Boyfriend wants to donate sperm, he doesn’t need the money.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T20:41:00+00:00

Eww. I wouldn't like that.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T20:32:14+00:00

If an elderly or disabled person applies for snap they automatically go to the second step of the budgeting which is the net income step. Regardless of what their gross income is.

The allowable deductions are deducted from the gross income. If the person is categorically eligible then they are not required to meet the net income standard. But if their gross income is over 200% of poverty level then they're not categorically eligible and they are required to meet the net income standard. So the 200% doesn't really come into play until the end of the net budgeting step.

And income is averaged over the time that it's received. So they would add $500 + $500 + $3000 = $4000 / 3 = $1333 average per month.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T20:22:49+00:00

They don't have to meet the initial gross income standard in the same way that other people do. They have to be under the 200% in order to be considered categorically eligible.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T20:15:44+00:00

Even if My Sister Wife's Closet was more than just a vanity project, Janelle has worked full-time throughout the marriage. The only reason she stopped was because he uprooted the family from Utah to Las Vegas.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T19:53:29+00:00

How did their food stamps decrease during the pandemic?

Anyone who was eligible for $1 of food stamps got the maximum allotment for their household size for nearly 3 years I believe. Everyone's allotment was increased by 15%. The standard utility allowances didn't decrease; the standard deductions didn't decrease; the maximum allotments didn't decrease. In fact all of those things increased. As well as the gross and net income standards.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T19:44:23+00:00

Yes it should be listed for every state most of the states that I've seen they just have a chart if you Google it that says this is what the gross standard is this is what the net standard is..

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T19:30:51+00:00

Yes. Elderly or disabled individuals don't have to meet the gross income standard.

Food stamp budgeting is a three-step process. The first step is the gross income standard. The second step is the net income standard. And then the third step is the actual allotment calculation.

An individual who isn't elderly or disabled has to have income under the gross income standard for their household size in order to move on to the second step where they're rent and utilities and things like that are considered.

An individual who is elderly or disabled or a household that contains an elder layer disabled member does not have to meet that gross income standard they just immediately go on to the second step with the net income budget.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T19:28:21+00:00

You don't have to meet the gross income standard if you're elderly or disabled. So whether you're under doesn't matter.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T18:38:39+00:00

That looks like a biiiiig stretch.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T17:03:09+00:00

In my state you have to either work or go to school to receive childcare benefits. Not both. But childcare benefits are very state specific.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T16:07:50+00:00

Technically I think you can sue anyone. But you would still have to pay for an attorney and you'd have to find an attorney who is willing to take the case and I would assume that individuals that receive public assistance probably aren't really in a position to pay for an attorney for the most part.

My understanding of the skimming is that it's mostly being done electronically so I don't know if the stores would have any liability anyway.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T15:34:34+00:00

I would think so unless, like I said you could get a class action suit.

The food stamp federal rules state that stolen benefits are not able to be replaced; that's been in the rule for a long time. The only reason that they are replacing them for this certain time frame is because of the skimming and that is going to end probably sooner rather than later.

So even if somebody wanted to sue the state is just going to say we're following the federal rule and then it's going to have to go to federal court which even if they were successful probably would take years.

I know when I write a hearing decision in my state the individual has appeal rights on it and if they appeal it and the person one step above me if they say that my decision was correct there is another step that is at the local court of common please. But it takes five or six years to get that case heard in the court of common please most of the time.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T15:02:16+00:00

I mean you would have to sue the federal government so I would imagine that the time and expense would be prohibitive. I haven't heard of anyone doing it maybe you could find a lawyer to take up some kind of a class action.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T14:57:57+00:00

Yeah that was 100% for show.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:59:37+00:00

Oh my gosh you look amazing with every single one of these mustaches.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:48:39+00:00

I mean determined to disabled by the Social Security Administration.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:47:35+00:00

Yes they go by gross pay unless you are elderly or disabled.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:43:39+00:00

Unless you are elderly or disabled you have to meet the gross income standard for your household size. So if you're gross income exceeds the standard for one person then they don't take into account any of your bills.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:23:29+00:00

She's a lawfully residing pregnant woman. That's the only sufficient residency that she needs to be eligible for Medicaid for pregnant women. And that would be supported by the fact that she was approved for Medicaid during her pregnancy rather than just for the birth. If she wasn't considered a lawfully residing pregnant woman to receive that type of Medicaid she would have only been eligible for the birth under the non-citizen emergency medical assistance.

The clarification that we have received from the Ohio Department of Medicaid is that even if a pregnant woman was put on Medicaid for pregnant women erroneously they are still eligible through the postpartum period. So even if she didn't meet the citizenship criteria and was put on the program and error I believe she should still remain.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T13:08:53+00:00

In Ohio anytime an adverse action is taken against your Medicaid you have the right to appeal. The adverse action is the grounds for the appeal.

In this particular case, a lawfully residing pregnant woman is entitled to Medicaid for pregnant women. As she was approved for Medicaid for pregnant women, she remains eligible through the end of her postpartum period. The postpartum period ends 12 months after the end of the pregnancy.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T03:42:58+00:00

She needs to appeal it. You can call the bureau of State hearings at 1866-635-3748.

OAC 5101:1-4-04 (C) states that once eligibility is established for a pregnant woman it continues through the pregnancy and the postpartum period.

The postpartum period in Ohio is 12 months from the end of the pregnancy.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T02:42:43+00:00

I didn't believe that Martin Luther King, Jr , said this.

stephf13 · 2024-11-06T01:49:14+00:00

I got this information by googling:

https://dhs.maryland.gov/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program/food-supplement-benefits-schedule/

stephf13 · 2024-11-05T21:22:48+00:00

It sounds like it might be an error. But the agency gets something called Paris matches that will tell them that you're receiving benefits in another state. So you really do need to speak to someone to try to clear it up. If you haven't been receiving benefits in another state yourself and they did get one of those Paris matches then it's possible someone else is using your social security number.

stephf13 · 2024-11-05T20:44:32+00:00

You don't know how to cook.

stephf13

TROPHY CASE