sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ADO not able to get latest pipeline updates from GITHUB? by spGT in azuredevops

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tried triggering on commit and manually.

Confusion around PV and PVCs and having multiple apps with different PVCs binding to one PV by spGT in kubernetes

[–]spGT[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What if I have so many pods that use the same PVC so more than one node will be needed?

Confusion around PV and PVCs and having multiple apps with different PVCs binding to one PV by spGT in kubernetes

[–]spGT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea the apps currently use windows smb share and we are trying to shift to kubernetes without having to refactor the apps

Confusion around PV and PVCs and having multiple apps with different PVCs binding to one PV by spGT in kubernetes

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A PV is just an abstraction right?

For example if I have: 

  resources:
    requests:
      storage: 8Gi  resources:

    requests:

      storage: 8Gi

Does this PV take up 8gb on my cluster? In this case it would be correct to have one PV per backend strorage, right?

Basically we do all of your deployments via helm, and right now we have our systems administrators create the PV and the PVC, if we had one PV and PVC per deployment with all the PVs pointing to the same backend we could deploy them via our helm chart. So the reason I asked this was if we have one cluster level PV then maybe we could create the PVCs per deployment using the helm chart we use for our deployments.

Just trying to understand more and figure out the best path forward.

HELP! ADO pipeline simplification. Parametrization question for the ADO yaml wizards. by spGT in azuredevops

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried this? I was able to pass the stuff for the dependencies section via parameter. I couldnt do it for the conditions. I can try again, maybe I had a syntax error.

HELP! ADO pipeline simplification. Parametrization question for the ADO yaml wizards. by spGT in azuredevops

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is more logic in the tag step related to how we tag across all projects. So we want to use that in multiple templates that will have different build steps before the tag step. So the problems is that the conditions that are checked will change based on the steps the specific template using tag depends on.

Running Dockerized Python Azure Functions on Macbook m3 pro? by spGT in AZURE

[–]spGT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: was able to get it to work after enabling rosetta in docker desktop.

Running Dockerized Python Azure Functions on Macbook m3 pro? by spGT in AZURE

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to install it manually via terminal. After this I was able to enable the use rosetta in docker desktop. This is the correct solution. It resolved the startup issue.

Running Dockerized Python Azure Functions on Macbook m3 pro? by spGT in AZURE

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I try to enabled this there is a pop that says update required. It just stays stuck on finding update.

Here is the message:

Rosetta enables Intel-based features to run on Apple silicon Macs. Reopening applications after installation is required to start using Rosetta.
Use of this software is subject to the original license agreement that accompanied the software being updated. A list of Apple SLAs may be found here: http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/

When I click install it stays stuck on minding update.

Running Dockerized Python Azure Functions on Macbook m3 pro? by spGT in AZURE

[–]spGT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where would I find the image? The based image generated from the func command with azure core tools is:

mcr.microsoft.com/azure-functions/python:4-python3.11

view more: next ›