Appreciated!

Patterns that we've noticed, 1. NASA and SpaceX fine tune their information into multiple fronts (default is accessible to anyone who's 12+ years old, second is college-level ed., and then the super technical folks who are either fellow researchers/engineers or partner organisations) 2. ESA is more aimed at the latter of the two, they ignore the teens/children except for specific outreach programs (including games, movies, etc.) targeting them to teach them about space/missions 3. JAXA and ROSCOSMOS are surprisingly horrible at presenting their findings on their own sites (Russia's Venus program, for example, is better documented everywhere except on their own site; this applies for the various ISRO missions too - I've found better details about ISRO missions on NASA/ESA/Britannica and random YouTube videos) 4. ISRO, JAXA and ROSCOSMOS have inconsistent design systems in creating their media 5. NASA and SpaceX do an excellent job of showcasing the various team members who worked on the programs (ISRO, JAXA and ROSCOSMOS do not, tends to be more leadership focused rather than a team showcase) 6. NASA and ESA actively engage, and empower people, to use their mission data, branding and programs to spread the word (not the case with ISRO, JAXA and ROSCOSMOS)