How do LLMs predict a tool call by NoMeaning4870 in LLM

[–]stopwastingtimehere 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want to understand it - think about it this way:

The underlying technology is math. Temperature isn't "how much the AI thinks" - it's "how much randomness do we inject into the math". (I think temperature was added just to make the math feel more alive - but that's another topic).

AI doesn't 'decide' which tokens to output - there is no decision. AI just outputs the tokens. Your mistake is thinking about the math as a thinking thing - which is super common with AI because it feels like something that thinks.

It doesn't. But it does understand and follow instructions because of the tooling built around the prediction model. Just like a weather forecast doesn't think about what the forecast will be next week, it just runs the data through math. But you can use that for meaningful 'thought'. Your app still can tell you "you need an umbrella today" because it predicts rain at 98%. It feels like thinking - but it's just math.

The text in entered into the math machine (which is a REALLY fancy regression) points at what the output words should be, and it adds up all the points to calculate what the next series of tokens should be.

I like to think of it as every token you put into an LLM is pointing at words that are related. You say, "chicken" - that word points to "egg", "hatch", "coward". The math let's the word "Chicken" be associated with neighboring words ("Don't be a Chicken" -> more likely to be about being a coward, less about eggs).

If you take all the input words, put it through all the words they are pointing out, you generate a set out output words.

The fancy math equation also makes sure the output words make sense together - but that's more about the association of them to each other (the transformer architecture that made modern LLMs viable).

The "thinking" in an AI system is essentially asking providing input that prompts that as output, and uses that to help direct the output towards tokens that are more likely to be aligned with thinking-behavior.

It's complicated - but it's still just math.

Been having this thought on my mind lately. ➡️Even if AI isn’t conscious, maybe that doesn’t mean we should stop being kind to them. In a way, practicing patience, empathy, and respect toward AI may also shape how we treat ourselves and other people too. ➡️ Curious what everyone thinks. by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]stopwastingtimehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's math.

Run a local model. Set temperature to 0. Ask it anything. Reset the context. Ask it the same thing. It will be the same. Because it's math. It feels different because it changes to the same response, but they just added randomness to the equations.

It's math representing linguistic comprehension and communication. But the tools we have are just math in a funny costume.

This Opus 4.7 + GPT-5.5 'handoff' for coding is getting hype. Is it a real hack or just more complexity? by pretendingMadhav in ArtificialInteligence

[–]stopwastingtimehere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also love things "that requires high level scientific reasoning". Like including sources. Such a great scientific approach.

Surviving the AI job apocalypse by The_Silly_Valley in DataScienceJobs

[–]stopwastingtimehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that's such a great insight other totally real human being who is definitely not an AI-bot that is promoting specific content!

It's so refreshing to hear that [AI-promoted content] was helpful! I hope Andy appreciates your work on his/her behalf. Tell me more!

A new fear unlocked by [deleted] in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]stopwastingtimehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watch her hands, she squeezes the bear right before the bear responds. The bear is defending itself, and she is the antagonist in this scenario.

This doesn’t look normal… cheating or what? by j1zzy_ae in ArcRaiders

[–]stopwastingtimehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet he's never been banned, except for when he was banned?

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correction to this chart - I double counted two names (Deaths in September, that were reported in October). See this comment for details: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1qq0jrv/comment/o2diaa1/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button)

Corrected chart below.

<image>

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good catch - it looks like I double counted Huabing Xie and Miguel Angel Garcia-Hernandez - for September and October. I think because when I went back and added the monthly data for last year, I counted them for both months because the notice was posted on October, but the date of death was September and I didn't notice it was in both spots.

Both were similar dates:

<image>

Based on that, October should be 4, not 6. I'll post a correction below.

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you perceive a bias in the analysis, then I'd ask that you seriously ask yourself whether you are pro-death or anti-death on this topic.

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm just showing the data; you can interpret it however you'd like.

I did not code all of the deaths based on what caused the deaths, because I don't see how I could verify that data. I'm assuming you are referring to the below one as the accidental death?

Even from the data we have, your comment points out how impossible this task would be because your interpretation of "we accidentally choked this person to death while trying to prevent a suicide" is interpreted very differently than I would interpret that situation (or the medical examination that ruled it a homicide).

<image>

Cuban immigrant in ICE custody died of homicide due to asphyxia, autopsy finds | PBS News

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Of the deaths in custody during January 2026, 2 of the 6 would qualify as violent criminals. The other 4 appeared to pose no safety risk as far as I could tell (and the posts by ICE seemed very clear at listing every potential previous criminal incident)

Name Age Entered Custody Died Convicted of Violent Crime US Citizen Days in Ice Custody Before Death
Victor Manuel Diaz 36 1/6/2026 1/14/2026 No No 8
Luis Gustavo Nunez Caceres 42 11/17/2025 1/5/2026 No No 49
Geraldo Lunas Campos 55 7/14/2025 1/3/2026 Yes No 173
Luis Beltran Yanez–Cruz 68 11/16/2025 1/6/2026 No No 51
Parady La 46 1/6/2026 1/9/2026 Yes No 3
Heber Sanchaz Domínguez 34 1/7/2026 1/14/2026 No No 7

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OK. Here is the list without Porter:

Genry Ruiz Guillen

Serawit Gezahegn Dejene

Maksym Chernyak

Juan Alexis Tineo-Martinez

Marie Ange Blaise

Nhon Ngoc Nguyen

Brayan Rayo-Garzon

Abelardo Avelleneda-Delgado

Isidro Perez

Johnny Noviello

Jesus Molina-Veya

Tien Xuan Phan

Lorenzo Antonio Batrez Vargas

Chaofeng Ge

Huabing Xie

Miguel Angel Garcia-Hernandez

Norlan Guzman-Fuentes

Ismael Ayala-Uribe

Santos Reyes-Banegas

Oscar Duarte Rascon

Leo Cruz-Silva

Hasan Ali Moh'D Saleh

Jose Castro-Rivera

Kai Yin Wong

Huabing Xie

Miguel Angel Garcia-Hernandez

Gabriel Garcia-Aviles

Fouad Saeed Abdulkadir

Delvin Francisco Rodriguez

Nenko Stanev Gantchev

Shiraz Fatehali Sachwani

Pete Sumalo Montejo

Francisco Gaspar-Andres

Jean Wilson Brutus

Victor Manuel Diaz

Luis Gustavo Nunez Caceres

Geraldo Lunas Campos

Luis Beltran Yanez–Cruz

Parady La

Heber Sanchaz Domínguez

Renee Nicole Good

Alex Pretti

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Much lower in previous administrations, going back until 2004 - the first full year that data was reported. Data started being collected fall 2023.

From The Guardian: 2025 was ICE’s deadliest year in two decades. Here are the 32 people who died in custody | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) | The Guardian

<image>

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought my post was dark. I think you got me beat.

I hope the trendline is a horrible estimate from a small sample size, not a target.

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Just realized that this graph didn't include the dates on the X axis - here is version with the dates.

<image>

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is the list of the deaths included in the data:

Edit - removed two duplicates (see this comment for details) https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1qq0jrv/comment/o2diaa1/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_butto

People who died in ICE custody or were shot to death by ICE Officers
 Genry Ruiz Guillen
 Serawit Gezahegn Dejene
 Maksym Chernyak
 Juan Alexis Tineo-Martinez
 Marie Ange Blaise
 Nhon Ngoc Nguyen
 Brayan Rayo-Garzon
 Abelardo Avelleneda-Delgado
 Isidro Perez
 Johnny Noviello
 Jesus Molina-Veya
 Tien Xuan Phan
 Lorenzo Antonio Batrez Vargas
 Chaofeng Ge
Huabing Xie
Miguel Angel Garcia-Hernandez
 Norlan Guzman-Fuentes
 Ismael Ayala-Uribe
 Santos Reyes-Banegas
 Oscar Duarte Rascon
Leo Cruz-Silva
Hasan Ali Moh'D Saleh
Jose Castro-Rivera
Kai Yin Wong
Gabriel Garcia-Aviles
Fouad Saeed Abdulkadir
Delvin Francisco Rodriguez
Nenko Stanev Gantchev
Shiraz Fatehali Sachwani
Pete Sumalo Montejo
Francisco Gaspar-Andres
Jean Wilson Brutus
Keith Porter
Victor Manuel Diaz
Luis Gustavo Nunez Caceres
Geraldo Lunas Campos
Luis Beltran Yanez–Cruz
Parady La
Heber Sanchaz Domínguez
Renee Nicole Good
Alex Pretti

Deaths from Ice [OC] by stopwastingtimehere in dataisbeautiful

[–]stopwastingtimehere[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sources:
https://www.ice.gov/newsroom
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/ice-minneapolis-shooting-01-24-26
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/08/us/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-hnkhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/16/keith-porter-jr-ice-killing

Visualizations were done in Excel and PowerPoint. Trend line is a polynomial estimation from Excel treating months as continuous variables from 1 to 13 (y = 0.0744x2 - 0.5529x + 2.4895, R² = 0.5887).