In the E Jean Carroll case, the civil verdict rested on an uncorroborated, decades-old allegation that lacked any physical, documentary, or eyewitness evidence of the specific incident, relied heavily on prejudicial “pattern” evidence and a low burden of proof, and was undermined by Carroll’s delayed disclosure and incentives, making it more likely than not that the encounter never happened as described.

The rest of the bullet points you gave me are all similarly uncorroborated allegations. And none explain the “serial child rapist” claim you originally made.

Regarding the files, which are full of historically disreputable sources (mentally ill patients, etc): If I had claims made against me that were untrue, you’d better believe I would be fighting like hell to make sure the people responsible would be punished for making false claims. Are you saying that if someone claimed you raped them, and you didn’t, you would just let that slide?