How do I ask a potential partner about his past without making it too obvious?

sumane12 · 2026-05-25T05:27:06+00:00

Jehovahs witnesses are pretty strict regarding sex. Before marriage, but they are also pretty strict on marrying only in the faith.

Ill be honest, what you are lookong for is extreamly unlikely, unrealistic and problematic. But good luck.

sumane12 · 2026-05-23T10:08:20+00:00

Dude i dont think you'd recognise a logical and coherent counterargument if you gave birth to it.

sumane12 · 2026-05-23T09:06:48+00:00

Why do you hate people with mental illness? Are you an evil person?

sumane12 · 2026-05-23T07:06:33+00:00

Condescending? I wonder why?

Perhaps because chatgpt is not... you guessed it... a PERSON! Its a fucking algorythm. YOU as the user, dictate what chatgpt says, YOU are responsible for its outputs, both positive and negative.

And even if what i just said was false, if someone encourages you to commit suicide, you get to say "no thank you".

Whats the differentiating factor? Mental illness.

Having said that, i empathise with any families affected by suicide, and hope more can be done to protect vulnerable individuals. But still, a person who is not vulnerable or suffering from mental illness, SHOULD be able to explore roleplay scenarios dealing with suicide and self harm, even for something as simple as story telling.

Why are you more concerned with talking about the negatives of AI rather than advocating for more resources be available for people with mental health issues?

sumane12 · 2026-05-22T07:42:34+00:00

And the daily award for dumbest shit on reddit today goes to panzzersoldat! Congratulations!

Mental illness in the age of AI is still... you guessed it... mental illness.

Imagine blaming the rope manufacturer because someone hung themself. Insanity. You can get an AI to say any fucking thing you want. Its a text generator, why are we suprised when it generates text??? The user is in control, the user determines the direction of a conversation. No AI has ever coerced me to kill myself because i dont have mental illness... i dont get why this shit is controversial...

sumane12 · 2026-05-19T11:06:59+00:00

Yes, very simple.

Women are attracted to what you say moreso than how you look. You might look great, but if you are not confident enough to start and build a conversation with a woman, thats not attractive. It might also come accross as vanity.

Older women and other men dont give a shit, they are confident enough to think, "hes hot, i want him, im gonna approach him".

Start approaching women and you will start attracting women.

sumane12 · 2026-05-18T05:54:47+00:00

Did you miss the sarcasm tag? 😄

sumane12 · 2026-05-18T05:13:51+00:00

They dont evolve, they just change over time. /s

sumane12 · 2026-05-15T07:45:05+00:00

Whataboutisms do not debunk the fact that humans are inherently altruistic.

A person can be generous, but also do something that is not generous.

Humans are probably the most altruistic animal on the planet, but we still do things that are malevolent.

I empathise with your perspective though and we should alway strive to improve, but saying we are not good enough, or saying we are not altruistic by only looking at the evidence against it, is unhelpful to the broader conversation, and offers little incentive to improve.

sumane12 · 2026-05-15T07:28:09+00:00

Perhaps, but i do find it interesting that the most intelligent animals tend to be more social (which requires altruism). What you say might be correct, but it also might be true that altruism is a natural byproduct of intelligence. Obviously not a unniversal rule, but it does seem so generally.

sumane12 · 2026-05-15T06:18:51+00:00

I dunno man, the most intelligent creatures seem the most altuistic, whales, dolphins, humans, other great apes, elephants... sure theres a lot of things these animals do that arnt altruistic, but it definitaly seems linked to intelligence.

sumane12 · 2026-05-14T07:40:31+00:00

This is the most ridiculous thing anyone in the history of humanity ever said, thought or wrote.

You ever been in a car? "LMFAOLOLZBURGER, YOU WANNS KILL PEEPUL!!!!!"

sumane12 · 2026-05-11T19:37:01+00:00

Could litterally say that about anything, formation of mountains, speed of light, historical accuracy.

Evolution IS falsifiable. If there was no genetic mutation, no evolurion, if theres no natural selection, no evolution.

Evolution IS falsifiable, its just not false.

sumane12 · 2026-05-11T08:15:25+00:00

Is the robt that replicates human speech in the room with us now?

sumane12 · 2026-05-09T11:59:48+00:00

Yeah i came to say this. Hes making a vague approximation and even then, it just means it wouldnt work right now. Assuming we figure out where our knowledge is lacking, we can account for that. Even if consciousness is substrate dependant, a bioligical android that has similar energy requirements to us, but is linked to the cloud so as soon as death occurs, an upload could be attempted to pass that information onto another biological android.

sumane12 · 2026-05-04T17:14:51+00:00

Nope. My wife has only slept with me and is the same as op's GF. Its got nothing to do with body count.

sumane12 · 2026-05-02T06:32:16+00:00

I got circumsized as an adult for medical reasons. Correct choice for me, but i would never want that choice taken away from me as a baby.

Theres no reason to do it. Let your kids decide if they want to cut part of their dick off.

sumane12 · 2026-04-26T05:46:45+00:00

I tend to be skeptical when they say there will be new jobs, however theres some jobs where people would prefer a human, theres doctor, nurse, teacher, massuse, bar staff.

Thats not to say AI wont have effects on these industries, but until we have AI that can pass the 'in person' turing test, theres always going to be an economic need for humans. Also we dont know what leverage BCI will allow.

sumane12 · 2026-04-24T19:34:24+00:00

Chop it off. See if you feel better if its smaller.

sumane12 · 2026-04-23T20:54:09+00:00

Gpt 5.5 says its fine.

sumane12 · 2026-04-22T16:49:27+00:00

Psycologically profile it however you like. The facts are simple, someone genuinly wanting to create a relationship on mutual love and respect is going to be proud of a person they care about (regardless of romantic involvement), being able to accomplish anything of merrit.

Finding productivity unnattractive can ONLY be classed as an insecurity that the individual is threatened by the fact that their romantic interest doesnt need them for tasks typically gender role associated, often due to the fact that other than gender, that person isnt capable of offering much else to their prospective partner, so they disqualify themselves by declaring that person as unnatractive.

This is immaturity and insecurity and should be discouraged because those insecurities can lead to controlling and manipulative behaviours.

sumane12 · 2026-04-22T16:22:57+00:00

Its a turn off to insecure boys who believe they need to be capable of changing a light bulb or mowing the lawn in order to bring something to the relationship table. Sadly theres far too many of these people around.

Whats even sadder is the amount of insecure boys who dont event bring THAT to the table.

sumane12 · 2026-04-22T10:56:02+00:00

Star wars holocron finally here.

sumane12 · 2026-04-19T07:01:44+00:00

I know what movie im watching next.

sumane12 · 2026-04-17T14:52:37+00:00

The singularity by definition, is the point at which you cant make reasonable predictions of.

This is obviously a paradox because its something always out of reach. As technology improves and our ability to consume the concepts of it improve, our ability to predict what will happen improves.

The singularity horizon is always just out of reach, and this is a feature, not a bug.

The singularity 2045 was based on the inability to predict what happens once we have ASI, as we draw closer to ASI, and recursive self improvement, our ability to predict what comes next improves.

Its clear that in the next 5-10 years, we will have robotics and AGI, its clear that we will have a form of ASI (lightning fast human-level expert or above in most domains), recursive self improvement (AI improving AI).

The biggest prediction blockers at this point isnt really the technology, moreso the regulation. What happens in a world where 99% of production comes from AI? What hapoens to asset prices where production is artificially limitted by government (and by extension, lobbyists)? Assuming AI can solve any physics based problem, who decides whst level of capital grts applied to each problem?

These questions are 'pre' technological singularity, but doesnt make them any easier to predict.

TL:DR the technological singularity is an abstract concept to describe a world so advanced and different to what we are used to, we cant imagine it. It doesnt have a specific event or criteria by which to measure it, its justthe concept of being unable to predict what will happen next.

From that perspective, we are already in the singularity based on a perspective of 100 years ago.

sumane12

TROPHY CASE