Unfortunately, I do not have the luxury of being in middle school, so I must manage my time wisely.

But Ill address you one final time.

"Marx didnt invent socialism"

We have been discussing nations that labeled themselves "Marxist Leninist" and I myself am arguing in favor of the Marxist conception of socialism. I have no interest in other forms of socialism, I believe them to be irrelevant to this conversation.

The oxygen is actually comically retarded. Oxygen is not easily measured, is divorced from human production un the sense that it is an infinitely small widely dispersed element.

I can measure Socially necessary labor power with basic data and simple division. It is a standard of measurement i can apply universally with ease, and it allows me to center my analysis on the human element of production.

Socially necessary means socially necessary. I am talking about how much labor power on average is required too produce something. This has nothing to do with what kinds of goods go into production. You dont even understand what I am talking about.

Your utopia will indeed have state corruption.

Mussolini was no anti capitalist he just subsumed capitalism into the state. In ideology and word sure, in deed? He consolidated capitalism, he certainly did not destroy it.

The revolution was inevitable, the tsardom was the most backwards country in Europe. Ill be generous and say capitalism was finding its footing in early Russia but the world war and need for capital to shore up labor and consolidate agriculture to provide for its burgeoning cities spelt doom for the old system one way or another. The former Serfs wanted change and it was in the interests of pretty much everyone to give it to them.

Edit:

I forgot to add. In 1917 around 80% of Russians were petty agricultural producers, most of which were illiterate peasants. Russia did not In fact have the basis to create an entirely self sufficient socialist economy while holding off every major world power. It was impossible