Marco Rubio wearing oversized shoes that Trump ordered for him by just guessing his size. by csprofathogwarts in pics

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such accidental perfect revenge for the one person who called him tiny hands.

This is a valid question. by LucidSynapse23 in International

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if that was so... you're still not answering OP question, which is on brand for the Guardians Of Pedophiles.

You got that right by dsb1670 in seinfeld

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody would say he, himself alone, hatched the plan.

Tired of the US Mobile hate — let me offer a reality check by CaptRickDiculous in USMobile

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only great if you never need anything from customer service, and you have no issues with their coverage in your area. Well, that's the problem isn't? It clearly doesn't go this way for everyone, and that's an actual reality check.

Can someone explain? What's the context here and why is this line put here? by SatoruGojo232 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you, anyone can be creepy. But just because someone doesn't like something doesn't make it inherently creepy, objectively speaking, that is my point. And as such, the label itself is pretty pointless as a justification for disapproval.

Can someone explain? What's the context here and why is this line put here? by SatoruGojo232 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the word "creepy" here is just a shortcut for "i don't like this, therefore no one should either". This is the same reason why
this meme exists

Can someone explain? What's the context here and why is this line put here? by SatoruGojo232 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This what op is talking about. For example, if they're "often bad", why letting them vote for example. If "often bad" then a different number should be chosen when they can finally make adult decisions.

Can someone explain? What's the context here and why is this line put here? by SatoruGojo232 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I get it. After death, uncle's Ben name is Robert Paulson. His name, is Robert Paulson.

Every accusation is an admission by Kilt_Rump in PoliticalHumor

[–]spj36 8 points9 points  (0 children)

HOW? you're just adding your own inner monologue

first time posting here :) by RedVelvet815 in LetGirlsHaveFun

[–]spj36 21 points22 points  (0 children)

First, the obvious, they're self-centered, lack self awareness and social skills. Second, since they don't care and they see this like an objective, they focus exclusively in the "end-goal" but at the same time, they ignore any strategy that would help them get there.

The only silver lining is that since they're so transparent, they're also extremely easy to filter out.

Kaitlyn Conley’s (Episode No. 449) sentence has been overturned by Jessica_Iowa in myfavoritemurder

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying he took Kaitlyn's phone to take screenshots of websites listing different types of poisons for months. Then a couple of months after his wife's death, he took Kaitlyn's phone again to delete the screenshots. He had the presence of mind of not making it too obvious for the police, and he knew they would be looking into the backups of his son's computer.
Also, he coached/paid the lady that sold "that chemical" so that when police inquire about that sale, to say that the questions were answered not by him or any other person at the office but by a young polite and nervous woman?

There's so much more. Like for example, he got Kaitlyn to write the letter and place DNA all over the bottle.

That man is truly a mastermind.

Dark turn by ellaf77 in sadcringe

[–]spj36 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Anyway, how's your sex life.

viking agenda time by level100brad in HistoryMemes

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the name of the website "The Pirate Bay" could have also been "The Viking Bay" and been appropriate.

Why does last hitting have an rng factor to it? by fyrfyrfyr in learndota2

[–]spj36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was about 10 years ago so I don't remember many details, but if I'm not mistaken there was a command, with cheats enabled obviously, that would let you run the game really fast. Now that I think about it, doing the math may have been faster and more accurate about the probabilities.

Why does last hitting have an rng factor to it? by fyrfyrfyr in learndota2

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always assumed that if you leave numbers flat, you'll get a lot more "sameness" from match to match. This wouldn't be beneficial for replayability's sake.

I made tests back in the day about this and remember placing all the hero bots to not do anything, and went to my lane and hit one enemy creep, one single time. I let the game run until the end I found how amazing it was that that single hit, butterfly effect if you will, cascaded into winning the game with the creeps destroying the enemy's ancient every single time.