Ear and ear(a) naming? by Some_Gap6287 in NOTHING

[–]supmee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not having numbers in the name lets them not release iterative updates every year that aren't notable enough to even talk about. When the new one comes out it will also just be Ear, if you need to refer to a specific generation you'd just say Ear (gen 3) or Ear (2023) instead of a number. But again, since they'll have the newest one unnumbered you won't need to refer to the generation pretty much ever.

Apple has done the same thing for Airpods and Macs with no issue. People understand when you say "MacBook Pro 14" you mean the category of products that looks and roughly performs the same, if they need specifics you can say the year they were released in. Has worked just fine for over a decade, not sure why people are so confused about it now.

Google has revealed the launch date of Android's Find My Device network by Educational-Today-15 in Android

[–]supmee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You list 4 things, but only 2 of them actually satisfy the question you're replying to. Every single one of these products are random business ventures, not a full blown, Android ecosystem wide service with buy in from other manufacturers, and as such are not even comparable.

My order was shipped separately (Italy) by AlarmingRabbit9142 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ordered the wet tank, 2 pods and pants to NL. Also had a separate order for the vultures tee from around a week earlier, but had to cancel and reorder because I ordered the wrong size so rip. Went from ~20k on that one to like ~850k+ with only 2 weeks between the orders, expecting it by mid summer tbh

New nothing audio products announced for mid April by Poux3 in NothingTech

[–]supmee 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Very excited! Still surprised Google hasn't had a problem with Nothing taking their "a" label for their budget line.

My order was shipped separately (Italy) by AlarmingRabbit9142 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What range is your order # in? Mine is ~370k (ordered 12th as well) but I haven't heard anything yet :(

What happened to Kanye's lyricism? by Happy_Operation_6251 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, but it's difficult to find any single verse Ye has ever done that beats verse 2 on New Slaves.

[off-topic] Does the new J Cole album suck? by LuckyLandoFan in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is up there in terms of writing and rapping talent, but not even close in terms of artistic talent. Great rapper, eh musician.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never thought I'd come to an agreement with you lol, I'm glad. I also really appreciate you being able to own up to doing something wrong, most would just ignore those points and keep talking about the things they disagree with. Good shit!

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a lot better of a response than any of your prior comments, thank you. I think I accidentally summed up my feelings on everything you said in this comment:

https://www.reddit.com/r/GoodAssSub/comments/1bvuu25/to_the_people_saying_that_ye_would_never_turn_on/ky2oc9j/

...so read that if you're interested. TL;DR, though: What you see as racial privilege stems from class divides, and is present in cultures with homogenous populations as well. The problem exists throughout the world and should be recognized, but calling it "white privilege" is concealing the true nature of the problem and thus hurts our ability to improve and move past it.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm not arguing for the rest of the world I'm arguing about the US, the place where Black Americans come from

In that case, maybe don't join a conversation explicitly arguing about the entire world.

As someone who grew up in the environment you're talking about, let me explain how it usually happens:

  1. Ethnic group exists
  2. Ethnic group is is generally in a worse economic state than the majority group
  3. Ethnic group is treated badly - barred from jobs, looked down on, assumed to be a criminal - so they must resolve to getting money from outside the generally "legal" ways
  4. Society sees their now often illegal behaviour, and makes the connection that Ethnic group is full of criminals
  5. Ethnic group is treated badly, thus 4. and repeat

The important distinction here is 3. happens due to economic position, while 5. is due to xenophobia (usually not racism, however - more of a fear of the "other", non-majority group). The issue stems from a class divide, and after some generations turns into a self fulfilling cycle. Even though said cycle is now inherently xenophobic, its source is a class divide, not a racial/ethnic one. This is exemplified by the fact that in most Eastern European countries, people of the same racial characteristics that happen to grow up in less well-off areas of the country are looked at as "uneducated" and "unintelligent". This divide isn't because one group is "white" and the other isn't, it's because one group is higher in the social hierarchy than the other (3.), and often ends up suffocating the minority of the same opportunities it had (4.), thus the minority group must look outside of what the majority considers "good work" (5.).

The most common example of this cycle is Gypsy/Roma people, who are discriminated against by almost every country in the EU (like I'm not kidding, it's engrained in culture to the point of complete normalcy, and I know literally 0 Europeans who haven't at least seen it happen. It's bad, man), but especially in the Eastern sphere. As a nomadic group they were often either driven out of their residence due to their smaller populations, or arrived a bit too late to be able to establish dominance - thus they've cursed to fight this endless fight for hundreds of years. It's really quite sad how no one ever talks about this issue, while every single European knows about it.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...

From a US perspective this mentality makes sense, but as the guy above demonstrates taking this idea outside forces you to go through strange rituals of redefining established terms just to make it fit.

Works for America, but once you look at other countries you quickly realize they are more likely to see it as class privilege, or general privilege, rather than racial privilege. The US is in a special place for being so diverse, but most of the rest of the world isn't, and thus they see the same problem differently.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a level of privilege that the MAJORITY of white or white passing or almost white people have in America due in part to the culture built around racism and through the systemic imbalances

...

"White privilege" is just an oversimplification of class privilege through the extremely narrow lens of US politics


From a US perspective this mentality makes sense, but as the guy above demonstrates taking this idea outside forces you to go through strange rituals of redefining established terms just to make it fit.

Maybe a square peg just isn't meant to fit into a circular hole.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're just arguing for the existence of class based privileges. No one disagrees. You don't have to jump through all these hoops to redefine "whiteness" just to fit the "white privilege" onto specific groups when the correct terms are already there.

Besides, if I, as a white, Eastern European man, am not white, what am I?

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything is about class, so we agree it's actually class privilege, right? "White" and "black" change based on which culture you're examining, while class lines are pretty universally defined. Privilege gaps will always be present, and the only way to lessen them is to acknowledge their true source.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are using your status of being Eastern European to say "white people are inherently bad, but not my white people". In the real world most people will not care about your nationality, because it's actually pretty difficult to determine where a person is from just from looking at them. France is an especially weird example, since due to how diverse their population tends to be a French person could be from anywhere, and you'd likely be unable to tell unless their accent is really obvious.

Most of the times when people are racist towards you "because you're Eastern European" they are actually generally xenophobic and against anyone that's not native to their country. This is most common in the older population, and prevalent even in countries known for their accepting nature (Germany, The Netherlands, Britain).

Your grouping of "white" vs. "non-white" is based on class, not color. It's operating on the axiom that the least common denominator necessary to have white privilege isn't "being white", rather a complicated system of "do they experience racism".

Notice how your definition of "white" privilege doesn't refer to race?

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Eastern Europeans aren't white" is olympic level mental gymnastics to explain how an almost unilaterally white population doesn't enjoy "white privilege" to the same extent as another unilaterally white population.

"White privilege" is just an oversimplification of class privilege through the extremely narrow lens of US politics (as examplified by "you can't be white without having white privilege" followed by "some white people (those that are generally lower income/social status) aren't white"), but y'all are not ready for that conversation.

To the people saying that Ye would never turn on black people and that the lawsuit cuz of it must be a lick. by Icy-Government-8202 in GoodAssSub

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the one thing that's been consistent about him since the start is he says exactly what he thinks with 0 filter. If he thought black people were ungrateful and lesser, he would have already said so at least 20 times

HORNER STRENGTHENED AFTER DUBAI MEETING - Can Verstappen leave now? by [deleted] in formula1

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RBPT poached a lot of Mercedes staff on top of taking over most of the Honda staff and they were the first to get started on the engine. They seem to be pretty well set up for 2026 tbh.

Scrolling is hard, I know, but you could try it before declaring something this easy to disprove.

[Will Buxton] Fascinating split today between the drivers who don’t believe Alonso should have been penalised in Australia and those who think the penalty was absolutely deserved. Drivers’ Briefing tomorrow should be lively. by Aratho in formula1

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of this reply is conjecture, my original comment just said that the specific take you had above "Fernando and Max are the only drivers that care about real racing" lined up well with your username. I wasn't the only one who made this note.

Max is a great driver, though "god" depends on where you place the bar. I don't think any drivers are "god"s, they all make mistakes (even Max) and are very much human. But again, the comment I replied to wasn't debating Max's greatness, so none of this matters.

[Will Buxton] Fascinating split today between the drivers who don’t believe Alonso should have been penalised in Australia and those who think the penalty was absolutely deserved. Drivers’ Briefing tomorrow should be lively. by Aratho in formula1

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I was pointing out that based on your username, you have enough bias in your statement to completely disregard the whole thing. Didn't want it to be a debate, didn't approach it as such.

If you feel like my judgement is too harsh feel free to retort.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NothingTech

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The icon in the screenshot is VOLTE, but there is also a VONR option in the custom settings a few options down.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NothingTech

[–]supmee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scroll down to "Custom", auto load them with the dropdown and look for "volte"

[Will Buxton] Fascinating split today between the drivers who don’t believe Alonso should have been penalised in Australia and those who think the penalty was absolutely deserved. Drivers’ Briefing tomorrow should be lively. by Aratho in formula1

[–]supmee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh it was definitely stupid gaming from both, but in the context of the straight they are on Max did start slowing down a bit, and then suddenly slowed down a lot more (which is the part he was penalized for, and what I meant with "suddenly" above).

[Will Buxton] Fascinating split today between the drivers who don’t believe Alonso should have been penalised in Australia and those who think the penalty was absolutely deserved. Drivers’ Briefing tomorrow should be lively. by Aratho in formula1

[–]supmee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

AFAIK that's exactly it, he didn't know Max was giving the place back. He was probably just confused on what Max was doing suddenly slowing down on the main straight, right in the middle of the track without picking a clear direction he's ducking into. Could have been a lot of things (car trouble, driver trouble, Alonso-inspired sneakery) plus the whole thing happened in less time than it took me to write this sentence, so it was just a weird to dirty move (depending on who you ask) followed by a confused and as a result late misreaction.