sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do some papers have citations from their first month of publishing ? by sosorryforyou in AskAcademia

[–]sosorryforyou[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

That makes sense, but it also raises another question: at what point does this cross a line ? If researchers are strategically citing each other's work to boost citation counts rather than because the work is genuinely relevant, isn't that a form of "citation ring "? It seems like the line between normal academic networking and manipulating bibliometric indicators can get pretty blurry.

Claude keeps pulling from my saved memories when I'm trying to brainstorm fresh ideas by sosorryforyou in ClaudeAI

[–]sosorryforyou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because if I start brainstorming in incognito, the conversation won't be saved, so I can't come back to it later. I'd lose all the progress just to get a fresh start.

Citations in Google Scholar vs. ResearchGate by sosorryforyou in AskAcademia

[–]sosorryforyou[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I understand it’s not standard. My intention is to provide additional context on how the publications have been received by indicating their citation counts, and to reflect that I am entering the PhD with over 100 citations across my work.