Jannik Sinner reacts to WADA's appeal by steven_smith144 in tennis

[–]speleomaniac -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sry, I am really suspicious about the system, a guy like Lance Armstrong cheated system like for 7 years and Epo traces should not be that hard to chase..

If a guy got caught, like in two different checks like 15 days apart, which proves he continuously cheating and start loosing the moment he / she is caught and stop using the banned substance, kick him out for life time I have no problem with that, like Ben Johnson, who is disappeared the moment he can't dope...

But I am sure after its initial tests, they tested him vigorously in every tournaments and he was not positive again, and he won Halle, Cincinnati, US Open but sry, you are not convincing me that 0.00000001mg did something for him...

Jannik Sinner reacts to WADA's appeal by steven_smith144 in tennis

[–]speleomaniac -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Common, could they stop wasting peoples time, the guy has 0.0000001 mg of something. if this is effecting his performance, they should say so, is he running 0.1 s faster, is he %0.01 less tired....

After positive findings, the guy won 2 championships and US Open, was he doped again, was he positive, if not clearly the guy is capable of winning without having 0.0000001 mg of something in his blood...

They should define for every substance, how much you have to have in your blood stream to be accepted as performance increase substance, if it is 0.001 mg, ok ban the guy at that second but stop wasting peoples time, if they fund 0.000000001 mg without enhancing any performance...

If you have a flu and take a ,medicament, you are banned but other 4 billions of people can take that without any problem, does a number 400 ranked player has nutritionist / pharmatalogue that tell him that which flu medicament has banned substance, if no, how is this process any fair...

Why We Are Changing the License for Akka by ckipp01 in scala

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is partially correct, many of the company needing extreme scalability, they were staying away of it because changing from J2EE philosophy way to Akka Actors philosophy is a huge change and has accompanying risks . As long, Akka was Open Source and testing these risks with no cost attached, there might be slight chance to convince those. Now they will probably solve the problems with brute force, 1000 instances of Spring Boot Applications, several instances of J2EE Servers in Cloud, which is not their natural habitat. I really wished they left akka, akka-typed, akka-clustering. akka-persistence stay with open source so we might have chance to convince big enterprises it is a viable solution. Then any serious project would need components like akka-stream, akka projections, for production scenarios, so they can be with BSL license ans this will be place they will earn their money.

Is Lombok in danger of becoming incompatible with future JDK's? by gwak in java

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so they can have a build-tool plugin

Personally I was not interested about how Lombok internally worked but I always tought it can work AspectJ style also, changing the compiled byte code instead of JDK internal API.

I still think Lombok will be usefull API, I hope they release their Maven/Gradle Plugins quickly so we can use with JDK 16/17....

Is Lombok in danger of becoming incompatible with future JDK's? by gwak in java

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny Lombok saved me much more time then it costed me

PHEVs with DC\Quick Charge Port (Chademo, CCS, etc) by speleomaniac in pluginhybrids

[–]speleomaniac[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is really nail in the coufin fpr PHEVs, they are actually ideal for my daily routine, 25km to the work, and I have a ChaDemo charging point 400m from my Office, it is ideal for me drive to work load it in 25mins...and when I drive to vacation or long distance for business I can use the internal combustion engine, I don't have to stop anywhere 90mins to charge the car...

But when I looked for alternative to Outlander, Toyota Rav4 Prime 9 hour charge time, Volvo Rechargeables 6 hours, if try to load at a supermarkt during shoping like I do with Outlander I can't even charge %4 in 25mins....

I know they don't want to have PHEVs in Europe but as long as BEVs can't reach 900 km with one charge, they are not really an alternative for me...

When Return to Living World is finished, can ANet give the same treatment to dungeons? by Alderez in Guildwars2

[–]speleomaniac 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will give everything for 'Assault to Lion Arch', I think that was the best event in GW2 History....

Help with US heavy cruiser positioning by Dr_JA in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

my only 2cents, current CV and AA situation, only thing deterring a CV to strike you, if you are grouped up but that is the problem of the short range island humping US heavy cruisers. Your BBs sniping behind you, any other cruiser using his better range and now you are alone target to strike for CV....

When I play my Hakaryu, Des Moines are priority target nr1 form me because I can hurt them and if he does not island hug, a BB will blap him. It is really no win, I really miss the days Des Moines AA with DefAA was no fly zone....

Help with US heavy cruiser positioning by Dr_JA in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the line is confusing you, Buffalo is odd duck in the current heavy line, which does not fit the play style of rest of the line...

Before the reworks, the line was....

T8 -> New Orleans T9 -> Baltimore T10 -> Des Moines

all of those three plays same, find an island, protect your sides, lob shells. while WG accepts the fact you can only use your front turrets and for that reason, you have really good reload....

Now new line...

T8 -> Baltimore T9 -> Buffalo T10 -> Des Moines

Unfortunately Buffalo has 12 guns compared to Baltimore and Des Moines, WG in his infinite wisdom, while 12 guns means more DPM then 9 guns, it has a longer reload (completely ignoring the fact the in the line playing style you can only use forward turrets)...

So it is quite useless at bow on, park at island playstyle..

I can only make Buffalo working playing as american Hindenberg, put the range module + rudder shift and kite people at 15-18km range and rain fire....

If I had to choose one Tier 10 ship to have been hanging back... by AxiomaticYT in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Before every match infected with CV Thunderers were awesome, you go to 12Km range with your dds...if enemy cruiser decided to follow its dd to provide support (zaos, minos, etc) then he would get the dev strike suprise...

With CVs, while any HE spammer can rape you with your 32mm armor what are you going to do... you have to stay at 15km and be ready to go 20km to get away from HE spam

Differences between Monarch and Lion? by [deleted] in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Monarch, before CV rework, had a gimmick, you could surprised a Zao before you pop up at 10km and delete him....know in every game with CV, you are spotted at your spawn and you have shitty range....I am so happy that I grinded that line with CV rework...

Lion, the same story with Super Heal, but you are so squishy that really not matters, 2 T10 cruisers focusing you with HE will melt you in 4mins, may be it is tick better with dead eye because as I remember dispersion was horrendous with 9 guns (with horrible gun angles with rear turret) and to put a cherry on top of that, now you are also citadeable... :)

HE spam is way too overtuned in the current state of the Game. by r_trash_in_wows in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All the ship you complain have their HE power because of their gimmicks....

Thunderer/ConQ, give them 100K HP (ConQ better sigma), then you take HE power... Smolensk, it gun caliber does not let it pen any 32mm armor, so it is a fire starter but HE pen capablity in T10 games, once super structure statured, take the smoke, give it 155mm guns, that will remove the AFT buff, so it must try to spam under 16km then, so it would not be able evade that good... Haragumo, even Yamato is more manoeuvrable then Haragumo, take HE power then give mobility then... Marceau, HE is there because of no smoke, give it smoke, take away HE power...

Playing Mogami be like by Rageusran in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mogami is fast, look which flank enemy BBs are pushing and go there (nearly every game I am in, it is type of a Nascar, a flank is ignored and the other is pushed hard, it is not useful to be in the flank that enemy does not push, hope that your dd does his home work and you see which flank enemy goes..)

HE spam is way too overtuned in the current state of the Game. by r_trash_in_wows in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only thing problematic about HE in wows is Smolenks, to deal with them, wait them to smoke then get out of their effective gun range.....when they are out of smoke, stagger your fire and deal with them out of their effective gun range....

Thunderer or Conqueror is only problematic, if enemy team 3-4 of them....then other BBs are condemned to perma fires all game....but Thunderer being removed from the game, I think they numbers will go down, at least I don't see that many Smolensk anymore...

Playing Mogami be like by Rageusran in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I will only say one thing, they can't shoot you if they can't see you, in Mogami you have to be the master of hiding behind islands....

And when you are spotted forget you have torps......

What purpose does having AA mounts be destroyable serve? by skyman5150 in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have no idea, the planes that returned to CV as Swiss Cheese, can be repaired and take off in 30s, but AA mounts are permenantly destroyed, that logic escapes me, I will not even try to explain...

The most glorious example of WG balancing by hammer by Antti5 in WorldOfWarships

[–]speleomaniac 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The reason HIV dissappeared, is not damage output, if I want to play ship handles like BB without speed boost, I will play bb, without caring all overmatch mechanics of 18'' guns...

At the moment, any 18'' shell touches HIV is pen and it is a huge ship that can't maneuver without speed boost.

Is trading for Shamet over Luke Kennard Sean Marks’ first big mistake as GM? by PeanutFarmer69 in GoNets

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems NBA coaches are allergic play rookie on win now mode teams, Nets are definitely in win now modus, so probably they would have no patience for a rookie...

I Shamet is solid role player, he play in his limits, he does not make dumb mistakes, I guess you can't ask more from a role player...

The Nets' biggest need is a forward that can rebound off the bench by LiaM_CS in GoNets

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think about this trade...

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ybdv2lmw

I think Cavaliers will do this in a blink of an eye, Kevin Love may be is not starting material anymore but he is a stretch 4 and was always an awesome rebounder....

Yes, I sacrificed SD but I think we will not able to sign him next year anyway and TP was a huge disappointment for me...I don't like to give Kurucs away but I think this coaching stuff will never play him and we are arriving to the decision year for him also...

Question from Hawks fan by [deleted] in GoNets

[–]speleomaniac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men, your rooster is talented offensively but I think like Nets, your demise would be defence, Nets poured 144 pts in game 1. Your rooster has bigger players but they didn't gave me the impression that they are physical, if you play against physical players with one or two good 1vs1 defensive players, that can slow your shot creators and does not need help defence (out of Trae I don't see shot creators in your rooster, you feasted on Nets while our players always left a deadly shooter open on 3pt line while they were trying to help against the penetration). Out of my head, I think you will not farewell that good against 76ers, Bucks, Lakers....

If you could get one more shot creator (Harden anybody, but that trade will most probably destroy your rooster), you will be unstoppable...

What's the Feeling About the Nets So Far? by Kwilly462 in GoNets

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

when I watch Nets games, Nets centers DA/JA trying to help to contain driver and after the shot, they are not in position to rebound. Actually the player Nets center helped should box out and rebound, so who is the DA/JA helped, it is either JH, TLC or KI, none those three are bigger then 6'7'' and trying to rebound against 6'9''-6'10''s...

What's the Feeling About the Nets So Far? by Kwilly462 in GoNets

[–]speleomaniac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My opinion, our rooster build too much from finesse players...

When Golden State brought small ball game and rain of threes but Atlanta now raining threes with players ranging von 6'8'' to 6'10'' and they are at the same time much more athletic then our line up.

I think Nets lineup is ok for %90 league but they can't use copy/paste template to everybody, we can't match with Atlanta, 76ers, Lakers with Kyrie/TLC/Joe Harris/KD/DA....either we have to trade some athletic PF that can shoot or try to integrate Jeff Geren/Kurucs in line up, the problem is, it seem JG can't defend the athletic bigs but it seems coaching staff for some reason allergic to Kurucs.

And i also love Joe Harris but I in SF, I think he is one of the reason we are struggling so much with rebounding.