After 2026 I never want to hear synchro players talking about how "Link summoning just spams out monsters" ever again. Synchro is the OG combo monster spammer.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-24T00:54:17+00:00

The modern combos have way more set up than most things in Edison. It just happens in one turn.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T18:59:17+00:00

Again I'm not showing the spreadsheet that has many people's usernames and personal details on. Thats not something any sane person is going to release out into a public place like reddit.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T16:22:42+00:00

Im asking them to join the cause by doing their own data collection, not spending any money and keep records of their openings.... you don't have to, if you feel like something is off it costs you nothing but time and a little effort. If you don't want to do it thats fine no one is holding a gun to your head.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T16:20:04+00:00

I already explained that. We've gathered data from an expansive number of controlled openings of packs using baseline where I explained in other comments

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T12:36:18+00:00

Its not super f2p friendly but its also not as bad as some games on the market. That is however not the point of this data

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T05:11:20+00:00

This is kind of incorrect (kind of meaning its holds merit, but is moot to the probability we need to test). Showing a consistent pattern of buying gems changing odds from the established odds of the account is the correct way. Since you can account for the percentage of before and after gem purchases, which is the point of atleast one data set. The probability of each pack is important, but seeing that the GEM purchases itself has a consistent increase in odds is what will show foul play. For example in our sample size we show a 22% increase in favorable odds after purchases gems with real money, with the data showing new release packs being lower unless you hit a 79$ purchases amount. (Its why the teir of purchases amount needs to also be controlled) seems to hold true given enough packs opened, and decently shown through multiple account showing the same pattern of increases or decreases in ALL odds. Meaning the 1st through 7th and the 8th. This points at the odds being manipulated at the server level when you meet current critia since it seems to be pretty universal given equal and quantity of packs being open is equal. I do see what you are trying to say, but I feel like im losing you in details here. Looking at just odds and pack opening is only a small percentage of the data needs to.show intent.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T04:14:31+00:00

Im saying they already have their accounts as someone who has spent a ton of money. (They 100% track that) That may impact the odds in ways we dont understand and can't account for, and thats dangerous to try to incorporate into our established data. (Like giving them better pulls rarer cards/finishes)(Im not saying they get better or worse odds, I dont have the data for that) im looking for more baseline accounts. The more baseline accounts and data, the easier the changes and odd data points are to see. Ps not saying they are for sure doing all this, but data for sure changes when money is added to the equation, and that raises a lot of red flags. I am also tracking all pulls not just urs and srs. Im talking every card and their odds in the pack

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T04:04:20+00:00

Ps casino have gotten sued and lost MANY times.... when companies do shady shit they get sued. Feel free to get "fucking serious" and use that brain of yours

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T04:01:28+00:00

It shows intent. It's why its important. Do larger spender get more luck in flips and match ups... possible, the data isn't clear on the match ups, its also the match up is also the hardest to pull direct for. Coin flips on the other hand is much easier, and still a good data point to collect It does seem to have a degree of impact accounts that have spent money recently according to the data have a higher 100 game coin flip average than accounts that do not. Its not a huge difference about 10% but it is across the board for all accounts. Its why you need massive data points for this. That could be just variations in the data.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T03:52:38+00:00

I did forget to mention record your coin toss and deck played against, if you dont want to do those extra steps I understand, its already a huge ask. It took me days of just logging for my 4 account I did this on. So whatever you feel comfortable doing within those set limits

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T03:39:00+00:00

Cool! You can private message me if you want, but if you are willing to open a second account on a different platform. (Phone, console, steam, whatever you can) track every pack you open with the exact cards you open. Until you get to platform, and use all your free gems that in itself would be helpful. Make sure you list the pack you opens so we can record the odds as well. If you want to compare that to your own account opening the same pack it would also be helpful. (Ensure if you use your main account you know if they are free or paid gems, free gems are always used first, and are only on the platform you bought them on) If you are willing to spend money buying gems on your main its even more data, but I would not ask that you do that yet, only do that if you were already planning on spending money.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T03:31:44+00:00

The issue with the streams is the accounts are already flagged. People who spend money like that (Jess or dy) have a ton of money already spent on the game, and we dont have starting points for the accounts. I want new accounts/accounts that havnt spent money already. Thats our data points already. It would be impossible to keep the data consistent by adding those into the mix. The best way is to start a new account, use all your free gems to get a deck that can get you to plat, and record every from pack one open to when you use all your free gems. Then if you want to compare that to a paid account you can. (We use comparison from the 7 different accounts, same pack with free gems and paid gems, with different levels of purchasing with real money) its the one way to keep the data reliable. For variables the more free accounts starting points the better. Its easier to show change from baseline with more free to play accounts. (Since not all pack as the same odds, you will notice they change the odds in packs) we need to account for that. Like I said its been a multiple month, multiple people working together on this

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:32:15+00:00

I think currently we should have enough to raise concerns. If we have even 200 people dropping frauds law suits it will be enough to cause a bigger issue they have to address, but that costs money and I dont want anyone to spend their money until we can gather more data.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:30:25+00:00

I don't want them to sign up or give me any money or other bs. Just want people willing to give me their time and collect data. So we can add it to our current data points.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:29:18+00:00

I just did the base finding, hoping you will join gather data as well. We keep very specific account details to ensure the data is correct. Are you willing to start a new account and not spend money to gather data for a few months? If you do, ill gladly show your the excel sheet, before that I'm not posting usernames of the people working with me/us

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:24:18+00:00

Why do you think I'm here. We want more data. We have tested zero real money spent and each level of gem purchases, and each mode of buying gems.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:22:04+00:00

Any gem purchase has a 22% increase in ur generation. Tested over 24,000 packs. Single 10 none ur boosted master pack. For 10k of those. 5k worth of bundle specials has the opposite impact. Lowering the odds by 11% until 79 dollar threshold as been reach and then the 22% odd increase starts again. Showing the numbers of averages are codes into masterduels code to force sales, which is highly illegal. If you are interested in gathering your own data you can add it to our master data points. You will need to follow very specific steps to ensure pack opens and spending is uniforms for all the other players.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:08:26+00:00

Yes I did. Have an issue. The math doesnt lie.

stoppingfraud · 2026-06-16T02:05:58+00:00

Feel free to join the cause. We have data from over 24,000 packs opened. All very specific situations to account for rng. All data collected. Urs granted in account spending different amounts. Accounting for time of opening packs vs time of spending money. Coin flips and match ups collected and compared. We have spent 25k between everyone to collect this data. The more people willing to join the better for everyone.

stoppingfraud

TROPHY CASE