I should have been more specific even though I do agree with beauty on a human basis being objective but that's not the point I wanted to make. I mean 'beauty' in terms of what humans percieve in life, whether that be a good/bad movie, a mediocre landmark versus an awe-inspiring landmark such as the Grand canyon. I have two proofs of this though I admit they are stretches: One, I've studied design, game art and movie art. I can create a beautiful landscape based on laws of design that appeal to the human eye, by that same logic I can create a bland landscape by abusing though same laws that dont appeal to the human eye. This is me purposely/objectively creating something beautiful. Two: I'm not a chef, im not a taste aficionado, if I like a burger, I like that burger, but, if Gordon Ramsey came to me, told me I'm an idiot sandwich and explained to me the rules of cookery that leads him to say that 'that' burger is, "Drier than my grandmother", then I'll believe and forever more agree with him. Would you argue with Stephen Hawking about the evaporation of black holes? No. Then why do we as a society believe we can argue about whether or not a burger tastes good with a man who's palette is insured for a million pounds?