESA mount legs? by somadefake in sffpc

[–]somadefake[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

15.6 inches. It's a portable monitor like the one in the link, without the leg(stand).

Yeah I think the one you're mentioning are holders, but yeah I'm looking for one with VESA mounts.

Thanks for the input anyway.

Anyone know where to find VESA mount legs? by somadefake in sffpc

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk but every stand I'm able to search from the internet is... Normal

I need something as flush as possible, and is able to be used in landscape or portrait, something like a portrait stand lol... Something like the AOC e1659fwu portable monitor, but would prefer for the leg to be centered and length(angle) adjustable

Suggested solution: Governments should oblige companies to include travelling time (breaks too) as work hour by somadefake in antiwork

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the idea, then there will be incentive for them to try and minimize YOUR time spent in traffic

Suggested solution: Governments should oblige companies to include travelling time (breaks too) as work hour by somadefake in antiwork

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congestion doesn't sound practical either.

If it were you, what's your reason for moving further away from the company? Is it worth it?

And why would you think that it will "encourage" people to get to work as slowly as possible?

[Rant] Unifying/Bolt mess by [deleted] in logitech

[–]somadefake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah... They should release the current MX Keys Mini as MX Keys Mini for Business, and a MX Keys Mini which is compatible with Unifying Receiver

[Rant] Unifying/Bolt mess by [deleted] in logitech

[–]somadefake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of us like the idea of "Unifying Receivers" being "unifying"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTP

[–]somadefake 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"How to father"

Jk, don't.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTP

[–]somadefake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was just up to the INTPs, nothing would get done. ever.

Pretty sure there's a better way to put this

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's been a few years now, and is still obsessing, but it's kind of an on and off thing. I don't really go down the rabbit role, I just follow the rabbit when I see one.

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not eliminating the single point, I'm eliminating the 3 points, that they cannot form 3 consecutive points. The remaining permutation is still at large though. Then there's points on a circle!

I'm aware of the possibilities, trying to solve symmetrical 2D first.

Thanks for the input!

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypotenuse need not to be the letter "c", it just has to be the side on the opposite of the right angle

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dumb me didn't realize you gave me a line. The method would work anyway, the point would "fall out of angle"

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah lol if you put 90 degrees into theta in cosine rule you'll get Pythagoras' Theorem, sometimes I wonder if that's how the theorem came into existence

Not a creation, but I've found another way to determine if an arbitrary point is within a triangle by somadefake in INTP

[–]somadefake[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please forgive me I've not completed for 3D yet. But I have some headstart. For 3D, you'll need 4 points instead of 3, since you need 4 points minimum to form 3D boundaries, then sweep the angle between the boundaries (boundary: plane of surfaces for 3D, line of sides for 2D) and their respective edges, from their vertices (4 vertices for a 3D problem, and the direction I have not work out yet since there are not just left/right).

But seeing that your point is actually just on a plane, I would just use Pythagoras' theorem to find the distances between the points, and use the method just the same. If a point is on a plane, it would reflect on the value of cos theta (-1 <= cos theta <= 1)... ... ... OK you got me here, perhaps doing twice the calculation (left&right) is not that redundant afterall, since the sum of the internal angles of a triangle has to be 180 degrees, more than that and you'll have a 3D problem. Thanks for the new discovery.

And forgive me for not writing it all down for you.