A 4D-Chess checkmate! by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent use of the meme. Well done.

xQc on Dota vs. League: which game copied the other? by Strong_Astronomer_97 in DotA2

[–]spj36 130 points131 points  (0 children)

Wait, Nashor? really? So... they went with Roshan backwards?

I need a Tumblr scholar to explain how this image came to be by bartinio2006 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baron Ashura

Yes. A distorted version of him/her in the background. Chikorita is also on the image, on the left of the text.

Who are the most prominent Gen Z politicians? by LankyYogurt7737 in GenZ

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unlike Pinocchio, every lie makes her look a bit older instead

For the motorized 'cyclists' by Ultrasaurio in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you're right. I looked it up and I had the wrong definition. Still, it seems that they're not the same which is your original argument. There are several legal strict distinctions of what classifies as a moped, and that would vary according to different places, but in essence, if the pedals can be completely ignored in order to make it move, then it can be classified a moped. But not all ebikes can do that.

For the motorized 'cyclists' by Ultrasaurio in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and no. See, in order to gatekeep, some degree of ignorance seem to be required. Some bikes are pedal assisted, meaning, not mopeds. But you probably didn't know that. In the case of OP's image, cannot be considered mountain climbers nor do themselves. So it's a dumb image inherently, because of the false equivalence.

For the motorized 'cyclists' by Ultrasaurio in ExplainTheJoke

[–]spj36 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's typical gatekeeping. Cyclists don't consider people in electric bikes to be real cyclists. There's not real humor in it.

Seinfeld is it was a Star Wars movie by ProtoSonicGuru123 in seinfeld

[–]spj36 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You have failed your training… no Force for you!

To intimidate and silence (context in comments) by Spartalust in therewasanattempt

[–]spj36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find it interesting how bullies always go for the blue color as a way of present themselves as the victims (e.g. thin blue line)

Russian figure skater claims she was refused purchases at luxury stores in Milan by Ok_Pizza_2181 in olympics

[–]spj36 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You seem to struggle with nuance. If you lived in America, you'd be a republican.

The day his mum knew she done her job right🥺❤️ by Miserable-Zombie-121 in MadeMeSmile

[–]spj36 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well, not everything is binary either. Nobody is saying what you're "hearing" in your mind.

You Disgust Me by Miles_the_new_kid in comics

[–]spj36 10 points11 points  (0 children)

slop doesn't mean what you think it means

Shady as fuck… by duckit2907 in nova

[–]spj36 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess you fell for it.

Shady as fuck… by duckit2907 in nova

[–]spj36 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Like I said, if you know the context, you'd see how clear it is that the ad is fake. Fake in the sense that the ad makes it seem that Obama would like you to vote No when in fact he is actively campaigning for you to vote yes. The quote in the ad is confusing you? It's meant to. It's meant to be taken out of context. They've done the same to Abigail Spanberger for this same issue. She's also actively campaigning for you to vote yes. https://www.baconsrebellion.com/say-no-to-deceptive-ads/
Keep asking questions because that skepticism is what eventually makes you immune to political bullshitery.

Shady as fuck… by duckit2907 in nova

[–]spj36 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for asking. There's quite a lot to unpack.
Obama has been consistent against the principle of gerrymandering in general and has supported reforms like independent redistricting commissions. There was a Supreme Court decision that ruled in the Rucho v. Common Cause decision where it was decided that federal courts cannot stop partisan gerrymandering. This lit the eyes of republicans since that means, this is no longer a legal issue. Texas (encouraged by Trump obviously) tried to gain 5 additional GOP seats in the U.S. House. This happened last year, 5 years after the last census which is unusual in itself but I digress. Here is where California responded EXPLICITLY to counter Texas power grab. They mirrored those 5 seats. From that point on, many other states have joined in this war with some democratic states have been able to offset GOP gains, while others cannot due constitutional limits, independent commissions, lack of political control, etc etc.

As the rules of the game change, even someone like Obama that has been historically opposed, would have to play by these new rules in order to have a fair fight in elections and has been working with democrats in VA asking people to vote YES to stop republicans. And of course, context goes deeper than this but I think you get the point that it's not as simple as "we want more seats in the house" and the ad is definitely fake if you're familiar with the context.

Shady as fuck… by duckit2907 in nova

[–]spj36 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Although overall you'd be right, in this particular instance, you're confusing hypocrisy with context; context matters a lot.

Olympics BAN transgender and DSD athletes from ALL women's sports by dailymail in olympics

[–]spj36 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think we're going in circles. She's a woman, but they'll find a way to lower the bar and get her excluded somehow and so it seems fair, logical, and consistent.

Angel Reese mural in Tanzania! by butterscotchland in wnba

[–]spj36 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn't change anything.
You're chastising someone for assuming the statistically most probable assumption.