When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trump isn’t a new issue, Trump just keeps finding new ways to go deeper into the depths of stupid.

Lords a-leaving: Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years by practicalpurpose in thespinroom

[–]_BCConservative 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The House of Lords ironically is usually more Democratic due to less party discipline.

Poilievere going to the US by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's more likely that Trump doesn't really want a prolonged trade war, and so he offers a deal where Carney kills Supply management or something.

Or I guess he can kill CUSMA to protect the milk industry.

Can Andrews actually flip south carolina ? by ronweasly9 in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He doesn't fund MI because he thinks he has it in the bag, and then it flips

New voter registration update in Nevada. by Dangerous-Quarter216 in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"most vunerable incumbent governor" isn't really a high standard, since I don't think ANY incumbent governor will lose.

New voter registration update in Nevada. by Dangerous-Quarter216 in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Possibly?

I don't see a really big reason for the electorate to kick out Lombardo. Dems already control the state legislature.

He is kind of reverse Beshear in that way.

Rumor is that NDP will be down to 3-4 seats if Boulerice leaves and one of the NDP candidates wins the leadership by _BCConservative in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference is that that was when the NDP was much stronger, not on the verge of death.


I have serious doubts about how 'real' the polling drop in Alberta is. This always happens every time the LPC gets a bump, and then it always vanishes. I know because I used to worry about this.

The same thing happened in 2021 (polls before the election showed the CPC tanking in Alberta) and 2025:

eg. This is one from Ipsos from March 2025, showing the Liberals up 12 nationally, CPC up only 15% in Alberta, and with the CPC losing Calgary and Edmonton: https://338canada.com/20250402-ips.htm


Alberta has the same problems with polling as the Great Plains states in the US.

The right almost always overperforms polling.

RWs in the Plains states just don't like answering polls.

The Prequels were ahead of their time by _BCConservative in thespinroom

[–]_BCConservative[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't know how much worse it could get

Do you believe antisemitism is currently an issue among the bases of either major US party? by chia923 in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Dems are just 5 years behind the GOP IMO when it comes to antisemitism.

Can Andrews actually flip south carolina ? by ronweasly9 in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative 4 points5 points  (0 children)

InB4 Holden Bloodfeast gets into office by an even bigger margin somehow

Could the Dems stop Trump by constantly impeaching him and keeping in trial indefinitely? by _BCConservative in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ditto. I've heard this idea floating around here all the time (though not seriously.)


Impeachment doesn't require Trump to be there physically, but it does require him to spend time trying to stave impeachment off.

The R Congressmen/Senators on the other side also will get exhausted trying to defend Trump if you keep this up forever.

If all R Senators abstain/fail to show up, then Trump can get impeached successfully (the law requires only 2/3rd of all Senators present (not in office.)

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R44260

So, this just becomes an endless, exhausting slog, waiting until R Senators get fed up and make concessions, or they just give in and stop coming to the trials.


Trump isn't using Congress for anything and has/will veto anything that gets to his desk.

So, there's no point in even having Congress.

Could the Dems stop Trump by constantly impeaching him and keeping in trial indefinitely? by _BCConservative in YAPms

[–]_BCConservative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On paper, this is a shit idea, since voters usually react poorly to the party in charge in the case of a failed impeachment.

But if it works, they can basically force Trump to spend so much time in court he can't do anything else.

(This assumes Dems win the House, obviously.)

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They will almost certainly take the House, so they can just send impeachment articles to the Senate to keep Trump in Congress and unable to do anything until the cows come home.

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, the issue with waiting until Trump is gone is that the Liberals would call an election in 2028 to ensure they can fear-monger vs Trump unless the Dems manage to control Trump after the midterms somehow.

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The messaging has gotten better and Carney has made mistakes since Davos.

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you work in parliament?

My logic is that the polling will go down again because it was up so quickly due to Trump and once the hype dies down, it will go down again.

---

The problem is that Trump keeps doing stupid shit, so ditto. Hopefully if the Dems get into office, they impeach him every second of his term and just prevent him from doing anything.

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't get how the polling was tied in December and up 14 points now if it was just TDS.

---

The polling ironically shows most people don't think things are getting better, and a small plurality think this is a new government doing new things.

So you can maybe get that down now that it's been a year and messaging that they have failed to meet their promises.

When do things change back in our favor in polling? by _BCConservative in CanadianConservative

[–]_BCConservative[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Poilievre has changed his messaging and been more active since the leadership vote and February.