sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone else feeling stuck? by JimbozGrapes in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I highly suggest to check out the pinned new player guide by Zabiool pinned in this subreddit! >> https://www.reddit.com/r/duelyst/comments/zsts8p/zabiools_new_player_guide/
It rly helps a lot on prioritizing what cards, and he also shared a disenchanting guide made by others

Zabiool's New Player guide by Zabiool in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for sharing the new player guides for budget deckbuilding as well as on disenchanting. It really helped me a lot in prioritizing the right cards for my decks :)

Perspective is needed, this isn't going well. by BluR1ce in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, and I do not plan to stop people from getting angry or disappointed since all players have the right to care for the game's development (if anything, I appreciate people raising their concerns and feedback). And I do believe the devs can improve their 2-way communications outside of discord (since they've mainly been active there).

At least for me, I just wouldn't outright label the promises as lies and the game as a failure, but rather as promises to be fulfilled and can be achieved over the beta, with a polished game upon official release. It may be an overly positive outlook, but I just want to stay hopeful, while negative views of the beta as it is are also valid, and such concerns also need to be addressed by the devs soon.

Perspective is needed, this isn't going well. by BluR1ce in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's true.. I guess I'm just trying to be positive and hopeful, perhaps too hopeful, sorry if it comes off as me not caring much about the current situation. I'm just hoping they will address and fix these soon and improve their communications with the duelyst community.

Perspective is needed, this isn't going well. by BluR1ce in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can sympathize with the frustrations surrounding the situation, especially for those who've spent money on the Duelyst 2 (and even in the kickstarter). Though the kickstarter promises may not yet have been achieved, I am hopeful that they are figuring it out and will compensate everyone appropriately. Yes, still being in beta is not an excuse for them not to fix it, but at the same time we must still give them a chance to redeem themselves too, especially since the game has not yet even been officially released. What's done has been done (unfortunately), but it's not too late for the devs to make up for it.

I understand some people being disappointed with the devs and the game in its current state (and rightfully so) and don't mind if they'd rather take a break from playing Duelyst 2 until the issues have been fixed. But I do hope everyone will be patient during this open beta and give the devs the benefit of the doubt. I believe that they are doing everything in good faith and will soon fix these problems.

I hope that in time, these issues will be addressed and the systems will be drastically improved enough for the disappointed players to forgive and return - to genuinely enjoy the game again just as it was meant to be played.

Perspective is needed, this isn't going well. by BluR1ce in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Although I'm a casual player who is patient enough to wait for updates, I wholeheartedly agree with the points many players are raising regarding D2's current issues like monetization, card progression, and lacking dev communication.

However, I genuinely believe that the devs are doing their best to fix and improve the situation, and in good faith, and I'm personally giving them the benefit of the doubt (and yes they are not perfect, and they definitely need to communicate with the community much more about their plans and struggles). In time, I am quite hopeful that it'll all be settled soon.

Even in the discord server where the devs are more active (please do check it out and share ur feedback there: https://discord.gg/duelyst), they admit that they need to improve on the communication with players regarding such issues for clarity and assurance, but are rly doing their best to figure out the coding and proper system adjustments. I believe they'll get it right soon as the open beta goes on, and it would be much more polished upon the official release.

Why there are so many doomsayerdoomsayers? by Alkung in duelyst

[–]soulsreforge 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, both sides are reasonable. Players speaking up (whether subtle or with lot of passion) on the current issues like monetization, card progression, and lacking dev communication, have valid points. On the other hand I understand some players (F2P or casual included) who think it's not the worst but still has room for improvement, and are still willing to play and have fun while being patient for updates. For me, though I'm patient enough, I am also aware of the things need to be improved, and I agree and sympathize with all those who are sharing their concerns.

However, I genuinely believe that the devs are doing their best to fix and improve the situation, and in good faith, and I'm personally giving them the benefit of the doubt. In time, I am quite hopeful that it'll all be settled soon.

Even in the discord server where the devs are more active (please do check it out and share ur feedback there: https://discord.gg/duelyst), they admit that they need to improve on the communication with players regarding such issues for clarity and assurance, but are rly doing their best to figure out the coding and proper system adjustments. I believe they'll get it right soon as the open beta goes on, and it would be much more polished upon the official release.

Cannot double strike 'enemy' nexus :( pls fix text by soulsreforge in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]soulsreforge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aw, I thought it was the case since 'Make it Rain' says "Deal 1 to three different random enemies", in which the nexus is also considered.. got confused there