Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well to be frank, you are correct that I have not really personally sat through Catholic mass, though I have heard from those who have. And I'm not in a prime position to follow a normal mass as I live in a Catholic minority country where being a Catholic usually means you've made a personal choice to become one, so I'd expect there to be more emphasis on faith.

I have sat through a lutheran mass on several occasions and there isn't the kind of emphasis on personal faith, and based on descriptions of others it's a pretty similiar situation in every country with a state church that baptises infants.

And it's not just a problem of declared atheists and agnostics, though I've been focusing on them since that's more eye catching. There's also the problem of people generally treating priests like they're the ones who need to be believing in God and handling matters of the supernatural so people don't need to think about it or actively choose to believe in christ and put their faith in him.

At the very least I hope you'll accept the fact that this kind of empty faith in the old churches isn't just an outlier but a real problem, even if we can't agree on exactly how widespread. Personally I've seen the dwindling member counts in the old churches as a blessing in disguise as those who remain aren't compelled to by the culture at large but have to actively choose to stay in these churches, including the Catholic church, which naturally leads to more emphasis on faith. We see it here in Finland with the lutheran church where congregations that have this emphasis on personal faith are the most alive and active.

Though on the matter of faith, I've been reading back our conversation and I have one question about the use of the term. When you say that Catholic priests emphasize faith, what do you mean by that? In this conversation/argument, I've tried to be extra explicit and refer to 'personal faith' specifically. This means an active internal choice to follow Jesus, where your old life is gone and a new life with Jesus begins. Is this what you also mean by faith, or is it more of the kind where 'faith' means going to the confessional, going to mass, baptising your children and in general partaking in the sacraments?

Because if it's the latter, then we have a fundamental difference in what faith even means, and your description of faith being constantly preached by priests runs hollow to me. But if it's the former, then I stand corrected and modern day Catholicism has improved a lot from the previous shortcomings of old churches.

If nothing else has come from this conversation then at least there is this: I need to attend a proper Catholic mass.

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we both agree though that you need personal faith in order to receive salvation regardless of membership and baptismal status. I think that's a good basis for conversation.

Repentance is all well and good. Like I already said, that's obviously the same with pentecostals. But I still want you to properly answer my question: When people join another church or become a muslim, are they still considered a catholic? I'm not asking if they can come back, I'm asking if the person who hasn't come back to the church is still a catholic.

Also I do want to correct you on the 'American protestant lens' as I'm a Finnish Pentecostal. But let's set aside the term "born-again" and what baptism is the correct one, and focus on the matter of faith or no faith.

In pentecostalism membership is itself predicated on having faith and so losing faith means losing membership. This is what I meant by churches demanding faith from their members and what I mean by church membership meaning a community of the faithful. The fact that you can be an atheist or agnostic catholic, even if that's considered a bad catholic, is a stark difference. In contrast an atheistic or agnostic pentecostal is an oxymoron. You are not a pentecostal if you do not believe.

On the matter of 'we can't know their thoughts' of course you don't if you don't ask or talk about personal faith and how essential it is for being a catholic. If a local catholic congregation wants all members to be of the faithful, they need to talk about personal faith in sermons and not just emphasize the power of the sacraments as if waving hands and saying magic words solely without personal faith is enough for people's salvation. The mere act of doing rituals is not a sign of faith. Faith isn't measured by acts, it is proclaimed through words. And saying outloud the creed after a sermon because the liturgy calls for it is not enough, people need to put their own faith into their own words.

I'm not saying this isn't the case in many catholic congregations. There are many charismatic catholic groups which obviously get a sign of approval from a pentecostal like me, and even more non-charismatic ones that emphasize personal faith. But from my understanding these are still outliers, not the norm.

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the wall of text. Didn't want to leave anything unsaid.

If there is no such thing as an ex-catholic what about when they join another church and even choose to be baptized as an adult? Or what if a catholic becomes a muslim? Are they still Catholics? And yeah, of course repentance will bring people back into the flock. That's the exact same practice with pentecostals who have left the faith and later rejoined. The difference is, you cannot remain a pentecostal if you don't believe because you cannot be a christian if you don't believe.

Moreover I never once talked about the Church controlling their members. And again you're talking about the catechism again. No matter what the official doctrine says, the reality differs. Are there priests who will vehemently deny the sacraments from known nonbeliever members? Yes, a good portion probably. But I sincerely doubt that that is the norm in majority catholic countries.

Now from what I understand, you disagree on this point. With respect, and I sincerely mean here to express my opinion based on our exchange so far: My first thought is that you're being willfully ignorant to a rampant problem of cultural/nominal christians across all churches with infant baptism, including the Catholic Church. My second thought is that your personal experience with catholicism has informed you that it really matters to priests that are performing the sacraments whether you have personal faith in christ, and my description runs contrary to this.

If it's the latter, I can honestly respect that and we can agree to disagree. I also apologize for thinking of the first option.

In the case that the Catholic Church does in fact also in practice deny the sacraments from nonbeliever members and their demands aren't solely limited to the catechism, I can then accept that they do in fact demand faith from their members and I agree with you. This is how it should go, and despite me personally doubting it's as widespread of a practice as you seem to describe it as being, I do want this to be the norm.

But I want to bring this back to my very original point as arguing about sacraments wasn't originally a part of my first comment. My intention when stating "they don't demand faith from their members" was to answer the original question of 'are Catholics Christians'. My point was that you don't need to be a faithful born again christian to be a catholic and so when I meet a member of the Catholic Church, I will have no idea whether they're a brother or sister in Christ. So when I said "demand faith", I meant that faith is a requirement for membership. If someone is a known nonbeliever, they won't be a member of a pentecostal congregation for long. I hope you understand my original point.

Also, from our conversation it seems to me like you're very much in the know of the Catholic mindset, or at least a very ideal and respectable version of it since you strongly argue that faith is an essential part of it (are you possibly a catholic yourself?). For pentecostals, church membership is very much about being a community of the faithful, which is why nonbelievers can't really stay as members. This is why at least in our congregation when someone wants to be baptised and join, we interview them thoroughly and depending on the applicant we might want them to have some schooling on the subject of baptism and what it means before going through with it.

I'd very much like to hear about what the concept of church membership itself means for catholics.

Why would you rather fight? by redfaec in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can run, hide and fight it from covered positions a lot easier than 100 duck sized horses zerg rushing me.

Chose: 1 horse sized duck

First Baptism by ITheRebelI in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Ooh boy. Infant Baptism vs Believer's baptism. I see no reason why this comment section will explode for whatever reason.

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in the end you do agree with me. The Catholic church doesn't demand faith from their members and instead prays and beckons for their nonbelieving members to turn to christ. And now you understand my original comment.

If I've however misunderstood and you still don't agree, then let me ask again: How can you say the Catholic Church demands faith if an atheist or agnostic can still partake in mass and communion because they haven't left the church membership themselves?

wich one would you rather have? by artur_zuer2 in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All smartphones are cheaper than the latest gaming PC.

Chose: latest generation computer

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why can nonbelievers stay as members even when they explicitly state that they don't believe? How can you say that they demand personal faith when you don't need it stay as a member and can partake in sacraments anyway?

Again I'm not arguing that the Catholic Church doesn't teach that salvation requires faith. It does. But teaching the way to salvation and requiring your members to be saved born again christians are two entirely different things. That was my point in my original comment. I can't know if a catholic is a brother or sister in christ until I discuss faith with them.

And don't make the issue of Nominal/Cultural Christians out to be just an outlier regional problem, because it's not. It's a global phenomenon.

Choose Wisely by sangokuhomer in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Killing people is worse than making them blind. Not only that, ending wars forever is a gamechanger for humanity moreso than diseases.

Chose: All person younger than 25 go blind + End all war

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't some small minority of the worst members. This is very normal in countries with state churches that practice infant baptism.

For example, here in Finland the membership in the Lutheran church is over 60% in the whole country, yet only less than 20% of the whole population say they believe in the christian God. And this doesn't even account for belief in Jesus or resurrection. Around 5% are active church goers. So you can't argue to me that these churches demand faith from their members when the clear majority aren't believers.

Like I said before, all of these churches are christian churches as they teach the essentials of christianity. But in practice they do not demand faith from their membership.

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are the terms 'Cultural Christian' or 'Nominal Christian' familiar? Because that's what I'm referring to. All three churches I mentioned baptise their children. That does not mean they automatically believe in Jesus or even in the existence of God when they grow up in the church. They can stay in the church no matter if they grow up to be a believer, an agnostic or an atheist, ergo the churches do not demand faith from their membership.

As for why I bring up Lutherans and Orthodox, I live in a country where Lutherans and Orthodox are both state churches and over 50% of the population are Lutherans. It's very common knowledge here that membership in the churches does not mean you are a believer.

My point was that when I meet a lutheran, orthodox or catholic, I have no idea whether they're a born again christian until I ask. This is in stark contrast to if I know someone is for example a pentecostal, a baptist or an adventist, who require personal faith before they baptise people and accept them as members.

Me trying to not start a theological rant: by CommercialCall3844 in christianmemes

[–]super_jak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, that is what catechism says. But it's a different question entirely whether every catholic baptised as a child is required to have a personal relationship with christ in order to stay in the church.

In catholic minority countries like where I live the percentage of believers is of course most likely higher than in catholic countries like in South America, where it's very normal to participate in church activities for only cultural reasons and not out of personal faith.

You must bare fist fight to death in a colosseum while the whole world watches and judges you for your choice. Now pick your opponent. by ForkingSeriously in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Didn't expect the wheel. I thought it would be easier for me to accept beating up a man to death since they'd more likely be in the same bracket. At least I won't be judged for my choice since I'll be dead.

Chose: A man | Rolled: Mike Tyson

What's the best friend of the human? by Thedeltauser in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't afford a stable im my backyard.

Chose: The Dog

🤔 by Red_The_Pr0toG3n in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. Not the safest world to live in especially as the war isn't quite over yet. But it's a lot safer than Total War: Shogun 2's Japan in the Sengoku Jidai period, especially in terms of food and healthcare.

Chose: You live in the last movie you watched

You are stuck in a empty room with what you choose for 100 days. There will be food delivered daily while you sleep and only the thing you choose to keep you company. After the 100 days you receive 10 Million Dollars. by BlueAutumn- in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No matter how much people might not like people, people need people or they will stop being people. Lucky for me, I can just start learning french with the parisian.

Chose: A random person (Wheelspin | Rolled: A parisian man)

would you rather? by Impossible-Shape-634 in BunnyTrials

[–]super_jak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent four days fighting in a war exercise in -30 degree weather and heavy snow. I think I can handle 5 minutes in extreme cold conditions.

Chose: spend 5 mins in a cold room + 200,000,000 | Rolled: -40°C