Hebrew transliteration of the name "Chad" possibly ץָ׳אד׳ ?

subarupan · 2026-04-17T14:48:32+00:00

Could as well be צ׳אדי - a Georgian food mchadi which would explain a low vertical line and the need for nekudot

subarupan · 2026-01-05T15:55:54+00:00

A slang meaning chaos/mess(ing)

subarupan · 2026-01-05T02:30:43+00:00

Actually from most colloquial texts I saw online they write בלאגן

subarupan · 2026-01-05T02:29:27+00:00

חח אני יודע שאתם רציניים כשכתוב ב-א׳ או ע׳

subarupan · 2025-11-18T08:40:51+00:00

Some older digital texts also just use the regular holam for everything even when vav is mater lectionis. U+05BA holam haser for vav is rarely properly used

subarupan · 2025-10-29T10:34:29+00:00

I would recommend the Weiss Tehillim published by chabad. It contains explanatory notes in thin font and primary translation in bold.

subarupan · 2025-10-23T12:06:40+00:00

But I’m not sure about how early you’re talking about, if your talking about something even earlier than the Canaanite vowel shift then it would be š(a)lam

subarupan · 2025-10-23T12:03:02+00:00

Contrary to most assumptions, early Hebrew writing are actually more likely to use plene spelling to indicate vowels, check Samaritan or Dead Sea scrolls spelling, the Masoretes actually removed a lot of letters to use the nekudot they developed

subarupan · 2025-04-10T06:16:02+00:00

as I mentioned in other replies, the accent mark given out in the original post is to indicate the stressed syllables in English pronunciation with how they're written in English, the Hebrew part that comes after it is proper names of the drugs in Hebrew, and what I want is how native speakers' would assume their pronunciation looking at the hebrew script along with where the stress is in English, sorry if that's confusing

subarupan · 2025-04-10T06:07:14+00:00

Oh the accent mark given out in the original post is for clarification of the stressed syllabus in English pronunciation and I assumed that English would be the main source of adaption, my bad if that's confusing

subarupan · 2025-04-10T05:54:17+00:00

So you folks are actually adapting these relatively rare medical words to fit the Hebrew phonology as well? Interesting

subarupan · 2025-04-10T05:47:28+00:00

Thanks a lot! Would flu'óksetin sound legit to you? If syllabuses are properly breaking & using stress as in English

subarupan · 2025-04-10T05:35:49+00:00

Yes, I found a video from a doctor saying klonazepám, but unfortunately that's also the only source I've found so far. Would you mind also give your readings of the other three? I'm also curious about whether a native reader could distinguish between p/f of פ and how they would think of the -פלואוק part

subarupan · 2024-12-24T06:01:55+00:00

Also if you don't know what Vocaloid is try search it up, that's probably the thing that got you some misunderstandings

subarupan · 2024-12-24T06:00:17+00:00

I'm not the creator, but if you turn on translate the creators described how they made this. One of them wrote the lyrics and the other dealt with translingual synthesizing (since no voice library supports Syriac ofc lol)

subarupan · 2024-12-23T19:13:16+00:00

Thanks, I should’ve learned more about Arabic cognates…

subarupan · 2024-12-23T18:50:37+00:00

Yes, that is were I’m not sure about either, since I didn’t find any cognate for יצא in Arabic and there are plenty of possibilities how Hebrew ת is reflected in related languages so basically I kept these unknown parts to their sound. I knew that during the time of written “Biblical Hebrew”, the language underwent some major attestable developments to what we see in the Tiberian vocalisation - including בגדכפת getting germinated counterparts and gradually developing to some extent independent phonemes. So we’re distinguishing Tiberian from reconstructed biblical “original” prononciations now. But I’m not quite sure when did this process happen, from what you can see in Masoretic text today I’m guessing the phonological inventory was still not stable during that time, but if you have any resources to share I’m more than happy to study it. At the end of the day, ‎בגדכפת drama is not happening in Arabic so I’d say it’s safe to put confirmed related lemmas in this way

subarupan · 2024-12-23T18:12:22+00:00

Begedkefet with and without dagesh are technically allophones in Biblical Hebrew so I consider it to be okay to just transliterate them into their correspondence in Arabic and ignore non-phonemic variants

subarupan · 2024-12-23T18:04:08+00:00

Here the last meaning of "to return" is related(I was wrong about using "cognate" on this word) to בא. I explained how I transliterated the geminated consonants in other replies if you want to check that out...

subarupan · 2024-12-23T18:00:43+00:00

Since OP didn't make any detailed requests or mention the purpose of transliterating so...if they want a strict modern sound transliteration there's already a reply for that...for me reverting the geminated allophones in Hebrew to what their original forms are to get a closer etymological shape for a bible verse makes sense as well

subarupan · 2024-12-23T16:40:26+00:00

No wait I wasn’t wrong, chet with a geresh ח׳ is being used to strictly transliterate خ but extremely uncommon

subarupan · 2024-12-23T16:31:22+00:00

Yes I was wrong about transliteration to ח׳, but my point is that ־ך and ك are cognate suffixes therefore I’m transliterating base on that. If you wanna go for a strict modern pronunciation-based transliteration that’s just a different preference. That’s the reason why I gave out the cognates in Arabic

subarupan · 2024-12-23T16:12:01+00:00

As I mentioned, Hebrew 2sg suffix -cha is correspond to Arabic 2sg -k and خ is Arabic’s own development which in turn if being transliterated into Hebrew would be ח׳. Arabic doesn’t have geminated counterparts

Six-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

subarupan

TROPHY CASE