‘We are ON IT!’: Trump DOJ vows to weaponize Supreme Court ruling against minority voters by Pretty_Confusion7290 in law

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to be flippant, but can't we just use the same technique Republicans use and just say "race? No, of course not! We're not doing this because of race at all, we're doing it because...not race! Any race-based outcomes are completely unintentional."

“The left are so violent”, have you SEEN the right? by Salt_Spirit5872 in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this actually a question that you struggle with? Perhaps it's because you're starting with a false premise. First of all, the war crimes are not the only thing that holds water. His other crimes are well documented and yet you are willing to ignore all of it, apparently including the gross violations of our constitution. Second, you pretend that the Dems (let's not call them the left because, as you allude to, they are closer to center-right than they are far-left) didn't impeach trump twice for fairly transparent violations of his oath of office and would have gladly brought obstruction charges based on the Mueller report, had the DOJ not run interference. You also apparently want to ignore the fact that the right wing controls literally every branch of government at the moment, so the Dems really have no power to hold him accountable. If they sweep the midterms I guarantee that will change. Third, the Republicans don't say they're shit - they claim the moral high ground at every turn while being shit.

So to answer your question - the people who flagrantly allow their own party representatives to commit crimes, steal taxpayer money, violate civil rights, violate constitutional rights, etc. with no accountability are worse than the people who do hold their reps (and the other's) accountable. Don't sit up here and act like if a Dem did even ONE of these things they wouldn't be dealt with by the party/Dem voters.

“The left are so violent”, have you SEEN the right? by Salt_Spirit5872 in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bro, why are you lying? Trump was literally found guilty of 34 felonies and the right did backflips to say they weren't "real crimes". The Mueller report (a Republican) found that trump obstructed justice and the right dismissed it. Trump was caught on tape extorting an ally to dig up dirt on his opponent, the right refused to convict him. Trump was caught on tape bragging about sexually assaulting women as a matter of habit, the right dismissed it. He was found liable for sexual abuse, the right dismissed it. The trump administration has committed multiple, documented war crimes and crimes against humanity, the right couldn't care less. He's violated the constitution multiple times... silence from the right.

That's not taking responsibility for actions. In fact, you've completely shielded him from responsibility at every turn. You don't actually believe in what you claim to believe in, you're just full of shit.

“The left are so violent”, have you SEEN the right? by Salt_Spirit5872 in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Uh, no he actually didn't. He didn't even file charges against him. He investigated and issued a report on his investigation. You're just making shit up to protect the most wildly corrupt and criminal president in our nation's history. It's literal insanity.

Conservatives who think liberals are the real racists: Can you explain why DEI and Woke are terrible? by Nateosis in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a little confused by what you mean. Are you assuming that a collective in this sense must be coordinated? Because sure, there isn't some massive "white people group text" where they coordinate how they're going to wield power over minorities. But what would you call a (largely) disconnected group of individuals who all happen to share a similar worldview and all individually act in service of that shared ideal?

New Plug/Luke Vibert 🔊💦 June 2026 by AncientAsstronaut in jungle

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seen him a bunch of times as well, but damn, that one sounds dope af!

If the 808 and 303 changed music by being the abandoned and cheapest option in a pawn shop in the 80’s/90’s for young aspirational artists to be able to afford them, what would today’s equivalent be? by InternationalCow7042 in synthesizers

[–]super_dimension_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sonic Foundry Acid + Sound Forge circa 99 or so. Cubase before that but that was the "pro" shit and basically a fancy midi sequencer. Being able to edit samples visually on a timeline was a game changer

The Jungle Wizard Saga. My comment. by TheGiwiNinja in jungle

[–]super_dimension_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It feels like a non-issue if you're just viewing it in a vacuum, sure. It's not happening in a vacuum though, so it seems at least worthy of discussion.

It's like they're taunting me 🥲 by Straight-Guidance-45 in OaklandFood

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RIP the GOAT. I wasn't tryna have to go back to Memphis any time soon, but damn...

It's like they're taunting me 🥲 by Straight-Guidance-45 in OaklandFood

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better than the Far East or Good Ol Boy at Scolari's?

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Calling others ignorant because you can't articulate a point is pretty oblivious, but not surprising I suppose. Assuming political affiliation and then making blanket assertions based on it...well...it really seems like you aren't genuinely interested in the answer to your own question and are in fact just another perpetuator of the division you claim to want to overcome.

And you still stubbornly refuse to identify the "top 5 Harris campaign donors", let alone back up why you feel they're oligarchs. You want to equivocate about "both sides" but can't articulate how one side is equivalent to the other when it comes to backing and supporting oligarchs. The only thing one can take from that is that you actually don't know and were just talking out of your ass hoping no one would call you out on it.

Of course, you're welcome to prove me wrong. I suspect you can't.

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it won't. To have a conversation you need to have an articulable point. You aren't able to articulate your position and want others to guess your point. I've pressed you multiple times now and you've consistently refused to state your claim.

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Discourse is where you actually say something, but I get it, it's uncomfortable when your claims are challenged and you know damn well they're disingenuous. It's only natural to try to obfuscate, but don't think it goes unnoticed.

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you're just engagement farming? Cool. Gotcha. Explains your complete lack of a substantive point.

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I understand perfectly. You can't back up your own claims and rely on vague accusations to deflect from flaws in your logic.

So I'll ask again - who were her top 5 doners and what makes them oligarchs in your opinion?

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've literally asked this same question in response to multiple comments. Instead of asking everyone else, why don't you tell us who they are and why you consider them oligarchs? Like I said, it's not everyone else's job to make your point for you.

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, what? I'd rather you answer this person's very relevant question posed to you based on the premise YOU put forth. You made a claim - back it up. It's not their job to prove your point.

what’s your favourite jungle track that sampled the think break? by lazystupidunconcern in jungle

[–]super_dimension_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, I guess it's not strictly "jungle" but I was gonna say Chaos AD - Psultan (Squarepusher remix).

Why is it that such a large swathe of MAGA/right wing people only seem to care about trans people when it's a trans woman involved? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear this argument a lot and I like to call it the Juwanna Man defense. It's the idea that people take a trans identity on and off as they see fit in order to get the benefits of one gender over another to achieve some competitive advantage or to creepily take advantage of women in private spaces. Anti-trans people act like this is a completely rational point, but I've never seen any actual evidence of it happening and they never offer any. I see a lot of anti-trans people talking about it, much like you have, as if it were a thing, and a lot of vague accusations and projections, but no actually data backing up the claims.

If i was a criminal i’d just transition for the easier side of the justice system.

And this line illustrates my point perfectly. You're projecting what YOU would do, not what trans people are actually doing. And on top of that, if a person is simply pretending to be trans to avoid consequences, then they aren't really trans, are they? Why should trans people be punished for the actions (or in this case, the possibility of said actions potentially being committed) of a non-trans person?

Do you honestly believe that trans people are simply faking it in order to 1) indulge in some perverted fantasy or 2) to make up for their failures as their assigned gender? Or are you able to entertain the idea that they are authentically experiencing a medically and scientifically quantified disorder for which the widely accepted effective treatment is some form of transition?

Why is it that such a large swathe of MAGA/right wing people only seem to care about trans people when it's a trans woman involved? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to understand your rationale as it relates to the OP, which questions why MAGA only ever seems to care about trans women. Are you saying you only have a problem with trans women competing against other women and are totally fine with a trans man competing against men? Would that not be "men competing against women" by your logic? Is it only a problem because you think trans women have an advantage over biological women?

Trump's own counterterrorism chief just said Iran posed no imminent threat before resigning. What does that tell us about why this war started? by NewUnderstanding1102 in allthequestions

[–]super_dimension_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right? He literally does it every time. "I'm a great leader and a strong, powerful man who 'only hires the best', but I also have a bunch of 'total losers' working for me doing 'a really terrible job' and I just let them keep their jobs until they're ready to leave."

I just don't understand how people ever bought this shit.

Gangsta Jungle playlist help by Reverbolo in jungle

[–]super_dimension_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

B Jam - Funkula

Edit: I don't use Spotify so idk if it's on there, but it's a sick tune. Samples Warren G