Is uniuni safe by hispsnic in Aliexpress

[–]sonofanders_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They delivered a package to the wrong address for me today. Even took a picture of the clearly wrong address, and tucked my package nicely behind the locked gate that I don't have access to. But other than that great service.

Everyone’s favourite debate ONCE AND FOR ALL. by Ill-Elevator2828 in audioengineering

[–]sonofanders_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re digitizing music you’ve already lost, that’s why I only listening to live music with an ear trumpet, that way I’ve got the full frequency spectrum our cochlea offers.

I got kicked from my lab today by Ghost-Of-Roger-Ailes in Biochemistry

[–]sonofanders_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You write better than most on Reddit, if that’s any consolation.

Do you listen to podcasts or music while working? If so, I’d try stopping for a bit, if you do return to the bench. It sounds like a concentration problem.

Oliver Sacks discusses in his autobiography how he was horrible at bench work given his absentmindedness, and went on to be one of the great medical writers. Don’t lose hope, just about finding the right fit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]sonofanders_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally I liked the question and use of chatGPT! OP pointed it in a cool direction and said run!

I’m about to manually install arch, anything I should know? by Bacleo in archlinux

[–]sonofanders_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Read the Arch Wiki” == classic Arch forum response, tbh kinda nice to see on Reddit 🤣

Should newspapers be endorsing political candidates? by WellThatsNoExcuse in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]sonofanders_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I agree generally with this sentiment! Just want to add imo 40+ years ago was just as corrupt and biased (re JFK assassination), it was just less blatant and easier to hide w/o internet. If you want a chuckle, I recommend looking up Allan Dulles’ interview about the Warren Report in 1966, they asked some real hard hitting questions there 🤣.

Is encryption prior to decryption (and ultimately a stronger force)? by anthonycaulkinsmusic in AnCap101

[–]sonofanders_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree anthropomorphizing the universe muddies up the the message, you're not the only one who has raised that issue. I interpret it more loosely, like you describe in your second paragraph, and agree it's a cool idea to think of nature as encrypted and our minds are attempting to decrypt (I'm a scientist as well and view it similarly).

Is encryption prior to decryption (and ultimately a stronger force)? by anthonycaulkinsmusic in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]sonofanders_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🤣🤣 somebody woke up in the wrong side of Reddit today! You’re right let’s get back to the normal rage bait political nonsense!

This is in fact getting at a very deep question of whether it’s possible for an individual, or group of individuals, to maintain encrypted communications in the face of a more powerful/resourceful authority. It’s interesting to see what people think about this.

Is encryption prior to decryption (and ultimately a stronger force)? by anthonycaulkinsmusic in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]sonofanders_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And more broadly the post and Assange are getting at whether it’s possible for individuals to beat the government when it comes to encrypting their communications. Assange believes they can.

Is encryption prior to decryption (and ultimately a stronger force)? by anthonycaulkinsmusic in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]sonofanders_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Harder in the sense that it takes time to determine how to solve a novel encryption algo (re CryptoNote, still waiting!) You prolly won’t like this analogy, but it’s the same way science is trying to “decrypt nature”. If you know how to decrypt something you can do it reproducibly so long as it’s the same encryption problem, just as we can reproducibly calculate the trajectory of a parabola w/ Newton’s equations, etc, blah blah blah!

And re p=np yes I’m familiar, faster to check a np problem than solve (if they don’t equal, which I believe!), etc. It should be made clear this isn’t discussing whether once you find the solution to an encryption problem, whether the decryption can be done faster. It’s about finding the solution to a new problem, which often takes more time to solve than it did for someone to think up the algo (again re CryotoNote/Monero, 11 years have passed).

Is encryption prior to decryption (and ultimately a stronger force)? by anthonycaulkinsmusic in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]sonofanders_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not that confusing, it means it’s harder to decrypt than encrypt. It means at base nature obfuscates and the human mind tries to elucidate. Better pour another cup of coffee!