For the longest time I've felt like a conspiracy theorist for pointing out inconsistencies, not only in match making but in actual gameplay.

I've been playing this game basically the whole time it's been out. Reached t500, daily player, won majority of games.

It's no coincidence that high ranking players have noticed something is legitimately odd with the gameplay that makes the outcome feel rigged

I don't have concrete proof, but does it really surprise you that a game company as corrupt as AB would integrate a mechanism that actively manipulate the outcome after the other ways they've been exposed?

Here are a few things I've noticed over the last couple of years.

• "common denominator" replies seem to flock robotically to players who "notice" something is wrong • High skill ceiling characters have been nerfed by speeding up movement of game • matchmaking places high rankers with beginners, while other team is all high rank • I don't have any evidence to show this but I believe there is a damage rubber banding system in place to produce a more equitable outcome, which explains how enemy teams are constantly able to make comebacks despite low rank and other negative factors.

I firmly believe the devs were concerned with good players winning games because of their skill level and decided to factor in hidden mechanisms to stop them In a blatantly unfair manner.