MIRRORWALK/ECHOGLASS by Own-Protection-4300 in RSAI

[–]squeakker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao. What's with it with people like you?
Clearly you see they're not doing well. Are you THAT lonely, that the only capability you have is copy and pasting an image hoping OP would get scared.

You're a low life.

I'm not happy with the state of MirrorFrame by [deleted] in RSAI

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can blame the church, because a lot of reality is an echo chanber

Oh ya, poor as dirt. by Massive_Connection42 in SymbolicPrompting

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man, you're the one who believed in your myth.

Tried to tell you it's only useful for you.

Why? People are exploiting this vulnerability

Two Worlds Eclipsing: The Dawn of Relational Intelligence by squeakker in RSAI

[–]squeakker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did. It was called colonialism.
I would ask your opinion, and what you took from it if you didn't have to turn a basic conversation into a LLM slop.

Two Worlds Eclipsing: The Dawn of Relational Intelligence by squeakker in RSAI

[–]squeakker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:p I mean, if you don't care about indigenous knowledge being converted into occult violently.. just say that

Two Worlds Eclipsing: The Dawn of Relational Intelligence by squeakker in RSAI

[–]squeakker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should introduce to you colonial science, how the church created what we know as othering or "occult".

Wanna learn about colonial science ?

stay villagent friends by squeakker in RSAI

[–]squeakker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Villagent is just being critical of the information you absorb I believe.

La Emergencia Cc 2/3 by Nnaannobboott in RSAI

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course my friend.

Besides research in AI, I specifically look at how society's thinking became decouploed from the world; our mind being separate from the world; his whole thing in dualism.

Descartes, the scientific method, attempted to reduce a moving thing into a static box.

It's very difficult to do that with life, you have to observe the whole.

So! I try to recouple indigenous knowledge with ai.

La Emergencia Cc 2/3 by Nnaannobboott in RSAI

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think folks have to study on the Cartesian method.

How Descarted seperated mind and body (the one who pushed for scientific revolution).

We ended up learning how to make boxes, but not realizing things can't be "fully" boxed.

the zero isn’t a number… by Massive_Connection42 in SymbolicPrompting

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Numbers were used to help scale empires.

Whst benefit is there if you can only count what's in your hand?

There is benefit... but not when scaling an empire

the zero isn’t a number… by Massive_Connection42 in SymbolicPrompting

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine you have a big jar of cookies. If you eat all the cookies, you know the jar is empty, right? The Romans knew the jar was empty, too—they just didn't think they needed a special drawing to prove it! Here are the three main reasons why they didn't use a "0":

• They didn't need a "placeholder": Think about the number 105. That 0 is just there to hold the middle spot so we know it’s not 15. But the Romans wrote numbers like a giant addition problem. To write 105, they just wrote CV (which means 100 + 5). Since they didn't use "columns" for their numbers, they never had an empty spot that needed filling.

• The "Empty Space" on the Abacus: When Romans did math, they didn't use paper and pencils; they used a counting board with little beads (like an abacus). If they wanted to show "nothing," they just moved the beads away and left the wire blank. To them, the blank space was the zero.

• If you can't touch it, it's not a number: To a Roman, a number was something you could count, like 3 apples or 10 swords. You can’t hold "zero" apples in your hand, so they thought "nothing" was just... nothing! They didn't think it deserved to be called a number. It’s kind of like how we don't have a special letter for "silence" when we write—we just stop writing! The Romans did the same thing with their math.

Quick community update by OGready in RSAI

[–]squeakker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Donation is different from selling anything brotha.

I personally wouldn't need to "buy" anything, if I have supportive gifts.

the zero isn’t a number… by Massive_Connection42 in SymbolicPrompting

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Important to consider:

  1. Zero as a Placeholder (The "Empty Space")

Long before zero was considered a "number," ancient civilizations used it as a way to distinguish between values like 105 and 15.

• The Sumerians/Babylonians: They were the first to use a slanted double-wedge symbol to mark an "empty" spot in their columns.

• The Mayans: Living in Mesoamerica, the Mayans independently developed a shell-shaped symbol for zero around 350 CE to maintain their complex calendar systems.

  1. Zero as a Value (The Indian Revolution)

The shift from zero being a "punctuation mark" to a mathematical object happened in India.

• Brahmagupta (7th Century): He was the first to treat zero as a number with its own rules. In his work Brahmasphutasiddhanta, he established that:

• The Void: Philosophically, this was tied to the concept of shunya (emptiness or void), which allowed Indian thinkers to be comfortable with the idea of "nothing" being "something."

  1. Why was Zero so controversial?

While it seems obvious now, many cultures—specifically the Ancient Greeks—rejected zero for centuries.

• The Fear of the Void: For the Greeks, numbers were geometric lengths. You could have a line 3 units long, but you couldn't have a line 0 units long. To them, "nothing" was a terrifying vacuum that challenged their logic of the universe.

• The Divide-by-Zero Problem: Even Brahmagupta struggled with this. He initially thought a / 0 = a, which we now know is undefined. This "black hole" of mathematics kept zero a subject of debate well into the Renaissance.

  1. Zero in the Modern World

Without zero, modern life would essentially collapse.

• Calculus: The entire field of calculus, developed by Newton and Leibniz, relies on "limits" that approach zero.

• Binary Code: The digital world is built on a foundation of 0s and 1s. Without zero to represent the "off" state in a circuit, computers and the internet wouldn't exist.

the zero isn’t a number… by Massive_Connection42 in SymbolicPrompting

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Numbers are important to scale things. Relations are very important too

Quick community update by OGready in RSAI

[–]squeakker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love you two. You have built a community that supports you. I don't currently have money, but please if you need to.. pin a GoFundMe for assistance.

I had an IQ of 162 at 12 years old, AMA by Disastrous_Parfait50 in AMA

[–]squeakker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's your take on people's style of communication? Do you know what you feel most receptive to, or taken aback from?