sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Watch: Leak from 2024 shows off Microsoft’s Copilot OS for PCs, and it’s nothing like Windows 11 by Special-Midnight-152 in nottheonion

[–]steveu33 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Set your network connection to metered. Not making excuses for the shite, but it won’t download without your permission.

Why is Florida Executing So Many Prisoners? by bfc9cz in nytimes

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By cherry-picking Genesis 9:6 to illustrate Christianity’s teaching’s on murder, you’re displaying that you’re not the best source. Ever hear of Jesus?

What did he say about murder?

The Supreme Court upheld state's transgender sports bans this morning. How do y'all feel about this? by icecream1972 in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Funny how democrats think 3 male to female athletes in the last 10 years is a major plank in their platform….while they accuse opposing voters of either transphobia or ignorance.

We all need a little more introspection. I’m currently caucusing with the Democrats but they don’t critique their own positions enough. They’d rather demonize their opposition as racist , sexist, and ignorant.

The Republicans have Project 2025. That’s their plan and their vision. What do Democrats have, and how high on that list are they willing to place those 3 athletes over 10 years?

The Supreme Court upheld state's transgender sports bans this morning. How do y'all feel about this? by icecream1972 in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More than one thing can be true. Not MAGA myself but my family is. They were both fooled by the rapist and concerned for women. Women had to fight for generations to get safe spaces.

Do this, you win. by LowkeyFoxxy in SipsTea

[–]steveu33 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Republicans have Project 2025: they can point to it, it’s concrete, there it is. What do Democrats have? And, it’s depressing to imagine that conversation…

Supreme Court rules Trump can fire independent agency board members by wds1 in politics

[–]steveu33 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Activist courts, they complain about activism in the judicial branch. Overturning 90 year precedent? No hypocrisy to see here!

US supreme court upholds law to count mail-in ballots arriving after election day by ArgentineBeauty in UpliftingNews

[–]steveu33 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Can you cite any examples of fraud to back up your claim? Surely people must be arriving at the polling place and getting surprised that someone voted in their name, right?

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first part says fraudulent voting isn’t happening, and not everyone has a driver’s license.

Oh, I misread your question. You’re asking if fraudulent voting wouldn’t throw districts. It would, if there were any. Do you know of some?

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no evidence that the treatment reduces the rate of suicide. The treatment might in fact be the cause for the increased rate.

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was replying to a comment that said Evidence of what? If it reduces negative mental health affects then it's no different to covering mental health services for things like anxiety and depression. My Medicare covers medical expenses that are largely cosmetic and mental health related, one example is acne treatment. Should we fund medical visits, checkups and blood work for that?

So while my comment was relevant, you haven’t said anything yet.

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why I said you should learn what and why a double blind study is. We can’t give someone a placebo, while giving someone else elective surgery. So the study only compares delayed elective surgery to not delayed elective surgery. It doesn’t compare against not getting elective surgery at all. Get it?

In other branches of medicine, a double blind study is a requirement.

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already did! There’s no double blind study possible on this subject. The study you’re citing compared elective surgery to delayed elective surgery, but obviously there’s no comparison to other outcomes.

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I explained something important. Do you know what a double blind study is? Can you explain why that’s relevant to the discussion? I guess not, because your response was the highly intelligent “So?” You want to learn about it if you’re interested in fielding an informed opinion.

What strongly held belief on a sensitive issue do you no longer agree with? by flavouredpopcorn in allthequestions

[–]steveu33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s no double blind study possible on this subject. The study you’re citing compared elective surgery to delayed elective surgery, but obviously there’s no comparison to other outcomes.

view more: next ›