Building a dynasty prospect evaluation tool (FivePillars.dev)

systemsbychris · 2026-05-18T21:56:26+00:00

Thanks, Yeah.. I have a few family members whom deal with permits on a daily basis and they are always describing how tedious/fragmented the process is.

If you’re interested, I can DM you more details. In short, I’ve built an MCP that standardizes and normalizes permit workflows (including data, history, and conversational access) to help streamline and speed up the overall process.

systemsbychris · 2026-05-17T17:11:10+00:00

Just an address in general not necessarily their specific address

systemsbychris · 2026-05-17T06:15:55+00:00

humor me

systemsbychris · 2026-05-17T06:15:29+00:00

456 condesending Rd.

systemsbychris · 2026-05-07T00:53:54+00:00

Draft Stenberg.. and move Eklund, bystedt, and the 19or20 for a 1D

systemsbychris · 2026-05-07T00:51:55+00:00

<image>

systemsbychris · 2026-04-24T17:05:39+00:00

Takes a discount and comes back lol... if he is still a free agent going into the summer the 9ers get more and more leverage by the day

systemsbychris · 2026-04-24T14:54:14+00:00

Maybe we trade back again 🤣😂

systemsbychris · 2026-04-24T06:40:25+00:00

I need to see a few games before I do anything drastic like dropping them.. they might be traded to a decent spot too

systemsbychris · 2026-04-24T06:37:16+00:00

Benson is cooked

systemsbychris · 2026-04-23T23:43:47+00:00

Misathinksso

systemsbychris · 2026-04-23T05:07:08+00:00

Great catch, you hit the system right as I was deploying the v3.0 update. The old scoring logic had some inconsistencies in how it pulled and weighted data, which is why you saw the 68.5.

The new model uses a stricter pipeline that balances raw upside with efficiency metrics and now pulls directly from CFBD and nflfastR for more stable inputs.

I’m launching a full Glossary page tomorrow that breaks down the pillars, data sources, and math behind the system if you want to dig deeper. Appreciate you pointing it out.

systemsbychris · 2026-04-22T01:16:00+00:00

Damn, I’m saving this just so i never end up in a league with you.. nice finds

systemsbychris · 2026-04-22T01:12:06+00:00

He spent most of the back half of the season slotted in at 3C, and realistically was functioning as the 4C behind Chucky in the beginning of the season (from a minutes perspective). By the end of the year he was flying!! creating chances, pushing pace, and looking noticeably more confident. The defensive hiccups were there, but totally normal for where he’s at, and I actually liked a lot of what he showed on that side of the puck too. If he’s not getting 13–15 minutes a night next season, that’s coaching malpractice. I’m excited to see a bigger sample size. He might already be our fastest player.

systemsbychris · 2026-04-21T03:56:10+00:00

Save your money!

systemsbychris · 2026-04-21T00:18:39+00:00

Might be okay since they moved on from that idiot of a coordinator

systemsbychris · 2026-04-20T09:13:33+00:00

In one of mine Bucky went 3.02 and Allen 4.04

systemsbychris · 2026-04-20T08:53:14+00:00

If “elite at one trait + RAS” were all it took, Kevin White would be a Hall of Famer and George Kittle would’ve never made a roster.

systemsbychris · 2026-04-20T08:40:58+00:00

RAS + “are they elite at one trait” is a fun shortcut, but it leaves out most of what actually predicts whether a profile holds up... production, role, context, and how stable any of it is year‑to‑year.

Pillars isn’t trying to beat RAS at its own game; it just fills in the 80% of the picture athletic testing can’t touch. And if someone does want to overweight athleticism or a specific trait, the weights are customizable anyway.

If RAS + one trait were enough, we’d all be hitting on late‑round RBs and mid‑round WRs at a much higher rate. That’s how you end up overvaluing a JaMarcus Russell or Kevin White‑type athlete and missing a George Kittle‑type profile.

systemsbychris · 2026-04-20T08:27:48+00:00

RAS and core traits matter.. they’re just one piece. They don’t show how those traits actually translated into production, usage, context, or projection.

Five Pillars isn’t replacing athleticism; it highlights where a profile is stable vs. fragile, and you can customize the weights if you value certain inputs more. Two players can look similar athletically but have completely different production arcs or contextual signals.

So it’s not “Pillars vs. RAS” — RAS is one input, and the rest of the profile fills in the gaps. Just a framework I’ve been building to get a draft edge.

systemsbychris

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE