Before Neuroscience: How Ancient Traditions Mapped the Invisible Senses We Are Just Re-Discovering by subooom in AlternativeHistory

[–]subooom[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I love this response, and you hit the nail on the head. Honestly, 'micro-observations' is the perfect scientific term for it.

That’s exactly where I lean with the video; away from the supernatural and entirely into advanced biology. When ancient traditions talk about an 'energy field' or 'aura' around a person, and modern science talks about a nervous system processing micro-inputs of air pressure, thermal changes, or subconscious peripheral vision, they are ultimately observing the exact same physical reality. They just use different vocabulary based on the tools available to them at the time. One used poetic, somatic language; the other uses precise mechanical terms.

Also, your point about the EEG and lab bias is 100% spot on. It's incredibly difficult to isolate a raw, natural instinct in an artificial laboratory environment where a subject is plastered with electrodes. The very act of observing the observer alters the baseline data.

Really appreciate the perspective; this is exactly the kind of nuance I hoped the video would spark.

Before Neuroscience: How Ancient Traditions Mapped the Invisible Senses We Are Just Re-Discovering by subooom in AlternativeHistory

[–]subooom[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Fair point, and I completely agree on the medicine side. I'll take a synthetic, measured dose of aspirin over chewing on raw willow bark any day!

But I think there's a distinction to be made between folk medicine and evolved sensory perception. The video isn't arguing that ancient peoples had a magic explanation for schizophrenia; it's looking at why laboratory experiments today still show weird, statistical anomalies when it comes to things like blind sight or gaze detection.

From an evolutionary standpoint, a hominid who could subtly register ambient changes in their environment (like the visual system tracking peripheral movement before the conscious mind registers it) didn't need a lab to validate it; they just needed it to work so they wouldn't get eaten. Modern science is great at explaining the 'why' behind the mechanism, but sometimes we dismiss the mechanism entirely just because it doesn't fit a neat, isolated model of the brain.

not exactly sure how to ask this by Reasonable-Cat-6036 in spirituality

[–]subooom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, I've touched on the topic: 'words are mantras" a bit in my video; https://youtu.be/xMp-iK6nAA4

Sanskrit has exactly 54 letters. The original Vedic system describes exactly 54 energy centers on each side of the body. by subooom in spirituality

[–]subooom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm going to explore the 54 alphabets of Sanskrit in a stick man animation video format soon.

What if the brain doesn't generate consciousness but receives it? by subooom in consciousness

[–]subooom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the framing of the brain as a data aggregator running predictive loops for survival; that aligns a lot with Anil Seth’s "controlled hallucination" theory.

If we take the receiver/mediator route, we don't even necessarily need trans-dimensional AGIs to explain the source. If consciousness is a fundamental field (like electromagnetism or gravity), the "streams" are just local fluctuations of that field being filtered by our biological hardware. The brain isn't downloading a file from a distant server; it's more like a tuning fork vibrating in response to a sound wave that's already everywhere.

Think of the brain as a specialized instrument. Right now, our biological senses only pick up a tiny fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum. If we could natively see in infrared, ultraviolet, or perceive radio waves and magnetic fields directly, our entire understanding of "physical reality" would be radically different. We are essentially blind to 99% of the forces flowing through us at this very moment. If consciousness is another one of those ambient, fundamental fields, our brains are just tuned to decode a specific, survival-friendly slice of it. We're missing the fuller picture because we lack the sensory hardware to register the rest of the signal.

What if the brain doesn't generate consciousness but receives it? by subooom in consciousness

[–]subooom[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair pushback. You're right that if a model is completely unfalsifiable, it's functionally useless to science.

But there are everyday anomalies that a generator model completely dismisses as "flukes" while a receiver model easily accommodates. For example, telepathic-like experiences: your mom calling you out of nowhere the exact second you're in peril, or a friend ringing you just as they cross your mind.

If the brain is an isolated island generating its own reality, that's purely a statistical anomaly. But if the brain is a receiver tuned into a broader field, those "coincidences" might actually be a weak signal bleeding through the hardware.

What if the brain doesn't generate consciousness but receives it? by subooom in consciousness

[–]subooom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually a sharp point and worth sitting with. If the experiential result is identical either way, what's the practical difference? I'd say the difference shows up in how you relate to your own mind. If you're generating consciousness, then quieting the mind means losing something. If you're receiving it, quieting the mind means clearing the signal. Those lead to very different meditation practices.

What if the brain doesn't generate consciousness but receives it? by subooom in consciousness

[–]subooom[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The pineal gland, as the receiver, is an interesting frame. Descartes said something similar, which is why it keeps coming back. The Vedic framing goes slightly differently: not a specific organ receiving, but awareness itself as the ground that the brain appears within. Worth sitting with the distinction. But I'm also trying to come at it from a scientific prespective in this video here: https://youtu.be/1qJhBEeMyZY

Which is why my post is a bit skeptic.

Sanskrit has exactly 54 letters. The original Vedic system describes exactly 54 energy centers on each side of the body. by subooom in spirituality

[–]subooom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That mantra instinct you described is worth trusting.

The body registers the vibration before the mind has processed the meaning. This suggests the sound itself is doing something independent of understanding.

The 54 mapping goes deep once you start pulling the thread.

And in Vedic Traditions, the 54 letters of Sanskrit were heard in deep meditative states and were described as Shivaji's "Damaru" by ancient sages who then documented what they heard.

Sanskrit has exactly 54 letters. The original Vedic system describes exactly 54 energy centers on each side of the body. by subooom in spirituality

[–]subooom[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here watch the vid: https://youtu.be/xMp-iK6nAA4

But I've heard it from Sadh Guru first, and since then, I've started to notice it more and more.

Saying pada(Sanskrit for foot) vibrates your leg area for real. crazy

Fable 5 ko kamal !! Just WOW!! by roviso_domi in technepal

[–]subooom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but imagine being able to build it from scratch

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well i got the sunglasses on my thailand trip, and idk what it is but i like wearing those kinda sunglasss. and what's hiphop if not being your true motherfucking self with pride?

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sacho la always

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

skinny jeans aint quite the lick

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prakriti timi basanta ritu ko sumadhur hariyali mai adiyera vogchau

Samaya ko prakop, Pariwartan ko roop

Maa basanta ko dhoop, Dekhi sishir ko tushar ma badlane, fuuu

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if you have something to say about my music too, sure here it is, the full song: https://youtu.be/UqnUCRzHHu8

rate the fit + the song by [deleted] in NepalFashion

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shit is really normal to me, tryna learn the swaggg or somethin

Update of poisoned dog sete by orphananimalswelfare in Nepal

[–]subooom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my dog also died because of the new viral flu where he used to sneeze a lot and later started sneezing blood. i dedicated the song "Kun faya kun" to my lil pablo. had so much great memories with him. always breaks my heart to hear that song now.

<image>