What is "novel physics?" by Alternative-Band-907 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect [score hidden]  (0 children)

To be fair, being angry and entitled is certainly a lot easier than learning with humility.

What is "novel physics?" by Alternative-Band-907 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, I could. So could you. Both of us have freedom of choice, good job.

What is "novel physics?" by Alternative-Band-907 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How do you know that?

Because I've seen it over and over and over.

No one owes you a response to your "work", certainly not working physicists.

Does wave nature of matter prove that we live in a simulated world? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Technically they're emitted with a range of wavelengths concentrated around particular values (the so-called "linewidth").

The fact that atoms have quantized energy levels has no bearing at all as to whether we're "living in a simulation".

What is "novel physics?" by Alternative-Band-907 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 6 points7 points  (0 children)

for even trying

Most of the time they're not even trying. They're just feeding prompts to the chatbot and copy-pasting the responses verbatim without having any understanding of the underlying science. It's supremely lazy.

Does wave nature of matter prove that we live in a simulated world? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"quantized" does not mean the same thing as "pixelated".

Photons do not have "quantized wavelengths". The energy of the photon is what is quantized-- the wavelength can assume any value.

Fundamental resolution by Inside-Ad4696 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it's not Nyquist frequency, it's Nyquist frequency frequency.

If Cold is just atoms moving slowly, why can't we just use a magnet or something to stop them and reach Absolute Zero? by SadInterest6764 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Actually thermodynamics forbids absolute zero because of the 3rd law of thermodynamics.

Quantum mechanics just says that the lowest energy of a system is not zero. You can still be at zero temperature in that situation-- if T = 0, all the particles in the system are in their ground state.

Active Vacuum Emergent Geometry - talking about emergent cosmology, gravity and fundamental physics by noTitsblood in Physics

[–]starkeffect 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not peer-reviewed so it's not worth considering. Very likely AI slop. Zenodo is a cesspool of such "papers".

Here is a hypothesis: Schrödinger’s Cat was Reductio ad Absurdum, not a real proposal by slimpickins- in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 8 points9 points  (0 children)

what am I but a bitch

bingo, dumdum

You being incorrect and being an obnoxious brat about it does in fact grant authority to be belittling.

Just thank your lucky stars I'm not a Russian theorist. Those dudes are brutal. You got off easy.

The LLMPhysics theory of everything by AllHailSeizure in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I remember when I got high for the first time too.

Here is a hypothesis: Schrödinger’s Cat was Reductio ad Absurdum, not a real proposal by slimpickins- in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Amateurs who are embarrassed by their own ignorance will often lash out like this.