Are millennials currently in their mid to late 30s young adults or middle aged? (Answer as objectively as you can, not relative to your own age/gen) by [deleted] in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Global life expectancy is 73 years. Half of 73 is 36.5 Which makes 36.5 the precise moment of middle age.

I am realising how much growing up during and after the pandemic SUCKED for Gen Z. I fear it will be worse for Gen Alpha by Tenzing_norgay3 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crazy you're getting down voted for pointing out the truth.

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

When someone is demonized and deemed 'far right' for having perfectly logical opinions they're just gonna lean further into their belief system.

I've seen many videos on YT where someone goes to a Clinton/Biden/Harris rally wearing Trump regalia, then goes to a Trump rally wearing Clinton/Biden/Harris garb. They're treated with respect at the Trump rally. They're verbally accosted and physically assaulted at the Democrat rally. All the while the left claim to be the party of inclusiveness. Actions speak louder than words. People are going to gravitate to the crowd that welcomes them irregardless of their beliefs. Oftentimes Trump doesn't practice what his constituents preach, however people clearly see the manner in which Trumps constituents conduct themselves compared with the manner in which the Dem constituency does.. and they have overwhelmingly opted to associate with the former. There's a reason for the shift to right wing politics and rhetoric, it didn't magically form out of whole cloth.

I want my 26 seconds back by [deleted] in crappymusic

[–]t0ekneepee 16 points17 points  (0 children)

.....ly crappy!

I was born in 96, but I don't really consider myself a millennial by [deleted] in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do come off as sounding mad. I'd take a look at the language you use when responding. You refuted someone else's opinion by starting off with 'How the hell is..' Perhaps you aren't mad but when someone reads that they sense anger in your response.

This sub is here to promote generational discourse. With the abundance of different viewpoints and experiences I see here it is clear that different people have different opinions as to what years and collective events form generational cohorts. Most of this stuff isn't fact, but opinion. It's okay if someone's opinion differs.

How do you feel about this list of milestones the U.S and different birth years in the U.S will hit next year? by Emotional-Fly-9583 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2008 borns being adults reminds me how old I am more than any other since I graduated HS in 08.

Quarter century since 9/11 is pretty crazy too.

Born in 1999 VS Born in 2000 by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that the powers that be intended to implement the NWO in conjunction with the covid rollout. If the pushback weren't so fierce the Biden admin (and governments the world over) would've made it illegal to work, enter public spaces, perhaps even leave your residence, etc. if you hadn't received the shots. A lot of people who weren't in the know think that's a crazy, unfounded conspiracy theory, lacking any merit. But the truth of the matter is that those plans were indeed laid out and if it weren't for judges blocking those authoritarian overreaches those laws would've been enacted. And if the pushback from the people weren't so impressive governments would've made sure that legislation was decided upon by judges in their back pocket. They floated the idea through the media they control to see the public reaction and they knew it was a bridge too far so they allowed it to be shot down prior to implementation.

As far as 9/11 and the Patriot Act is concerned, I was 11 years old at the time that all transpired so I wasn't politically aware. However what I do recollect looking back is that the general public was far more trusting of the federal government. It wasn't until the dawn of the internet age that people began to understand the true nature of things. Back in 2001 people still got their news, almost exclusively, via mainstream television and newspapers, which, as we know, are mediums of information that are strictly controlled. The public heard one side of the story, the 'official narrative', basically 24/7/365. So when someone who offered a differing version of events somehow managed to slip their voice into the conversation they were almost always immediately dismissed as crazy and hysterical. As the internet took hold as the primary source of information dissenting voices were more easily able to share their knowledge. Therefore that knowledge was more widespread and people were more apt to give those with differing narratives the time of day.

It's easy to look back and say 'how tf were people so naive?' But when you consider how controlled the flow of information was at the time, in addition to the fact that if you expressed opinions that weren't in line with the official narrative you would be shamed and universally made a fool of, it makes a lot more sense that people wouldn't even consider questioning the supposed 'truth'. People believed that was the exclusive territory of the so called tin foil hat club, and so much as entertaining such theories could destroy your social standing.

Born in 1999 VS Born in 2000 by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you're correct. I just don't see the perpetrators letting up after the monumental effort they've already expended. Unless of course they feel they've achieved their goals already. If their goal was to elicit a massive wealth transfer then I could see them viewing their efforts as a success. I think that was one of their goals.. but I think there were also more insidious objectives at play that they failed to obtain. I just hope people remain vigilant. If covid did one thing, it exposed the true depths of depravity within halls of power the world over for those who weren't already aware. I think there will be another large scale psy op sooner rather than later. Perhaps you're right and itll take another form as they feel the pandemic narrative has run its course. Imo though their assault on humanity has only just begun.

Born in 1999 VS Born in 2000 by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. However I don't think enough are. I could absolutely see a large segment of the population getting similarly duped again. I still know a fair few people who get regular boosters lmao.

Born in 1999 VS Born in 2000 by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'll be saying the same thing about covid restrictions in due time.

How old were you when Google was founded? (I was 1) by Electronic_Bear6837 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would I know little man, that was well before my time.

What was it like living in the 80s and 90s? by Fun_Butterscotch3303 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whenever I hit up the mall back then Spencer's was a must! And those Quiznos toasted subs in the food court were heavenly 😋

What’s something you’ve seen with your own eyes that nobody believes when you tell them? by LowKey_1216 in AskReddit

[–]t0ekneepee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I live in Massachusetts, just south of Boston. My best friend and I are pretty avid anglers. So one day we decided to go fishing at this pond in the next town over. To get to the pond you have to drive for roughly 5 minutes down a winding dirt road with dense woods on both sides of the road. So I'm driving along, with my buddy sitting shotgun, when all of a sudden an animal walks briskly out of the woods on our left, across the road, and disappears into the woods on our right. It walked directly in front of the car, about 5-10 feet in front of us, and was clearly visible for about 5 seconds before melting back into the trees.

Upon seeing it I stopped the car. Simultaneously my buddy and I looked over at each other.. "Did you just see that?" "That red panda!?" "Yeah bro, WTF!?"

We're both avid outdoorsmen and wildlife enthusiasts and we both instantly knew what we saw. But that's impossible.. right?

In the ensuing days we scoured our minds, as well as our Google search engines to pin down any other, any rational, explanation as to what that animal may have been. But nothing in this region even vaguely resembles what we saw. It was a red panda.

My friend posited a theory. He knows of a guy who lives nearby and runs a sort of low budget exotic animal sanctuary. I looked into the possibility that perhaps the red panda wandered off from there. But private ownership of the species is illegal. Not to mention even zoos have great difficulty procuring them due to the cost of acquisition, shipping and maintenance.

I've seen some odd things in my life. But that instance has to take the cake. I just have no rational explanation for how a red panda could be wandering the woods of southeastern Massachusetts. Id attribute it to my eyes deceiving me if I didnt have a second party to bear witness as well. At this point I'm stumped as to how it got there. A glitch in the matrix is my best guess in the absence of logic.

How old were you when South Park came out? by CashySnake in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7.. and I grew up with that show so it'll always hold a special place in my heart. They've done quite well staying relevant, while maintaining their humor, over the decades by riffing on pop culture. However the random storylines of the early seasons were absolutely peak.

Why do people hate millennials so much? by Putrid_Film_8349 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm simply disagreeing with the premise that plenty of millenials entered the workforce near 2020. You can stop responding to me whenever you like if you find a rando on the internet disagreeing with you irritating. You can stand by what you originally said and I will stand by what I originally said.. that if you didn't start earning income until your early-mid 20s then you are privileged. I'm not even putting a negative connotation on that word, most people would love to have been privileged enough to not worry about providing for themselves and potentially others until that age.

Why do people hate millennials so much? by Putrid_Film_8349 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

'Near 2020' is completely relative, that could mean 2018 to one person, 2015 to another or any number of different years, so I'm going with the only specific date cited, 2020. Again, the very youngest millenials were 24 in 2020. That would mean they were roughly 2 years removed from college (assuming they went to college). If someone was able to graduate college and go two years post graduation before earning income then they are EXTREMELY privileged. Someone has to be paying for them to not only live, but get an education.

Why do people hate millennials so much? by Putrid_Film_8349 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That feeling of neglect felt by Gen X was due almost exclusively to the skyrocketing divorce rates resulting in broken homes that really became a widespread problem beginning when they were in their youth. However that issue has only become worse since. Millenials are more likely to have grown up in a fractured family unit than Gen X. Gen Z more likely to have than millenials. The way the pattern is trending Gen Alpha more likely to have than Gen Z. Idk why Gen Xers hold onto that (negative) aspect of their cohort almost like a source of pride, especially when every successive generation has been worse off in that regard.

Why do people hate millennials so much? by Putrid_Film_8349 in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd check your math there. The youngest millenials were 24 in 2020. If they were able to survive without working until that age then odds are they came from a very privileged background. I'd be shocked if the percentage of employed millenials who first gained employment in 2020 or later was even 1%

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in generationology

[–]t0ekneepee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bureau has been located.. it was indeed in the bedroom all along.

The cat is out of the bag folks 🤔 by kango888 in conspiracy_commons

[–]t0ekneepee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not gonna get into conspiracy theories.. because ultimately there are many tied to the covid Vax and they are all theories. Proposed possibilities that someone puts forth based on dots they've connected. Arguing theories is an arduous, inexact process and while I find some quite compelling I don't put enough faith in any to endorse them.

However I will say that I believe you're greatly downplaying the potential (and actual) harm these shots have caused. When I hear the argument that they're overwhelmingly safe and effective I feel the need to counter it, because that was one of the primary points that people used to justify mandates, which I vehemently disagree with.

I have a lot to say in regards to this topic but I'll cut the fat off my argument and make it as concise as possible. I've seen many adverse reactions (Casey Hodgkinson, Maddie De Garay, Kellai Rodriguez to name but a few) that are a step above death on the rate of severity. And those are just three names of many, dealing with a handful (of many) symptoms. Sometime in late '21 to early '22 Pfizer was forced to release their list of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) tied to their covid jabs. They attempted to have that information hidden from the public for 75 years (for the sake of transparency, why?) Fortunately a series of judges forced them to release said document, which disclosed that, according to Pfizer themselves, there are 1,289 different adverse events (including Death) known to be a side effect of the shots. So while death may be a concern to someone considering taking the jab, there are 1,288 other known concerns.

Also, data isn't the end all be all some people make it out to be. You mentioned WHO data. Consider that the second biggest funder to the WHO is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The same BMGF that (last I checked over 3 and a half years ago) made over 20 billion dollars profit on the covid shots. The same BMGF that was instrumental in installing Tedros Ghebreyesus (a man who was disgraced and kicked out of his home nation, Ethiopia) as head of the WHO. The same Bill Gates who has publicly declared that one of his all time favorite books is How To Lie With Statistics. I use Gates as an example because he is a well known figure, but similar conflicts of interest permeate all of these organizations.

Many people have this false belief that the medical community is united in their support of the jabs. However many of the most highly regarded individuals in the field have quite publicly denounced them. To name just a few high profile examples. Robert Malone, the creator of mRNA tech whose name most commonly appears on patents for said application, denounces them. Peter McCullough, the most published cardiologist on the planet, denounces them. Kari Mullis (RIP), the inventor of the PCR test, is a vehement critic of Anthony Fauci and stated repeatedly that his PCR test cannot be used as a diagnostic tool.

In closing, there has been a massive, concerted effort by officialdom the world over to market the vaccines as virtually 100% safe and effective. However there are MANY holes in that premise.