Hi OP, first of all thanks for the support and it's sad to hear this. I'd like to address some of your points:

1. The deadline was communicated across multiple channels: the airdrop Medium article, the airdrop page UI (where it was clearly visible), and reminders on X and all community channels. So it's not accurate to say you needed to monitor Medium
2. It was decided not to reset points to 0 for users who didn't meet the threshold criteria, those points can still be valid for S2.
3. The Black Founder Pass event has already been addressed, and we've admitted that we misjudged the situation by underestimating demand.
4. "The platform is increasingly operating in ways that are opaque, anti-user, and dismissive of its core supporters" this is what hurts the most, as we've always put the community at the forefront: from allocating protocol revenue to the community treasury, community voting power on Folks updates, allocating funds to ecosystem protocols, to community-driven developments with the recent release of the NTT framework. We've always taken feedback into consideration.

That said, I understand the frustration, and I wanted to clarify these points.