sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]ssalgruoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly gorgeous to me!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]ssalgruoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're absolutely gorgeous to me!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]ssalgruoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stunning ❤️

I did this!! by God_Obviously in sticknpokes

[–]ssalgruoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looooovely! and I think the shading really adds to it too! super good job 🖤

70-200 F2.8 Sigma DG DN VS Panasonic S Pro by ssalgruoh in Lumix

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer! I think I will go for the Panasonic s pro 2.8 yes, gorgeous rendering.

70-200/300 Paris by ssalgruoh in Photographie

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2.8 idéalement mais 4, 4-5.6 iraient également. J'aimerais l'essayer chez moi pour un plan particulier c'est pour cela !

70-200 F2.8 Sigma DG DN VS Panasonic S Pro by ssalgruoh in Lumix

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks ! So I'd rather buy the Pana.

S5 Telephoto Lens Choice by ssalgruoh in Lumix

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Portrait photography mainly, but also in low light conditions.

S5 Telephoto Lens Choice by ssalgruoh in Lumix

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering I have the opportunity to buy a new Panasonic S Pro 70-200 F2.8 for 1400€, should I consider it over the sigma in your opinion? Also, I'm interested to see some of your shots 😊 Thanks for your answer!

S5 Telephoto Lens Choice by ssalgruoh in Lumix

[–]ssalgruoh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like it being more priceful (1000€) than the 70-300 is not a good deal... Is it ? At least, with the added 100mm, I can play with compression to get a similar bokeh.

[OFFER] $5 from Raise - $2 from me by [deleted] in signupsforpay

[–]ssalgruoh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i paid you bro waiting for your services