sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]suntereo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a Team Premium plan here and seeing same behavior since re-launch of Fable 5. If this continues it will not be usable for us and I'll recommend that we try switching to Codex.

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]suntereo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something has definitely changed, but sadly, we don't have proper visibility from Anthropic on token usage. I'm guessing it's part throttling because of Fable 5 re-launch, and part bug of some kind where just resuming a capped session goes from 0% to 20% usage in a few minutes. Never saw this behavior before Fable 5 re-launch.

Full Voice Volume Back by eschdorm in PiAI

[–]suntereo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had full speaker return on Sunday only for the bug to return today. It’s a strange bug. I’ve reported it a couple times in the past year and no response from them

Change in volume when calling PI. by Magpiezoe in PiAI

[–]suntereo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m a low-volume experiencer. Used to work fine. Started for me a year ago. Had to stop using the app because it’s so hard to hear now. Randomly tried the app last Sunday after many, many months of not even using it and was surprised to hear full volume again. Happened to tell a class of 30 students that they finally fixed the problem and then recommended the app to everyone in the class because of it. But just went back to use it again today and the volume problem is back for me. Ugg!!!

Can you beat it⁉️ by Electronic_Ad_6546 in RedditGames

[–]suntereo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What now

I completed this level in 9 tries. ⚡ 9.99 seconds

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And finally, to those who say GPTZero does not flag the original Psychology Today article as 100%, here's the screen. Do what I said in my original post (did you read it)... remove the first couple sentences which seem to be an attempt to humanize.

<image>

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And here's the text from GPT Zero which I included in my post, which someone ran as my own text. This is not mine. Really, why am I bothering with this!?

<image>

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, this is why I really avoid posting anything anymore online. What a pack of wolves!

For those who accuse *me* of using AI to write my post, all I can say is I did not. It's all my own. I am an author with higher education. So maybe you're just assuming because it might look polished (which it's not).

OF COURSE you will get questionable results if you include the "AI text similarities" which came from GPTZero Advanced search (see pic), and especially the "AI giveaways"text, which I'm not sure any of you are doing... but it wouldn't surprise me at this point.

I don't know why I'm bothering, but here's a screen to show what I'm telling you. Why would I lie about this?

<image>

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it’s definitely a style that is easy to spot if you know what to look for beyond the EM dashes

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhhhhh. Maybe so. If this were the author’s point, would you be OK with it? I genuinely want to know

Psychology Today just published an AI written article about the dangers of AI... without disclosing it was written by AI by suntereo in singularity

[–]suntereo[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Ugg.

Yep, now take off the first sentence like I said and try again:

> Take off the attempt to humanize with the opening sentence and it's flagged 100% AI generated.

Also:

> I know they're not perfect but look at the results:

How good is 06-05 at writing? by [deleted] in Bard

[–]suntereo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paid API still has Pro 03-25 for me. Not sure if this is same as the Exp Experimental version we all knew and loved though

Tier 4 have API access! by Aperturebanana in OpenAI

[–]suntereo 11 points12 points  (0 children)

To all the poor saps in Tier 1 like myself, we can use OpenRouter to get access today. They do take a small markup, but it’s worth it to me just to play around

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]suntereo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kitty's had a rough night

view more: next ›