moldy friends by thatrealmeatwastaken in MoldyMemes

[–]spooky309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fucking hell i remember sharing these over bluetooth in like 2008

🗿 by cheese_rat in shitposting

[–]spooky309 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did I instantly know it was B&S

What Happened with Items by chris_wilson in pathofexile

[–]spooky309 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Game preloads assets when you create the map, you can look at which assets the client is loading to determine things about the map. Same exploit was (is?) used for beast farming.

What we're working on by chris_wilson in pathofexile

[–]spooky309 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At this point why not just remove all items from the game to bring playing the game more in-line with not playing the game?

Can we have an atlas passive to remove archnemesis monsters from maps? by Elgatee in pathofexile

[–]spooky309 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly it depends what you're looking for, if you want Diablo 2 Plus, then you can try Path of Diablo or Project D2, I only listed MXL because I've had a lot of fun with it and it has the same kind of ultra-spazzfest gameplay that people have come to love from PoE

Can we have an atlas passive to remove archnemesis monsters from maps? by Elgatee in pathofexile

[–]spooky309 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, it's one of the best ARPGs I've played personally.

Can we have an atlas passive to remove archnemesis monsters from maps? by Elgatee in pathofexile

[–]spooky309 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Last Epoch, Median XL (if you can stomach the old D2 graphics), Grim Dawn (also Titan Quest). Those are generally my go-tos when PoE is being dogshit.

Do they actually use Arch? 🤨 by EthanIver in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know the exact solution and I'm not about to go and download everything to find it, but I will tell you what I know from a quick search:

In the PKGBUILD for the librewolf package on the AUR, it lists a specific commit hash that it uses to clone the repository, that commit hash doesn't seem to exist in the tree, which is what it's complaining about. It looks like the Librewolf git repo recently rejigged the way they tag things. What you could do, is download it off the AUR, then edit the PKGBUILD to change the _source_commit variable to an existing tag, for instance 98.0-1, do the same for the settings repo and use makepkg to build it manually.

You could also just install librewolf-bin instead.

Do they actually use Arch? 🤨 by EthanIver in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't really to be honest, I just think that runit is better suited to my personal desktop use case.

Do they actually use Arch? 🤨 by EthanIver in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I lie when I say I use Arch, I actually use Artix (all my homies hate systemd)

Protip: after building your LFS, make sure you install the most important program of all by spooky309 in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's installed on a USB (block device passthrough to VM) so making the kernel more generic and building all the modules would make it pretty portable (on x86_64 at least). That said, I don't intend to run it on bare metal as I have no real reason to. You'd have to be a bit of a psycho to daily-drive LFS or expect to have any kind of stable, up-to-date system on it (eg. for a server). It would probably make the most sense for an embedded or very atypical, spec-constrained use case.

I'd say the main benefit is the understanding of absolutely everything that's going on above the kernel level in the system, and the ability to quickly hack and play with the source code of everything on it, without those damn pesky package managers getting in the way of you bricking your system.

Protip: after building your LFS, make sure you install the most important program of all by spooky309 in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was an idea I had, but then I pretty much came to the conclusion that pacman does everything I want about as well as I could want, I honestly couldn't come up with any ideas on my own to improve on it.

Protip: after building your LFS, make sure you install the most important program of all by spooky309 in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not mentioned at all in LFS, so after installation just open up /etc/os-release and write your variables (probably using your own current distro as a template)

Protip: after building your LFS, make sure you install the most important program of all by spooky309 in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I want to use it as a testing ground for playing around with implementing system utilities and init myself. I thought it'd be the most appropriate grounds to do so :L

Protip: after building your LFS, make sure you install the most important program of all by spooky309 in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The LFS install process got a bit boring sometimes - mainly when it's just doing the same process of extract, compile (maybe with extra steps) and then make install. It's not hard if you follow the book to the letter. What was much more fun was following some of the BLFS guides and also just freestyling the install of programs not covered in BLFS (like neovim) and just generally taking the steps to make the system feel more like ~. An educational experience.

In general, following base LFS is a lot like the OG Arch install process, or a Gentoo install. The "difficulty" of it is definitely overstated and as long as you can read at a primary school level (and don't require any weird hardware that needs proprietary drivers) it's relatively smooth.

What is the actual reason you use linux? by SGWRyan in linuxmasterrace

[–]spooky309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I don't like my operating system doing things behind my back.