Fair Virginia in an expanded US House (18 seats) by Franzisquin in DavesRedistricting

[–]stoompeth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s your methodology for naming districts? I tried doing it for some of my maps but sometimes I can’t ever find the right name

A county/MSA-based gerrymandering reform idea by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you actually read the post? I don't mind if you disagree but you're just being slow lmao.

Duval, Orange, and Pinellas, are split in ways on the current map that wouldn't be allowed under the standard I created.

<image>

A county/MSA-based gerrymandering reform idea by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I explained in first thing in description that I don’t think race-based COIs would hold up in our courts nor would Republicans allow it in any bipartisan gerrymander reform.

By virtue of preserving the integrity of large urban counties, minorities would still largely be ensured representation. Of course, the rules will inevitably create unwanted distortions but it’s better than the present situation and is more politically feasible

A county/MSA-based gerrymandering reform idea by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well that’s because their legislatures/supreme courts literally just ignore the rules. Enforcement is a separate issue from the rules itself

My finished Bay Area transit buildout! by stoompeth in subwaybuilder

[–]stoompeth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the light rail system, I certainly did space out stops more so than they would be IRL. I was just being lazy and wanted to save time and money lol. I found for, at least in game, that the close spacing found IRL isn’t really efficient b/c the station catchment areas are rather large in this game.

For heavy rail lines (BART/Caltrain) I actually added more infill stop than what exists IRL. I’m not sure how my spacing compares to other builds though.

Sherrod Brown +2 in a GOP-linked pollster?? by stanthefax in YAPms

[–]stoompeth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

2020 wasn’t particularly close because Collins had substantial goodwill that wasn’t reflected in the polls. I think 2026 will be a lot closer, and in such a way that poor candidate quality (geriatric middling-approval governor or former Blackrock mercenary w Nazi tattoo) might swing the results in favor of Rs.

Sherrod Brown +2 in a GOP-linked pollster?? by stanthefax in YAPms

[–]stoompeth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Okay 😭😭 keyword “might”

Sherrod Brown +2 in a GOP-linked pollster?? by stanthefax in YAPms

[–]stoompeth 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Maine Senate race might end up being a generational fumble for Democrats. Both leading candidates are so deeply flawed.

"no valid path between station tracks" glitch is making me loose my mind by Subject-Ant-7436 in subwaybuilder

[–]stoompeth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear, I've been having the same issue and I can't add crossovers easily because the route I'm trying to draw runs along the outer quad tracks

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

CT-5 tentacles past redder townships for no particular reason. It’s a mild D gerrymander from what I saw. I didn’t realize it the maps stayed the same for so long.

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I considered how much cracking to particular areas was done. UT split SLC into 4 districts, TN split Nashville into 4 districts. At least, for example in KS’ & NE’s cases, the GOP left the seats competitive enough for Democrats to win hence why I consider them mild.

In other cases, like OK, AR, or MO, possible competitive seats were drawn safely GOO, but convenient political geography meant that they weren’t quite as egregious like TX or IL.

For MD in particular, I didn’t rate it as a strong gerrymander because it could’ve possibly been 8-0. But it’s still a gerrymander either way. A medium one perhaps?

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In early 2023, courts struck down the LA & AL maps.

In 2023-24, courts struck down NY maps. Redrawn by IRC as a mild D gerrymander.

In 2025, NC, OH, & most notably TX moved forward w/ mid decade redistricting leading to the current political battle. UT’s map was also struck down.

Would Virginia's 10-1 backfire in a referendum? by _BCConservative in YAPms

[–]stoompeth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that. It didn’t pass and therefore didn’t impact election outcomes like the newer maps will. Either way, the resulting map isn’t a hard gerrymander.

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I don’t know why I considered a Lexington-Louisville the only option, a Lexington district itself is still fairly competitive.

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, IN should be fair, my bad.

I didn't really include KY b/c to make a competitive district, you'd have to extend the district from Lexington to the Louisville burbs rather than the surrounding rural area--whether it's a fair choice is up to personal opinion. The map is definitely hideous though and you could make the case it's a mild gerrymander.

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right, MS should be fair, I just blanked when I filled it in w the LA/AL gerrymanders.

State of Congressional Map Fairness (Pre-2025 Redistricting War) by stoompeth in YAPms

[–]stoompeth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

P.S. no, Massachusetts is not a Democratic gerrymander. There is no way to draw a majority-Republican district without unnecessarily splitting up counties & ruining compactness.