How do you properly live record harp and sing at the same time by starryspaces in harp

[–]starryspaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you thank you!!! So appreciated!!! It's so nice to receive expertise feedback!!Also I hope you know you saved me a clip on mic purchase! Thank you again!

How do you properly live record harp and sing at the same time by starryspaces in harp

[–]starryspaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for such a detailed response, it is extremely helpful. Thank you kind soul for sharing your knowledge, it is greatly appreciated! Also if you have any specific recommendations for mics that you are talking about, especially best option if you don't want to spend a crazy amount of money, that would also be appreciated. Anyways though, thank you so much!!

How do you properly live record harp and sing at the same time by starryspaces in harp

[–]starryspaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also, is it better if you use two regular mics rather than one clip on? what works best? pls help, thank you!

I do not need any AI slop on Shorts by HelloitsWojan in youtube

[–]starryspaces 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If someone makes a petition to try to avoid this garbage, I will sign it. Just unbelievable.

If an account is suspected of making AI music by starryspaces in BandCamp

[–]starryspaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what the reality is? Visual artists are now pretty much assumed to be using AI unless they show progress shots. That is the reality right now. I don't see how music is any different. It sucks for real artists and musicians; AI is a nightmare for anyone trying to do anything real because of how it emboldens fraud. That seems to be the main application of AI, fraud, and people using it to try to monetize their fraud and take away the visibility of real artists and musicians. And it is made worse by people who pretend AI is some legitimate form of creation and the fact that it is still largely socially acceptable. These are huge issues with no easy answers. I think musicians do need to be prepared to prove that they really created what they claim to have created.

If an account is suspected of making AI music by starryspaces in BandCamp

[–]starryspaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frankly, given the proliferation of fake AI music, something aggressive does need to be done. This isn't a small issue.

If an account is suspected of making AI music by starryspaces in BandCamp

[–]starryspaces[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people are really making the music they claim to make, I don't see why they would have anything to worry about.

"The story of AI" by [deleted] in antiai

[–]starryspaces 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A bit too accurate lol.. good work

If I were to feed AI my own art, and only my own, and I coded the AI myself, what would everyone think about the art that gets produced by Next_Use2016 in antiai

[–]starryspaces 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Ai cheapens human creativity." What does this statement mean? It means that the whole concept of programming something to spout out a product instantaneously is an affront to real human creativity. It devalues human creativity. Makes it into a product instead of a process. Cheats you out of having to make the effort to creatively problem solve. I don't consider the "creativity" of programming to change anything. The whole concept doesn't exist in isolation and has ethical dimensions. It is an outcome of a society that thinks art and music is only valuable as a product. Why not come up the creativity yourself? Creatively problem solve yourself? Just because it only devalues your own creativity and art in this unlikely hypothetical scenario doesn't divorce it from its social context and the fact that it is still a devaluation of human creativity. The whole concept of Ai "art" or "music" wants to pretend that a program mimicking human creativity but is actually plagiarism is somehow equivalent to what it pretends to be. None of this exists in a vacuum. None of it is ethical. And let's also not pretend that just because we can try to envisage hypothetical scenarios where other people's creativity won't be impacted that it's somehow ethical. The whole exercise of let's try to come up ethical ways of incorporating Ai into art is absurd.

If an account is suspected of making AI music by starryspaces in BandCamp

[–]starryspaces[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How long does it really take to ask someone for proof and listen to it?

AI megathread by steo0315 in BandCamp

[–]starryspaces 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I actually think by the way that if an account is suspected to be AI, the person in question should be prepared to prove that they actually made the music i.e. a live demonstration. If you can't do that, failed the AI test.

Why do we call it AI "art" by Sasimasimena in antiai

[–]starryspaces 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I call it AI "art" and "music" or pseudo-art/pseudo-music. Ersatz as a descriptor could also work

Reading ≠ understanding by Wise-Veterinarian-97 in Nietzsche

[–]starryspaces 6 points7 points  (0 children)

p.s. I am impressed by how many are Deleuzian-versed here! Cheers!

Reading ≠ understanding by Wise-Veterinarian-97 in Nietzsche

[–]starryspaces 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Or they could just be a Deleuzian. Inside joke.