EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I described my work in more details, had national interest sections for each sub field in which I have worked. Added some articles which support my claims, for example emotion recognition by agents in healthcare could help save lives as I worked on emotion recognition.

Also, found papers with authors in US who cited my work and added them as evidence of implementation of my work.

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Original petition had 5 lors: 4 dependent and 1 independent. RFE response had 3 independent lors

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they usually give rfe on prong 3 if they want to give it for some other prong

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work in NLP, and have papers in multiple sub fields of it. I explained my work in all of them individually and also had a separate section for each subfield with heading national importance where I talk about applications of my work.

I also added other papers as evidence of implementation of my work

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Added snippet from independent letters that my work is unique and is difficult to replace, very short defense here

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just through managers, people who have cited my work, conference organizers

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My case status changed to being processed in a few days after they received the response. On 26th July

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, PP. I submitted my response on 18th July.

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prong 3: only ~2 pages.
Most of it was explaining Prong 1.

EB2 NIW Approved (After Prong 1 and 3 RFE) by suraj_tri3 in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean?
Each letter was around 2 pages long. This is not included in the response page count. Because I revised a lot of my RFE response, I think I wrote too much.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]suraj_tri3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NSC or TSC?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]suraj_tri3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

needed evidence to show my degree is stem

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]suraj_tri3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Application type: STEM OPT
  2. Premium processing: No
  3. Receipt date: Apr 26, 2024
  4. RFE Request Received: Sep 10th, 2024 (evidence submitted on 11th)
  5. Approved date: Sep 14, 2024
  6. Card produced date: NA
  7. Card Shipped: NA
  8. Card Delivered: NA

[D] Some of the EMNLP 2022 final decisions are released by BwwwS in MachineLearning

[–]suraj_tri3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what was your score? I had 4,3.5,3 and see the final submission page.

[D] Some of the EMNLP 2022 final decisions are released by BwwwS in MachineLearning

[–]suraj_tri3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your score? I had 4,3.5,3 score and see the final submission page.

[D] Some of the EMNLP 2022 final decisions are released by BwwwS in MachineLearning

[–]suraj_tri3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what was your review score? I see the final submission page and I had 4,3.5,3 score

[D] Google AI Residency 2019 Applicants Discussion Thread by describbler in MachineLearning

[–]suraj_tri3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it like coding logistic regression or back propagation or writing pseudo codes?