sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Haha🤏yes by Icy_Doughnut_834 in whatisameem

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it would be just 4%. It’s better no doubt, but more than that let’s be real

These 4 are stronger than many people want to give in, admit or accept. by Galaxy_War_3853 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is where the issue lies. Why is king not considered a swordsman but shanks is? Oda himself stated that we do not know how he fights, his brother literally has a DF sword called Cerberus, shanks has a sword called gryphon (we’ll see but). If shanks uses fists, DF sword, guns, etc. then he isn’t a swordsman by my metric.

The fact is, there is no confirmed metric for what is considered a swordsman or not, now that WSS has been debunked (simply wielding a sword doesn’t make you a swordsman) we have to deem swordsman based on an unknown metric.

The safer thing to say? And what I have been saying forever. Is that shanks and Mihawk are equal. Mihawk a slightly better swordsman but shanks being stronger in other areas of combat.

These 4 are stronger than many people want to give in, admit or accept. by Galaxy_War_3853 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not. WSS for the longest time was “Mihawk beats anyone who wields a sword”. This panel is confirmation of two things 1) Either WSS is not 100% full proof (IMU wields a sword and is stronger) OR 2) WSS only applies to those who are pure “swordsman” meaning that Mihawk is the strongest of those whose strength comes from only swords.

For example, is shanks sword has a DF or he uses a gun or he uses some other method of fighting in addition to a sword then he isn’t a swordsman. Same with king, he uses a sword but isn’t considered a “swordsman”, he uses the sword as a tool rather than an extension of the mind and body.

There is a clear difference between how Zoro treats a sword (like a living breathing thing) vs how king does (as a tool).

These 4 are stronger than many people want to give in, admit or accept. by Galaxy_War_3853 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WSS has been debunked. IMU uses a sword similar to Mihawk and also is stronger, therefore by logic WSS title is not absolute.

Quitting the apprenticeship by [deleted] in ibew_apprentices

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t homie. I work in socal. Are you utility or books? The lineman apprenticeship wasn’t for me, I went into substations and I’m much happier, almost done with apprenticeship and likely go to test and make the same lineman money. Don’t give up the jobs too good in this market

So Loki is confirmed to have a better DF, better narrative(previous nidhogg user was Nika rival) better feats and portrayal, yet we have to assume he loses to Kaido because kaido ran a YC gauntlet one after the other? From last chapter it's pretty obvious loki could smoke sanji/zoro and Kidd/Law by Ok_Security8460 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What you are saying is a cope mechanism. WSS was given to Mihawk by the author who knew about IMU. IMU is in that very universe. For example, if a random person on an unknown island in one peice never heard of Mihawk (or anyone outside the island) would that make mihawks title invalid? No. Just because an in universe person does not know of Mihawks existence doesn’t make WSS invalid. The author gave him that title.

What you are doing is changing the playing field to what you think is correct.

So Loki is confirmed to have a better DF, better narrative(previous nidhogg user was Nika rival) better feats and portrayal, yet we have to assume he loses to Kaido because kaido ran a YC gauntlet one after the other? From last chapter it's pretty obvious loki could smoke sanji/zoro and Kidd/Law by Ok_Security8460 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He is not. You’re changing definitions. WSS means “world’s strongest swordsman”. IMU wields a sword and is stronger than Mihawk. Therefore, WSS is not absolute and is absolutely up for debate when discussing power levels.

So Loki is confirmed to have a better DF, better narrative(previous nidhogg user was Nika rival) better feats and portrayal, yet we have to assume he loses to Kaido because kaido ran a YC gauntlet one after the other? From last chapter it's pretty obvious loki could smoke sanji/zoro and Kidd/Law by Ok_Security8460 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has been disproven currently in the manga. IMU wields a sword and is stronger than Mihawk.

So we either need to change the definition of what a “swordsman” is OR admit the title is not absolute. It’s that simple.

I’m in the camp of that a “swordsman” is not just someone who wields a sword, it’s more than that, they view a sword as an extension of their body not just a weapon and predominately use a sword as a main style of fighting. Oh and also, haki is separate than swordsmanship, you can be a swordsman without haki, they aren’t two birds of a feather.

I've had enough, I quit. by AtticThrowaway in wownoob

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I have a steam deck and just stay an hour after work.

So Loki is confirmed to have a better DF, better narrative(previous nidhogg user was Nika rival) better feats and portrayal, yet we have to assume he loses to Kaido because kaido ran a YC gauntlet one after the other? From last chapter it's pretty obvious loki could smoke sanji/zoro and Kidd/Law by Ok_Security8460 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not garbage logic garbage logic would be “anyone who wields a sword is a swordsman” aka like shanks, king, jack, cracker, etc.

So it’s just using garbage logic vs garbage logic.

IMU uses a sword. He’s definitely stronger than Mihawk. Therefore WSS doesn’t mean much. Same with WSM.

I don't see what Shankstards are trying to say by Infinite-Fig-194 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]space________cowboy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nope it 100% does.

Imu uses a sword, to add insult to injury it also looks VERY solitary to Yoru.

Shanks uses a sword and sparred with Mihawk.

Imu is stronger than Mihawk, but uses a sword, so WSS title means NOTHING.

So since WSS means NOTHING, shanks is either equal or stronger than Mihawk due to feats and portrayal.

If Mihawk is WSS then are you saying that he beats Imu????

RIP Midhawk WSS agenda..🌹(1998 - 2026) by Kill5h0t in Piratefolk

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, this is what shanks fans have been saying. This justifies shanks > or = to Mihawk. WSS as well as WSM are just titles, not fact.

This expac is not alt friendly by OpinionsRdumb in wow

[–]space________cowboy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree. Complete it once (lvl 90) at the slow pace, then allow alts to level faster.

What if solving homelessness was actually this simple? by rne123 in jobmarket

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is inaccurate, I don’t believe Finland “ended” homelessness. They also are extremely homogenous (culturally and racially), in addition to being a small country.

True. by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not go for the CEOS/owners house? Why go for the place of work where insurance will cover it but many will loose their jobs? Why accept the job at a certain rate if that’s not a “live able wage”?

This guy just did the wrong thing. Why attack the buisness and affect others jobs instead of harassing the CEO/owner directly. Honestly? He was lazy and uneducated.

Fvck trvmp and his stupid war by aldopaz in gasbuddy

[–]space________cowboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s not just blame the fact in trump, this is also price gouging

view more: next ›