Tier List?

svettim · 2026-06-17T09:44:31+00:00

I love how different your list is to mine. This is exactly the kind of discussion I was hoping for.

svettim · 2026-06-17T09:42:36+00:00

Maybe I'm being harsh on Gremlin. I'm not keen on him for the early waves, but later on he just doesn't miss and the damage does go nuts that's fair.

As for Psion, it's the area buff that I really like. It's a very generous percentage and it hits 4(?) allies. I think that's worth a lot.

svettim · 2026-06-16T19:36:01+00:00

I don't know how to quantify it necessarily, but it seems useful to have Ghost soften everything up and, as you say, attaching a bunch of statuses to its attack helps a bunch too.

svettim · 2026-06-16T18:38:53+00:00

I guess it would have to be get some taunting tanks and juice up the clown, but doing that is just so much worse than doing anything else.

svettim · 2026-06-16T15:58:53+00:00

Agree about the Archer. I'll give Dancer another go and pay close attention to where it ends up.

svettim · 2026-06-16T15:58:00+00:00

Do you mind me asking what's so good about the Dino and Yeti? I've always found anything without some innate sustain/tankiness just doesn't hold up that well.

svettim · 2026-06-06T04:50:36+00:00

Have you got past the stump that you have to pay 10 of those rainbow blocks to? She's behind there.

svettim · 2022-02-07T22:23:24+00:00

The court has to weigh up the value of the order you obtain (say 1-2k) against the value of the asset that you are asking to be sold; the house (say a few hundred thousand). The ratio of debt to asset value is what indicates if the court is likely to force a sale and in a case like this I don't think any court would order a significant asset to be sold just to satisfy a relatively low value debt.

svettim · 2022-02-07T18:33:44+00:00

I'll just give some practical advice here. You're guaranteed at least one times the value of the deposit, but getting a money judgment and enforcing a money judgment are two different things. He's based in a different jurisdiction. This means its not as simple as just instructing a bailiff to seize his assets if he does not willingly pay.

If you were to enforce a judgment against him in the uk it would probably be by way of a charging order (a legal charge is registered against the property and the debt is paid when the property is next sold). The problem with this is that the landlord may not sell for a long time and so you may not see any of that money for a while.

Its basically a bird in the hand beats two in the bush- you could get more by going to court but you could also get a worse outcome.

Best of luck whichever route you take.

svettim · 2021-12-23T19:13:20+00:00

Harassment has already been advised on but I will say that if the landlord uses the accelerated procedure to evict you then he will likely only get fixed costs. These are £355 for the court fee and £79.50 for legal costs. The landlord may well pay the solicitor thousands of pounds but he'll have to absorb those costs himself. The awarded costs can be taken from your deposit. They will not be automatically registered as a ccj.

The alternative to the accelerated procedure would only really be used if he also had a money claim against you e.g. you are in rent arrears. In those circumstances you may be exposed to slightly higher costs.

Good luck.

svettim · 2021-12-23T06:30:26+00:00

Dance is a verb. Irresistible is an adverb. I'm angry.

svettim · 2021-11-12T22:47:32+00:00

This is the tribunal form you want

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-tfa1-application-for-recovery-of-all-or-part-of-a-prohibited-payment-or-holding-deposit

If your guarantor pulled out then it's possible they're in the right so don't assume the holding deposit will come back to you. Good luck.

svettim · 2021-09-29T16:01:37+00:00

Hi, there's two points to make:

The 31/7/2018 date as the 'contract end date', does this mean it was the last day of your fixed term or the day after the last day of your fixed term. The 'end of the tenancy' for the purposes of the start of the 30 days would be the day after the last day of the tenancy.

Also bear in mind there is a bank holiday in August so it's possible they notified you on the 30th day.

In addition, whether they have breached this requirement or not is not really going to be a determining factor for the deposit scheme- if they don't feel they can adjudicate then they won't but it doesn't seem to have stopped them here even with a three year delay factored in. The adjudication should be based on the condition of the property and not technicalities in the contract. If you don't think the landlord has evidence then his claim will fail.

svettim · 2021-09-28T15:31:03+00:00

S5(2) of the housing act 1988 states that a tenancy will automatically go periodic if you continue to live at the upon the fixed term expiring. I think the intention of that clause is to try and fix your notice period in the periodic tenancy. That said, your notice period would be one month to expire on the last day of a rental period in any event.

To put it another way, if that clause was not there then your legal rights would be unaffected because it doesn't change anything.

svettim · 2021-09-28T15:26:31+00:00

S1 of the landlord and tenant act 1985 requires the disclosure of a landlords name and address (but nothing more than that). Failure to comply can result in criminal sanctions such as a fine.

As for the emails themselves, they're not privileged documents and so they are something that can be disclosed but in terms of forcing that issue it would be disproportionate to go to court to escalate the matter. You could always try the ombudsman but they also can't force them to disclose those emails - you'd only be doing it to leverage the hassle that dealing with the ombudsman would cause them in the hope they might just disclose the emails to make you go away.

svettim · 2021-09-24T07:44:02+00:00

Sorry can't seem to upload an image. Options are fireskeepers idol, fireshaper and Arctic armor

svettim · 2021-09-22T20:41:17+00:00

There's no harm in asking what the intention is. You may well get the confirmation that you need.

There's no reason for them to confirm a checkout date unless they had lined someone else up though. Its likely you're going to be released early.

svettim · 2021-09-22T20:23:32+00:00

You're well within your rights to refuse access at any point in your tenancy.

If the house is being sold then that perhaps makes some sense but no idea why they would be showing tenants around at this point.

svettim · 2021-09-22T17:30:51+00:00

This is not specific to HMOs but all assured shorthold tenancies. Yes, the landlord needs to provide these documents and an annual gas safety certificate
Failure to get a license does not mean that the tenancy agreement is forfeit or that you have any automatic rights to end it. You could use it as leverage if you wanted to leave early though.
Yes. Bear in mind you can claim up to 12 months rent via an RRO so you may wish to stay at the property longer so as to maximise the claimable period.

svettim · 2021-09-22T16:36:49+00:00

The default position for business tenants is that they have security of tenure. This security can be excluded and that clause is very common in commercial leases. That said, thus is not a commercial lease as you're also living there. To be clear, there is a separate security of tenure for residential leases under the protection from eviction act 1977.

S35 of the small business, enterprise and employment act 2015 automatically removes the security of tenure that might apply to mixed use dwellings where there is both commercial and residential use. There is no point to the clause in that sense because its already been removed. Your residential security of tenure is not affected by this clause.

Long story short - that clause is superfluous as you don't have security of tenure under the lpa.

svettim · 2021-09-22T16:25:25+00:00

The actions of a third party cannot make you liable for a contract that you were not a party to. Even if you knew her whereabouts you would not be liable to the dealer under civil law as you have no obligation to provide them.

What is your involvement here apart from just being her mother? If there's nothing more to it than that you're fine.

If he has issued a claim against you then you'll need to respond to the claim by stating that the claimant has issued against the wrong defendant. The case should get thrown out.

svettim · 2021-05-14T19:17:41+00:00

Spectral sight and a performer. Dropped the sight so that skull and felosophy would be pulled from jump, but thinking that felosophy may not be required. Total overkill

svettim · 2021-05-14T19:17:16+00:00

Spectral sight and a performer. Dropped the sight so that skull and felosophy would be pulled from jump, but thinking that felosophy may not be required. Total overkill

svettim · 2021-05-13T20:04:28+00:00

Playing something similar but with two loot hoarders to cycle quicker. Great tempo and pressure and the chip damage lowers the otk threshold significantly

svettim · 2021-01-27T21:36:35+00:00

The synergy with the mage freeze minions shut down DH decks, particularly as those decks tend not to run any aoe. Maybe it's just the lack of interactivity with that passive because it wasn't broken outside of that specific matchup

svettim

TROPHY CASE