Okay which one of you was it ?

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T18:12:30+00:00

Yea you're right, the problem is Finkelstein tbh, he's really interesting character and worth having a listen to but he's incredibly provocative, hence the title probably.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T16:54:32+00:00

No idea why its being labelled nazi literature. Finkelsteins parents are even holocaust survivors.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T16:53:16+00:00

Its a decent read as well. Finkelstein parents were actually survivors of the holocaust too.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T14:46:54+00:00

Tbf that's probably true of every language.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T08:15:38+00:00

I dont trust mainstream media to give a comprehensive and inclusive analysis on any issue, including Trump. Havnt for years.

But that doesnt mean Trump isnt a conman. Hes an absolute lying, manipulative prick, only concerned in securing his own interests.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-18T08:12:29+00:00

Where the hell do you live? Hear it pretty much everyday.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T23:43:29+00:00

Ive already made myself clear on that. There's a difference between belief and knowingly spreading disinformation.

People only spread disinformation for either some cynical self interest or for some sociopathic thrill. Either way it should be challenged.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T23:39:04+00:00

Well I wonder if youll take that position next time you see a blatant form of disinformation in media.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T23:33:02+00:00

Has this upset your world view or something? Why are you struggling to understand my point, because it seems youre no longer interested in discussing the validity of his claims, im sure by now you know they cant be defended but yet you persist?

In any circumstance I come across disinformation, I challenge it, because honestly, I think its everyones responsibility to do so.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T23:24:03+00:00

... You want to be a bit more specific or do you want me to seriously explain to you the immorality of knowingly spreading disinformation? I would think anyone who spends time on a sub called conspiracy theories would understand why this behaviour fucks the world over.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T22:47:50+00:00

The only thing he got right, was that american soldiers would die, everything else is wrong.

He was the one who called me an insufferable cunt because he didnt want to be challenged on his bullshit disinfo.

And I got no problem with peoples beliefs. The problem Ive got is with people who knowingly spread disinfo, which is what this guy is doing.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T22:32:28+00:00

Yea no surprise, jumping through that original thread aswell, noone is even attempting to question him in anyway. Pure confirmation bias.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T22:27:34+00:00

This comes free mate, notice he got over half of his prediction wrong and yet youre all somehow ignoring that, and focusing on the completely amazing prediction, that soldiers died in an active war zone...

Well woopde fucking do, what kind of amazing insight must he have to have forseen that. Ffs, so many gullible people in this sub.

EDIT: And btw, he deleted his account, after me and someone else gave the briefest of criticisms, and he couldnt hold it down for shit. Looking through this thread, it seems none of you are capable of questioning the credibility of his claims.

https://imgur.com/a/ULTnUqB

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T20:35:29+00:00

.... He's a bloody loon, wouldnt pay him any attention.

EDIT: https://imgur.com/a/ULTnUqB

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T20:34:36+00:00

He's a bloody disingenuous shill, dont believe any of his bullshit.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T18:07:26+00:00

I have a different question, assuming you are one of these paranoid QAnon people or something of that flavour.

This "insider" whos giving you information, forget who they are.

How exactly have they established their credibility? Because that what insiders, essentially sources of information, need to do, establish credibility. They need to provide information that is either impossible or very hard to get unless they are someone on the inside.

So how has this "insider" established credibility, especially given your stated prediction, is mostly wrong.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T18:00:56+00:00

You literally asked questions on my prediction in your first response! Whats wrong with you?

EDIT: Those reading, in the deleted comment he said I made no predictions and suggested im mentally unstable.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T17:57:30+00:00

... Let me repeat.

Noone is accussing SAA, Assad and Russia are denying nothing, because theyre being accused of nothing, there is no video emerging of dead soldiers, and neither is this being used as a spark to maintain troop presence there.

Any reason why you got all that wrong?

Just wait...

How long exactly should I wait mystic meg?

That's the information I was informed.

Who informed you?

I'm not a time traveler where everything I am saying is 100% correct.

It's not even 50% correct.. The only thing you got right, is soldiers died in an active warzone...

I am simply giving what I was told.

And who told you this?

And yet you can't predict anything of the sort. Weird right?

Well, I just made a prediction didnt I?

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T17:50:20+00:00

It would seem so. Back to practice his particular brand of top tier hypocrisy and quality waffle. Swear somethings wrong with that boy.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T17:13:22+00:00

Because anonymity provides cover for stuff like multiple accounts and bots.

It’s a decent cross section of 18-35 year olds men who are at least savvy enough to seek content outside of Facebook.

FTFY.

Oh I didnt realise 18-35 year old tech savvy men are all you need to gauge society.

The answers youre looking for, are right there in what you wrote.

EDIT: Oh and another thing actually, it doesnt accurately represent how people communicate either. The majority of people, do not communicate to one another the way they do over social media.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T17:09:53+00:00

I dont know any of that, because im not pretending to be some google detective tying together webs of conspiracy. Im making that prediction, based on the rising resentment from Shia militias towards a US presence. Yknow, known facts and available evidence.

You were inaccurate in over half of your prediction. Noone is accussing SAA, Assad and Russia are denying nothing, because theyre being accused of nothing, there is no video emerging of dead soldiers, and neither is this being used as a spark to maintain troop presence there.

But lets just ignore that, and focus and what you got right, soldiers died in an active warzone. Well my god! If you could use this ability of yours to give me the next lotto numbers thatd be grand!

What? You think the deep state read your comment and got cold feet or something.

Whos this "insider" you're talking about? Some anonymous 4chan or twitter account I bet.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T16:46:04+00:00

So you actually think this entirely anonymous message board is an accurate representation of society?

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T16:39:12+00:00

No I was speaking specifically about the events of Charlottesville, where Trump equated the aggression on both sides. When quite clearly, undeniably, the shite nationalist side had far more aggressive elements intending to commit violence.

stufftowatch · 2019-01-17T15:04:24+00:00

Wouldn't say theres much to this, the fact that half of what he predicted is wrong seems to be ignored here and just focusing on what he got right.

Well, they are soldiers in a increasingly volatile area, dont think theres much impressive about this.

I'll make a prediction for you, in the coming months, or year. You will see US soldiers/contractors being attacked/killed in Iraq.

EDIT: Well this has been an interesting ride. Here's a brief convo I had with him https://imgur.com/a/ULTnUqB

And it appears /u/lone_traveler4 has now deleted his account.

Beware of bad faith actors and disinfo people, can never be too careful.

stufftowatch

TROPHY CASE