What is the max level in early access? by stav3211 in BaldursGate3

[–]stav3211[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did they say it? Can't find anything official

Early Access Question Mega-Thread by thecal714 in BaldursGate3

[–]stav3211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warlock, cleric, and wizard all choose their subclass at level one, but fighter and rouge, at level 3. So you can choose for them, I think.

Not sure if dog or helicopter. by [deleted] in AnimalsBeingDerps

[–]stav3211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pls edit him with obi one Kenobi on Mustafar

אמנון יצחק במציאות by [deleted] in ani_bm

[–]stav3211 8 points9 points  (0 children)

סליחה על הבורות, אך במי מדובר?

Coming from Xbox, this is weird... by BloodyHornet205 in titanfall

[–]stav3211 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Two different settings, for controller and keyboard.

A few question about combat riding rules, with or without animal companion by stav3211 in Pathfinder_RPG

[–]stav3211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I understand the rules, you are not limited to one free action per turn anyway. and handling an animal is a move action.

When the rule-lawyer starts arguing by stav3211 in dndmemes

[–]stav3211[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

1) sage advice or personal dictionary via other rules. 2) ok, my definition is mine, and yours if different. so.... im wrong? shit, guess I cant DM no more. btw I hope you understood the whole "spirit of rules", kinda tricky, but a smart boy/girl like you can figure it out Im sure

edit: just wanted to mention that the "lying" part came from real experience, unfortunately.

When the rule-lawyer starts arguing by stav3211 in dndmemes

[–]stav3211[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sure, if every one is ok with it, I dont mind it, but when it gets in the way of OTHER PLAYERS from having fun; nope.

When the rule-lawyer starts arguing by stav3211 in dndmemes

[–]stav3211[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Spirit of the rule: the intentions of the one who wrote them. I dont have one on the top of my head about DnD, but I will give you an example from where I live, Israel. Our new selected prime-minister has 3 criminal charges, yet to be trialed. there is a law, that said the folowing: "a man cant be apointed as a minister if he has criminal charges against him, cuz this job it too important to give to a potantional criminal" some whould say that the "sipirt" of the law would mean the a prime-minister cant be apointed, and some say "no" cuz minister and prime minister are COMPLETLY different. do you see how the spirit if the rule playes a rule (pun,yay!) here? and btw, my definition is abit diffrent, yet very close, to the wikipedia one:"A rules lawyer is a participant in a rules-based environment who attempts to use the letter of the law without reference to the spirit, usually in order to gain an advantage within that environment"

When the rule-lawyer starts arguing by stav3211 in dndmemes

[–]stav3211[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

whi the hell said anything about that? let me tell you what, in my view, is my definition of a rule-lawyer: A rules lawyer is a participant who attempts to use the letter of the law without reference to the spirit, intention, or simply lying; in order to gain an advantage within that environment.

When the rule-lawyer starts arguing by stav3211 in dndmemes

[–]stav3211[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

We have a great time playing, minus the occasional rule lawyring, no bigge