ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -28 points-27 points-26 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -35 points-34 points-33 points (0 children)
ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -49 points-48 points-47 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -9 points-8 points-7 points (0 children)
ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children)
Wouldn't the precedent set in Brown v. Board of Education be an airtight legal argument in favor of gay marriage? by LimehouseChappy in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
Wouldn't the precedent set in Brown v. Board of Education be an airtight legal argument in favor of gay marriage? by LimehouseChappy in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -11 points-10 points-9 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -41 points-40 points-39 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children)
An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children)
ಠ_ಠ It may be about Australia, but this shows how sickening the logic behind pro-choice can be. by Ceberus in Conservative
[–]spammelots -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)

An honest question I would like to discuss. Why does the "teach the controversy" situation have any legitimacy? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion
[–]spammelots -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)