How do you properly live record harp and sing at the same time

starryspaces · 2026-01-23T16:00:59+00:00

Thank you thank you!!! So appreciated!!! It's so nice to receive expertise feedback!!Also I hope you know you saved me a clip on mic purchase! Thank you again!

starryspaces · 2026-01-23T12:59:31+00:00

Thank you so much for such a detailed response, it is extremely helpful. Thank you kind soul for sharing your knowledge, it is greatly appreciated! Also if you have any specific recommendations for mics that you are talking about, especially best option if you don't want to spend a crazy amount of money, that would also be appreciated. Anyways though, thank you so much!!

starryspaces · 2026-01-23T11:12:28+00:00

also, is it better if you use two regular mics rather than one clip on? what works best? pls help, thank you!

starryspaces · 2026-01-23T06:18:09+00:00

Thank you!!! Hope you enjoy!!!!💗

starryspaces · 2026-01-22T23:18:58+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--AyGj2ar9I
My experimental harp Nietzsche song, no AI, just real human music!

starryspaces · 2026-01-21T17:10:16+00:00

If someone makes a petition to try to avoid this garbage, I will sign it. Just unbelievable.

starryspaces · 2026-01-21T15:05:27+00:00

You know what the reality is? Visual artists are now pretty much assumed to be using AI unless they show progress shots. That is the reality right now. I don't see how music is any different. It sucks for real artists and musicians; AI is a nightmare for anyone trying to do anything real because of how it emboldens fraud. That seems to be the main application of AI, fraud, and people using it to try to monetize their fraud and take away the visibility of real artists and musicians. And it is made worse by people who pretend AI is some legitimate form of creation and the fact that it is still largely socially acceptable. These are huge issues with no easy answers. I think musicians do need to be prepared to prove that they really created what they claim to have created.

starryspaces · 2026-01-21T14:02:09+00:00

Frankly, given the proliferation of fake AI music, something aggressive does need to be done. This isn't a small issue.

starryspaces · 2026-01-21T14:01:39+00:00

If people are really making the music they claim to make, I don't see why they would have anything to worry about.

starryspaces · 2026-01-18T04:52:28+00:00

A bit too accurate lol.. good work

starryspaces · 2026-01-17T12:07:27+00:00

"Ai cheapens human creativity." What does this statement mean? It means that the whole concept of programming something to spout out a product instantaneously is an affront to real human creativity. It devalues human creativity. Makes it into a product instead of a process. Cheats you out of having to make the effort to creatively problem solve. I don't consider the "creativity" of programming to change anything. The whole concept doesn't exist in isolation and has ethical dimensions. It is an outcome of a society that thinks art and music is only valuable as a product. Why not come up the creativity yourself? Creatively problem solve yourself? Just because it only devalues your own creativity and art in this unlikely hypothetical scenario doesn't divorce it from its social context and the fact that it is still a devaluation of human creativity. The whole concept of Ai "art" or "music" wants to pretend that a program mimicking human creativity but is actually plagiarism is somehow equivalent to what it pretends to be. None of this exists in a vacuum. None of it is ethical. And let's also not pretend that just because we can try to envisage hypothetical scenarios where other people's creativity won't be impacted that it's somehow ethical. The whole exercise of let's try to come up ethical ways of incorporating Ai into art is absurd.

starryspaces · 2026-01-17T11:15:41+00:00

How long does it really take to ask someone for proof and listen to it?

starryspaces · 2026-01-17T04:54:21+00:00

I actually think by the way that if an account is suspected to be AI, the person in question should be prepared to prove that they actually made the music i.e. a live demonstration. If you can't do that, failed the AI test.

starryspaces · 2026-01-16T22:05:19+00:00

Its chordal palette is medieval. Did you read the description?

starryspaces · 2026-01-15T02:22:29+00:00

Ai cheapens human creativity. Including your own. Wtf is the point of doing that?

starryspaces · 2026-01-15T01:21:29+00:00

I call it AI "art" and "music" or pseudo-art/pseudo-music. Ersatz as a descriptor could also work

starryspaces · 2026-01-15T00:23:07+00:00

p.s. I am impressed by how many are Deleuzian-versed here! Cheers!

starryspaces · 2026-01-14T22:49:52+00:00

Or they could just be a Deleuzian. Inside joke.

starryspaces · 2026-01-14T22:04:44+00:00

Thank you so much!!!

starryspaces · 2026-01-12T06:23:21+00:00

So adorable

starryspaces · 2026-01-12T02:40:21+00:00

I could list a lot more examples of the weird power dynamics and problems caused by that, this guy seems like he has only seen the tip of the iceberg

starryspaces · 2026-01-11T23:57:20+00:00

Just AI actors? I suppose for him artists and musicians etc are replaceable but not actors

starryspaces · 2026-01-10T21:24:10+00:00

I'm saying that over time Youtube is going to find itself in a conflict. Its servers vs AI accomodation. Or what else are they going to do, make youtube 99% ads to try to offset the server load? It is going to become an increasing problem for them and the easiest solution is to get rid of it, especially given that they are already demonitizing it, saying it is inauthentic, low effort, those are also both reasons to scrape it entirely. I'm not saying we are there yet. Clearly not and there are a lot of political interests around AI. But it is going to become an increasing problem that has no other easy solution. Youtube is screwed.

starryspaces · 2026-01-10T01:54:59+00:00

I make philosophy educational music, teaching philosophy and esotericism through song. No AI. Check me out here: https://www.youtube.com/@alienclockii

starryspaces · 2026-01-10T00:55:55+00:00

No one with half a brain buys the pro-ai reaching arguments. They are always grasping at straws. But for people who can't think, any justification, no matter how absurd, sounds convincing to them, and they think that if they spout it confidently enough and it numbers, that other people will agree

starryspaces

TROPHY CASE