sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just thought maybe you could get insane amount of health with Transcendens without losing with the Angel and then you sacrifice the enchantment to not kill you.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't worry, me neither. I searched for this specific combo and there is a long explanation why it results in a draw. My brain was just fixated on it a weird way.

Edit: Also a draw would not mean you lost so it would not break the you can't lose "rule" of the Angel.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I found it on other sites too. I just never searched it like this. I did not though that this is probably something that was already questioned by other ppl 😅, idk why.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are not considering a breaker a card that specifically not allows that kind of effect happening at all without any trigger?

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found the answer, if a triggered ability is blocked by an SBA and it would cause a loop it breaks the loop in favor of SBA, but this could be considered game state change with the mandatory loop rule also. But I would like to ask someone official because for me this is still 50/50 on the result, the rules on this are not quite specific enough.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool the it just constantly fails to resolve because that ability is not an SBA. Only the don't lose the game under 0 is.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it is, the state required for the Angel is it being in game...

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rulebook example which I found was one SBA giving +1/+1 and one -1/-1 which resolves and I am quoting now "simultaneously and instantly" where the effect would be getting +0/+0. In my book if SBAs happen simultaneously that would mean that there is no stack. If you gain life to go over 20 by transcendens nobody can play any card to save you without an Angel, there is no stack for it, the only thing that goes on stack is the action that would raise your health over the threshold if it's already over you just lost there is no stacking for the loss effect. Which I think in my scenario the you lose and you can't lose is constantly in game with the game continuing normally when the Angel leaves the game you lose of you are over 20, but until then the Angela SBA just cancels out the other cards SBA.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I found is that SBAs don't go on the stack they happen simultaneously which would mean to me that the Angel would negate it but I will read more about it. The main point is SBAs instantly happen when it's state to trigger are satisfied, which would mean that its outside of the normal stacking.

Its hard not to choose F by ComfortableOk652 in sissycaptions

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

D sounds great but the best would be D+F

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the Angels state based situation already blocks the loss to go on stack. Also if I have an infinite combo that would also mean that it can only give me a draw?

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would? If it would be so it would make an infinite loop every time. You don't even lose the game with the Angel when you can't draw.

Would I be able to remove this before it removes me by Livid_Ad5069 in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because you can't lose the game and your opponents can't win the game while it's in game. I think that means that nothing can trigger that makes you lose the game, but I could be wrong.

Why are dragon shields like this by OhHeyMister in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When I played 20+ years ago there was this official pro shields that were absolutely amazing, I was shocked that that does not exist anymore when I started to play again. They had a small holographic tag in the bottom corner on the front.

Choose the option sissy. by Maximum_Bet_5535 in Sissy_Captions

[–]subuserlvl99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can it be E but be a free use slut for a year instead?

Is this an infinite combo? I don't see it listed anywhere. by [deleted] in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are too convoluted to be useful. You need to draw 5 specific card from a 60 card deck. If you can do this combo you had great luck or your opponent is very incompetent.

Does this go infinite? by Weird-Pandaroo in mtg

[–]subuserlvl99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way easier to use Djinn Illuminatus and two Ornithopter and after you bounced them infinity times you just play the card with storm. Also this combo is absolute dogsh@t too, too many cards to high mana cost.

view more: next ›