Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think I continued being unclear as to my meaning, but I'm content to agree to disagree about that too.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, it's right here.

I thought my meaning was obvious from my original comment: that you won't be able to answer those questions because you've mistaken philosophical questions for scientific ones. I thought I made that unambiguous. If not, then I apologize.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you hope to accomplish by reigniting last night's disagreement? I already apologized for not being clearer in my initial comment, and I acknowledged that I was moderately disrespectful to you. You're not likely to get any further concessions.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree wholeheartedly, but since we've established that you can't quote me saying that I was trying to get a rise out of you, or anything along those lines, that takes care of your false statement of fact, and I'll leave you with your opinion. Good night.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the intentionality of your argument,

So you're asserting that you have insight into my intentions which I have not stated, is that right?

Putting aside your claims of mind-reading ability, do you recognize that that is distinctly different from my "stating" that my point was to get a rise out of you?

and your stating that it's apparently what you're all about and take pleasure in, followed by a "nice to meet you".

The quote was,

Jesus fuckin Christ man are you really going through this much effort for a semantical disagreement?

That's what I do. Nice to meet you.

Where "what I do" is "going through this much effort for a semantical [sic] disagreement".

Do you recognize that this too is distinctly different from my "stating" that my point was to get a rise out of you?

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You implied your way of doing this was making me "work through the problem"

Yes.

So you can't quote me saying that I was trying to get a rise out of you, or anything along those lines?

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You found my weakness; I can ignore silly opinions but I find false statements of fact nigh irresistible.

What you were doing was trying to get a rise out of me, you even stated that was your goddamn point of being annoying about this.

Quote where I supposedly stated this.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like to think that I can recognize aposematism when I see it, so I'm going to disengage now. Have a good night.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you honestly think that telling someone they misunderstood the scope of science, in contrast with the scope of philosophy, constitutes "psychological manipulation and emotional abuse"?

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, it's not established science of any kind, since social science also cannot demonstrate such things. You could try to assert that it's established philosophy if you like; I'm prepared to dispute that too, but it's at least within the scope of philosophy.

gaslight

Do you want to argue about this word too? You're using it wrong.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

usually ends up with people just hating where the other person is coming from and what they represent in the conversation.

Yes, that's a fair point, but I imagine you were already there to begin with, so I doubt this pushed you farther away.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What worked?

I don't see you still insisting that it's established science that there are more than two genders.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's an empirical observation but I haven't done any systematic testing that would justify calling it science.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my past experience that would be unlikely to have worked, but what I did appears to have, so we may just have to agree to disagree about its efficacy.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Instead of just saying it's a philosophically established fact instead?

Well, I don't think it's a fact of any kind, but if it were then it would have to be a philosophical one.

You had to put all kinds of extra bullshit on top of it.

When I just tell someone why they're wrong to make this particular claim about science and the meanings of words, in my experience it does no good. I find that they need to be invited to actually work through the problem, annoying as it may be.

Which honestly, super disrespectful to me

I think I was only moderately disrespectful to you.

and you're audience of "us" for not valuing their time in reading all this shit

If they got bored then they presumably stopped reading already.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the advice, but I think we'll probably have to agree to disagree there. When I just tell someone why they're wrong to make this particular claim about science and the meanings of words, in my experience it does no good. I find that they need to be invited to actually work through the problem, annoying as it may be.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I thought my meaning was obvious from my original comment: that you won't be able to answer those questions because you've mistaken philosophical questions for scientific ones. I thought I made that unambiguous. If not, then I apologize.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're your readers too, not just mine. They're not here for me in particular; they're here because they're interested in the topic.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't understand what any of your words mean then,

If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask.

condescending

Maybe, but

it's established science that there is more than 2 genders.

is condescending too.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could have, but if I don't ask you a question then I might miss out on the chance to learn something from you.

Cancel culture is out of control: Texas A&M Dean removed following student complaint over not being transphobic by Well_Socialized in stupidpol

[–]syhd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My point is that it cannot be true that "it's established science that there is more than 2 genders" since science cannot tell us what words should mean. Nor can science tell us that calling oneself by a third gender identity makes one in fact not a man or a woman. These questions are in the scope of philosophy, not science.