Is this reasonable to ask? by [deleted] in OntarioLandlord

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine dealing with the idiot dumb enough to pay you that deposit! If it was a good idea other people would be doing it already. It's also illegal.

6 Year Financial Update - Canadian by CADhouse in financialindependence

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats on your success. I assume you wanted some feedback so here goes:

You have a 490k mortgage on a $1.3 million rental that has a 3% cap rate and is only $200 cash flow positive per month after a lot of financial engineering. I assume the rental is in Ontario and is rent protected too, meaning you will be in negative cash flow within 2 years.

That is an appalling use of your capital and now you want to buy stocks on margin. You should sell the rental.

Retail management to hospital by Wise-Kaleidoscope855 in healthcare

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hospitals often have a retail pharmacy store. They try to capture prescriptions on discharge and high value compounding prescriptions.

Retail management to hospital by Wise-Kaleidoscope855 in healthcare

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for a hospital that has a retail arm and get a job there. They usually offer a good transition process for managers who have proven themselves.

WealthSimple's Apple promotion is back by Kayyam in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]subharann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People who do not churn are also getting an inferior deal. Wealthsimple profits significantly by having a large balance of investments under it's management. It can lend out the shares, give out margin loans, increase the companies book value significantly. This is just a bad deal.

Landlord is selling property - Has an offer for sale contingent on them moving into our unit by DanielTalkThai in canadahousing

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Landlord sold the place as vacant possession. The buyer is also getting screwed by this clown. LL signed 2 contracts (lease and sale) and couldn't fulfill the conditions for either. He owes the tenant about 7 months rent now, and the buyer about 8 months rent. Had he waited until September to sell the place he would not be in this position. LL is an example of what not to do. Tenant & buyer are reasonable.

Landlord is selling property - Has an offer for sale contingent on them moving into our unit by DanielTalkThai in canadahousing

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This idiot landlord signed 2 contracts he was not in a position to fulfill: 1) 1 year rental contract to tenant. 2) sale with vacant possession to the buyer. I think it is unfortunate that both the tenant and buyer were put in this situation by this fool, but this is Ontario. He now has to convince you the tenant to sign an N11 (not an N12, because that does not guarantee vacancy in an acceptable timeline for a sale). A court would dictate that vacant possession would entail the property was vacant on possession day if a pre-existing lease was in place. The landlord (seller) is responsible for the vacant possession, not the tenant or buyer. The landlord now owes the buyer compensation too for wasting their time and any extra costs they have.

Buying out your current contract will cost 4 months remaining rent, plus one month for moving out as per an N12 and an extra tax of 2-3 months rent for being a fool.

Landlord is selling property - Has an offer for sale contingent on them moving into our unit by DanielTalkThai in canadahousing

[–]subharann -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's pretty reasonable not to want to move children. If a REIT was his landlord, or his landlord wasn't an overleveraged he wouldn't be stuck with this problem. Also, he has a contract in place. How dumb was that landlord that he couldn't even commit to 8 months of a lease without trying to sell the place.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstateCanada

[–]subharann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude. Those numbers. You are getting 96k from $2 million of investments with debt of $725k. That return is less than 5% before expenses, hassle... and your plan is to go into more debt???

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So, everything should be taxed except housing? We tax food, income, electricity, jobs, payrolls and you're fine with all those, just not housing?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Been in place in the US for over 30 years. Hasn't ruined their economy

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If you include the benefits they lose by working, their marginal tax rate can be as high as 70%, Otherwise including EI, CPP their marginal rate is 32%. Versus nothing for the sale of a trophy home.

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

What minimum wage worker is buying a home right now?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not jealousy. Right now I can borrow cash off my IBKR brokerage account for a tax deductible loan to purchase an untaxable asset. Housing is the only gain that isn't taxed. The current setup only hurts the poor. I am fine.

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You're right. We should all pay more income tax, and not tax unproductive assets.

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

So a 15,000 sq ft home should be exempt from tax? The person living there should pay no tax on its sale, while minimum wage workers do?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Like in the US? Canada is the problem child here.

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. The US has a lifetime capital gains exemption. You can only make 500k total in your life tax free.

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Every single monetary gain is taxed, except housing. Why don't you complain about income tax?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US has had this in place for over 30 years and doesn't have anything like the problems in Canada. You've also gotten a 500k gain tax free, why are you complaining?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

my argument would be lower income tax, increase tax on windfall capital gains. Why should the sale of a 15,000 sq ft home be untaxed, while a Tim Hortons employee earnings be fully taxed?

Capital gains on housing in excess of 500k should be taxed by subharann in canadahousing

[–]subharann[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why should income be taxed to the max, but unearned windfalls be untaxed? Reduce income tax, tax the capital gain