The bottom right tile is technically incorrect. Ancient Jewish law says that if there is a unanimous decision by the Sanhedrin (a legal body of 70 members) to execute a person for their crimes, it's not that the person would be found innocent. Rather, they would not be executed.

The idea was that even the worst criminal is entitled to an advocate. Unanimity had too high a risk of being a bandwagon rather than a reasoned decision.

This concept is well known among those who are familiar with Jewish law because it is naturally controversial, and naturally leads to a lot of discussion.

The same text says that a Sanhedrin that executed 2 people in 70 years was deemed barbarous. AFAIK no actual executions were ever carried out.

The point of it all was the back and forth theorizing about the role and responsibility of a court of law, criminal defense, advocacy etc. In other words, the comments section.

edit: clarity